Women’s Right to Learn as a Foundation for Gender-Responsive School Policy: A Recension Analysis of Eight Ḥadīth Narrations on Women's Request for a Dedicated Learning Day
Main Article Content
Abstract
Disparities in educational access persist across Muslim societies despite formal equality commitments. This study analyses eight authenticated narrations preserved in Musnad Ibn al-Ja’d, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī (two recensions), Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Musnad Abī Ya’lā, Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān, al-Bayhaqī’s al-Sunan al-Kubrā, and Shu’ab al-Īmān. Here, women asked the Prophet Muhammad for a learning day of their own, stating men overwhelmed their access to him. These eight recensions converge on one pivot transmitter (madār), ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn al-Aṣbahānī. Thus, the study employs comparative recension analysis rather than corpus-based saturation logic common in thematic social science. Chains were assessed through classical rijāl criticism; textual variants were compared clause by clause and coded for normative content. Every recension reports identical sequences. The Prophet granted the request, fixed a time and place, taught the women from what God had taught him, answering a question about two deceased children. Five normative values are derived: acknowledgement of a gendered constraint on access as a legitimate claim, accommodation through dedicated time and space, curricular parity across separated settings, a learning environment that permits questioning, and instruction that addresses affective alongside doctrinal need. Read through Fredman's four-dimensional model of substantive equality, the prophetic response supplies an indigenous Islamic warrant for differential provision as a remedy for disadvantage rather than as discrimination. Four constraints govern translation into school policy: temporariness, curricular parity, learner initiation, and orientation toward mainstream transformation. The study also examines the competing segregationist reading of the same text and specifies the exegetical grounds on which it is rejected.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Aisyah, N. H., & Junaedi, M. (2024). Philosophical foundation and urgency of gender-equal Islamic religious education in Indonesia. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 8(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.30983/humanisma.v8i2.8730
al-Bājī, Abū al-Walīd Sulaymān ibn Khalaf. (1986). Al-Ta’dīl wa-l-tajrīḥ li-man kharaja lahu al-Bukhārī fī al-Jāmi’ al-ṣaḥīḥ (Abū Lubāba al-Ṭāhir, Ed.). Dār al-Liwā’.
al-Bayhaqī, A. B. A. (2003). Al-Sunan al-kubrā (M. ‘A. ‘Aṭā, Ed.; 3rd ed.; Ḥadīth no. 6598). Dār al-Kutub al- ‘Ilmiyya
al-Bayhaqī, A. B. A. (2000). Shu‘ab al-īmān (M. S. B. Zaghlūl, Ed.; 1st ed.; Ḥadīth no. 9102). Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.
al-Bukhārī, M. I. (2001). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī (M. Z. al-Nāṣir, Ed.; 1st ed.; Ḥadīth nos. 100, 6793). Dār Ṭawq al-Najāh.
al-Dāraquṭnī, ‘A. ibn ‘U. (1985). Dhikr asmā’ al-tābi’īn wa-man ba’dahum mimman ṣaḥḥat riwāyatuh ‘an al-thiqāt ‘inda al-Bukhārī wa-Muslim (B. al-Ḍinnāwī & K. Y. al-Ḥūt, Eds.; 1st ed.). Mu‘assasat al-Kutub al-Thaqāfiyya.
al-Kalābādhī, A. ibn M. (2000). Al-Hidāya wa-l-irshād fī ma’rifat ahl al-thiqa wa-l-sadād (‘Ā. Bastawī, Ed.). Dār al-Ma’rifa.
Amelia, M., Firdaus, A., Rosyadi, S., Millah, M., & Alif, M. (2024). Education for women: A thematic hadith study with a grounded theory approach. Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 7(1), 63–77.
Andang, A. (2026). Gender equality in Indonesian education: A systematic review of trends, challenges, and policy implications.
Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 21(1), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1970-2221/23498
Barlas, A. (2002). Believing women in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur’an. University of Texas Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cabus, S. J., Sok, S., Rutkowska, K., Van Horen, K., & Nicaise, I. (2023). Tackling school-related gender-based violence through teacher professional development in Cambodia. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09882-w
Chikunda, C. (2014). Identifying tensions around gender-responsive curriculum practices in science teacher education in Zimbabwe: An activity theory analysis. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.956409
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE.
Fredman, S. (2016). Substantive equality revisited. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(3), 712–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow043
Ibn al-Ja‘d, ‘A. (1990). Musnad Ibn al-Ja‘d (‘Ā. A. Ḥaydar, Ed.; 1st ed.; Ḥadīth no. 541). Mu‘assasat Nādir.
Ibn Ḥanbal, A. (2009). Al-Jāmi’ li-‘ulūm al-imām Aḥmad: Al-rijāl (K. al-Rabbāṭ & S. ‘I. ‘Īd, Eds.; 1st ed., Vols. 16–19). Dār al-Falāḥ lil-Baḥth al-‘Ilmī wa-Taḥqīq al-Turāth
Ibn Ḥibbān, M. (2012). Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān (M. ‘A. Sūnamz & Kh. Āydamīr, Eds.; 1st ed.; Ḥadīth no. 3020). Dār Ibn Ḥazm.
Likando, B. (2025). Embedding gender and inclusion at scale: Reflections from PEAS's government partnerships across Sub-Saharan Africa (Blog No. 2025/021). What Works Hub for Global Education. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-WhatWorksHubforGlobalEducation-BL_2025/021
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Mala, A., Chasanah, U., & Marpuah, S. (2025). Gender mainstreaming in the policy of Islamic boarding school education: A systematic literature review. An-Nisa: Jurnal Kajian Perempuan dan Keislaman, 18(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v18i1.316
Maleki, F., & Farooqi, M. Q. (2025). Exploring the challenges Muslim female refugee students face in the educational context of high school in the United Kingdom. Cogent Education, 13(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2594848
Mernissi, F. (1991). The veil and the male elite: A feminist interpretation of women's rights in Islam. Basic Books.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.
Muslim World League. (2025). Islamabad Declaration on Girls' Education in Muslim Communities.
https://themwl.org/sites/default/files/islamabad-declaration-on-girls-education-en.pdf
Muslim, M. A. (1955). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim (M. F. ‘Abd al-Bāqī, Ed.; Ḥadīth no. 4774). Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Nurun Najwah. (2021). Gender analysis on the misogynist hadiths in al-Kutub al-Tis’ah. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qurʾan dan Hadis, 22(1), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2021.2201-10
Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S., & Allison, C. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students' performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1042–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035740
Saifullin, D., Okan, S., & Akimkhanov, A. (2026). Women rights from Islamic perspectives: Navigating rights, challenges and contemporary perspectives. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1727894
Su, I-W. (2024). The Ten Promised Paradise: A study of the origin and formation of a Sunni doctrine through isnād-cum-matn analysis. Journal of Islamic Studies, 35(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etad002
UNESCO & UNICEF. (2025, October). Afghanistan education situation report 2025. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/new-report-warns-afghanistans-education-crisis-threatens-future-entire-generation
UNESCO Institute for Statistics & Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2025). Out-of-school rate. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/view/outofschool
UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024/5: Leadership in education – Lead for learning. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391406
UNESCO. (2026, August 11). 2.4 million Afghan girls barred from secondary schools [Data update reported via press coverage; original UNESCO
Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman's perspective. Oxford University Press.
Wasman, W., Mesraini, M., & Suwendi, S. (2023). A critical approach to prophetic traditions: Contextual criticism in understanding hadith. Al-Jāmi’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 61(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2023.611.1-17
Widad, N., & Razi, F. (2026). The Text–Culture–Living Hadith model: An anthropologically informed framework for hadith contextualization. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia, 7(2), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.22373/jsai.v7i2.10226
World Economic Forum. (2025). Global gender gap report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-gender-gap-report-2025/