Anggita R Hafsari, Ariyanti Oetari, Andi Salamah, Wellyzar Sjamsuridzal


Aspergilus ochraceu and A. terreus had been known as mould that causes significant loss to quality of tomatoes. One of potential methods to control the development of this mould by using the antagonistic activity of Rhodotorula sp. Six strains of Rhodotorula sp., UICC Y-318, UICC Y-325, UICC Y- 332, UICC Y-381, UICC Y-384, and UICC Y-386, which isolated from Cibodas Botanical Garden, West Java were observed for its antagonistic activity against mould A. ochraceu D1.2.2.2.SSM3 and A. terreus D2.2.MC. Co-culture method was used as 1.58 to 5.59 x 108 CFU/ml Rhodotorula sp. growth together with 7 x 107 CFU/ml A. ochraceus D1.2.2.2.SSM3 and 7.5 x 107 CFU/ml A. terreus D2.2.MC at PDB. Result showed that the highest percentage reduction of conidial heads and hyphal width was show by Rhodotorula sp. UICC Y-318 against A.ochraceus (9.45% and 12.43%; 7.10% and 7.51%, 2 and 3 day after incubation, respectively).

Full Text:



Azizmohseni, F., L.A. Hejri & M. Azar. 2007. The potential of yeast, Pseudozyma fusiformata strain Y76 to control Aspergillus flavus for reducing aflatoxin in Pistachio. Proceeding of the 11th international conference on culture collection: Connection between collection. 7-11 October 2007, Goslar Germany: 66—69 hlm.

Cappuccino, J.G. & N. Sherman. 2002. Micobiology: A laboratory manual. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco: xvi + 491 hlm.

Castoria, R. F.De. Curtis, G. Lima & V.De. 1997. Cicco. β-1,3-glukanase activity of two saprophytic yeasts and possible mode of action as biocontrol agent against postharvest diseases. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 12: 293—300.

Coelho, A.R., M.G. Celli, E.Y.S. Ono, G. Wosiacki, F.L. Hoffmann, F.C. Pagnocca & E.Y. Hirooka. 2007. Penicillium expansum versus antagonist yeast and patulin degradation in vitro. Braz. Arch. Of Bio. Technol. 50: 725—733.

El-Tarabily, K.A & K. Sivasithamparam. 2006. Potential of yeasts as biocontrol agents of soil-borne fungal plant pathogens and as plant growth promoters. Mycosci. 47: 25—35.

Filonow, A.B. 1998. Role of competition for sugar by yeast in the biocontrol of gray mold of apple. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 8: 243—256.

Fonseca, Á. & J. Inácio. 2006. Phylloplane yeast. Dalam: Peter, G. & C. Rosa. 2006. The yeast handbook: Biodiversity and ecophysiology of yeasts. Spinger-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg: 263—301.

Gandjar, I., I.R. Koentjoro, W. Mangunwardoyo & L. Soebagya. 1992. Pedoman praktikum mikrobiologi dasar. Jurusan Biologi, FMIPA-UI. Depok: vii + 87 hlm.

Helbig, J. 2008. Field and laboratory investigations into the effectiveness of Rhodotorula glutinis (isolate 10391) against Botrytis cinerea pers. ex Fr. in strawberry. BioControl. 108(4): 356-368.

Leibinger, W., B. Breuker., M. Hahn & K. Mendgen. 1997. Control of postharvest pathogens and colonization of the apple surface by antagonistic microorganism in the field. The American Phytophatol. Soc. 87(11): 1103—1110).

Mari, M. & M. Guizzardi. 1998. The postharvest phase: Emerging technologies for the control of fungal diseases. Phythoparasitica. 26(1): 59—66.

Moore, E. & Landecker. 1996. Fundamental of the fungi. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, xiv+ 574 hlm.

Oetari, A., A, Salamah and W. Sjamsuridzal. 2007. Bioprospek mikosin dari khamir indigenous Indonesia (asal kebun raya Cibodas) sebagai biokontrol jamur patogen pada tanaman pangan. Laporan Akhir Riset Unggulan Universitas Indonesia.

Ray, B. 2004. Fundamental food microbiology. 3rd ed. CRC press, USA: 608 hlm.

Saravanakumar, D., D. Spadaro, A. Garibaldi & M. L. Gullino. 2008. Detection of enzymatic activity and partial sequence of chitinase gene in Metschnikowia pulcherrima strain MACH1 used as post-harvest biocontrol agent. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 1: 1—11.

Yarrow, D. 1998. Methods for the isolation, maintenance and identification of yeasts. Dalam: Kurtzman, C.P. & J.W. Fell (eds.). 1998. The yeasts: A taxonomic study. 4th ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 77—100 hlm.

Zhulong Chan & Shipping Tian. 2005. Interaction of antagonistic yeasts against postharvest pathogens of apple fruit and possible mode of action. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 36: 215—223.