Fiscal Decentralization: A Comparative Study Between South Korea And Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v15i3.27745Keywords:
Local Government, Fiscal Decentralization, Study Comparative, Indonesia, South KoreaAbstract
Fiscal, administrative and political devolution from the center to lower levels of government has been widely advocated in both developed and developing countries. Fiscal decentralization implies more informed and more specific public local policies. Because fiscal decentralization can lead to more efficient provision of services and public goods to citizens and promote a better match between local government policies and citizens' needs. This study aims to compare the development of fiscal decentralization in South Korea and Indonesia. In OECD countries, one of which is South Korea, local governments spend more on housing and community development, the environment, culture, recreation and education. Meanwhile in Indonesia, personnel expenditure has the largest portion compared to other types of expenditure. So that the use of regional funds is still not optimal for improving the quality of life of the community.
References
Canavire-Bacarreza, G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Yedgenov, B. (2020). Identifying and disentangling the impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth. World Development, 127, 104742.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104742
Cho, I. G. (2018). Fiscal decentralization in Korea. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-11-2017-0113
Christia, A. M., & Ispriyarso, B. (2019). Desentralisasi Fiskal Dan Otonomi Daerah Di Indonesia. Law Reform, 15(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23360
Kim, S., Lee, Y., & Kim, T. (2022). The relationship between fiscal decentralization and trust in government: evidence from the South Korean case. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(2), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320933325
Koo, J., & Kim, B. J. (2018). Two faces of decentralization in South Korea. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-11-2017-0115
Maria, E., Halim, A., Suwardi, E., & Miharjo, S. (2019). Desentralisasi fiskal dan probabilitas terjadinya korupsi: Sebuah bukti empiris dari Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v22i1.2036
Moon, D. (2018). A Study of the Impact of the Fiscal Decentralization on the Regional Disparity: Focus on 16 Metropolitan and Provincial Governments of South Korea. 191, 89–99.
Negara, B. P., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2021). Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Konvergensi Pendapatan Perkapita antar Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v6i1.185
Park, J. (2022). Fiscal Decentralization and the Composition of Local Government Expenditure : Evidence from South Korea. 50(1), 62–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421221093142
Park, S., Park, M. G., & Nam, K. M. (2019). Growth effects of fiscal decentralization with weak economic motivation: the case of South Korea. In Annals of Regional Science (Vol. 63, Issue 3). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-019-00936-9
Puspita, D., Pahlevi, M., Raharja, Y. M., Hadi, S., Baroto, A. L., Permata, A. W., & Rahayu, W. T. (2021). Dua Dekade Implementasi Desentralisasi Fiskal di Indonesia. Badan Kebijakan Fiskal, 289.
Setiawan, F., & Aritenang, A. F. (2019). The impact of fiscal decentralization on economic performance in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 340(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/340/1/012021
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).