Principles of Justice, Conference and Legal Accountability in Divorce Rules

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v8i2.12408
Keywords:
Religious Courts, Justice, Poor, women, children, legal, the rights.

Main Article Content

Masri Olii
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Abstract

The Religious Courts, in the last decade (since 2005) or since the implementation of the one roof system of judiciary, have made various improvements in the administration of justice to support efforts to reform the judiciary based on the principles of transparency and accessibility for all. the justice seeker. The Religious Courts are trying to reform several sub-systems in the judicial system that have so far not reflected equal access for justice seekers as well as protection or partiality for the rights and legal access of women, children, and the poor. The results of this study indicate that: the religious court is a place to seek justice and resolve Islamic family law problems, so in providing services to the community, it has the main task of providing fair and humane treatment to justice seekers, providing sympathetic services and assistance needed for justice seekers, and provide effective, efficient, thorough and final settlement of cases so as to satisfy the public.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Section
Articles

International Journal of Nusantara Islam uses the license Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to compose, repair, and make derivative creations even for commercial purposes, as long as appropriate credit and proper acknowledgment of the original publication from International Journal of Nusantara Islam is made to allow users to trace back to the original manuscript and author. Readers are also granted full access to read and download the published manuscripts, reprint, and distribute the manuscript in any medium or format.

References

Adam, P. (2020). Hukum Islam: Sejarah, Perkembangan, dan Implementasinya di Indonesia (Buku 2). Sinar Grafika.

Al-Jauziyah, I. Q. (2006). Al-Turuq al-Hukmiyyah fi al-Siyasah al- Syar’iyyah—Hukum Acara peradilan Islam (A. Qihar, Trans.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Alkostar, A. (2019). Menegakan Hukum Pidana. Mahkamah Agung. https:// www.mahkamahagung.go.id/images/uploaded/15f.MENEGAKKAN_HUKUM_PIDANA.pdf.

Butarbutar, E. N. (2009). Konsep Keadilan Dalam Hukum Perdata. Mimbar Hukum, 12.

Hamdani, N. (1992). Teori Tujuan Hukum. Gramedia.

Hartini. (2009). Pengecualian terhadap Penerapan Asas Ultra Petitum Partium dalam Beracara di Pengadilan Agama. Mimbar Hukum, 21(2).

Jurdi, F. (2017). Logika Hukum. Prenadamedia Group.

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2014). Problematika hakim dalam konteks hukum, pengadilan dan kemasyarakatan di Indonesia: Studi sosio-legal. Sekretariat Jendral Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.

Levit, N., & Verchick, R. R. M. (2016). Feminist Legal Theory. NYU Press.

Muqoddas, B. (2002). Mengkritik Asas-Asas Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum, 9(20).

Rahardjo, S. (2016). Sisi-sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Kompas.

Rahmah, A. M. (2013). Hermeneutika Hukum Sebagai Alternatif Metode Penemua Hukum Bagi Hakim Untuk Menunjang Keadilan Gender. Jurnal DInamika Hukum, 13(2).

Soepomo, R. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata. Pradnya Pramita.

Sulardi. (2015). Kepastian Hukum, Kemanfaatan, Dan Keadilan Terhadap Perkara Anak Kajian Putusan Nomormor. 201/Pid.Sus/2014/PN Blt. Jurnal Yudisial, 8(3).

Wantu, F. M. (2007). Antinomi Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim. Mimbar Hukum, 19(3).

Wantu, F. M. (2012). Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatn Dalam Putusan Hakim Diperadilan Perdata. Jurnal DInamika Hukum, 12(3).