Implementation of Government Agency Performance Accountability System in Tana Tidung District Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v15i3.30981Abstract
This research is qualitative research with a case study approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate SAKIP in Taha Tidung Regency Government which obtained a fixed SAKIP value. Descriptive analysis methods are used to evaluate SAKIP components, namely Performance Planning, Performance Measurement, Performance Reporting, Performance Evaluation and Performance Achievements. The results of the study on the evaluation of SAKIP Tana Tidung Regency show that the targeted accountability value has not increased significantly, tends to experience a slowdown, there are main problems that cause unsuccess, namely: a) performance as OPD has not been outcome oriented, and the performance indicators set have not fully met measurable, relevant, and reliable criteria, this affects the implementation Value for Money, and cascading of these achievements become less relevant and reliable; b) has not integrated the planning, management, and evaluation system in building performance management so as to describe the working relationship between work units / PD that is effective and efficient to produce the resulting performance.
References
Akbar, B. (2015). Sistem Pengawasan Keuangan Negara di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusaka Negara.
Armstrong, M. (2017) Armstrong’s Handbook of Performance Management: An Evidence-Based Guide to Delivering High Performance (Google eBook). Available at: http://books.google.com/books?id=wtwS9VG-p4IC&pgis=1.
Armstrong, M., Baron, A. (1998) Performance Management-The New Realities. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
Arens, A.A., James L. L. (2008). Auditing Pendekatan Terpadu, Terjemahan oleh Amir Abadi Yusuf, Buku Dua, Edisi Indonesia, Salemba Empat
Atkinson, R. (1997). Pengantar Psikologi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Andarmoyo, Sulistyo. 2012. Psikoseksual dalam pendekatan Konsep & Proses Keperawatan. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz media
Berman, E., Moghrabi-Hijal, I. (2023) Performance and Innovation in the Public Sector: Managing For Result. 3rd edn. London: Routledge.
Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. In Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540
Danar, O.R. (2022) Manajemen Kinerja: Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Franco-Santos, M., Kennerley, M., Micheli, P., Martinez, V., Mason, S., Marr, B., Gray, D., & Neely, A.D. (2007). Towards a definition of a business performance measurement system. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27, 784-801.
Febiani, I., Irianto, G., Purwanti, L. (2016). Determinan Efektivitas Penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP). Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1).
Jurnali, T., Nabiha, S.A. (2015). Performance management system for local government: the indonesian experience. Global Business Review. 16(3), 351–363
KemenPANRB (2008) Pelaporan Kinerja dan Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja. Available at: https://perpus.menpan.go.id/uploaded_files/temporary/DigitalCollection/ZjQ0YWVhMGJjMGRmNThjYzMwYWM3NTkxYjU0MTJiNThjYzBlN2NlNg==.pdf.
Lebas, M.J. (1995) Performance Measurement and Performance Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41, 23-35.
Mardiasmo. (2022). Perwujudan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Publik melalui Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Sarana Good Governance.
Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah. 2 (1): 1-17
Moynihan, D.P. Pandey, S.K. (2007). The Ties that Bind: Social Networks, Person-Organization Fit and Turnover Intention. La Follette.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
March, J. G., Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. John wiley & sons.
Neely. (2004). Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
Nunhes, T., Bernardo, M., Oliveira, O. (2019). Guiding principles of integrated management systems: Towards unifying a starting point for researchers and practitioners. Journal of Cleaner Production. 210. 977-993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.066
Sholihah, A., Handayani, A. R., Igamaliga, I., Alamsyah, S., Sakinah, S. (2022). Efektivitas Program Germas Dalam Peningkatan Status Kesehatan Masyarakat Melalui Sosialisasi Germas. Jurnal Pustaka Keperawatan, 1(2).
Tangkilisan, H.N.S. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Birokrasi Publik. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Pembaharuan Administrasi Publik Indonesia dan Lukman Offset.
Umar, H. (1999). Riset Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Organisasi. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Walker, R.M., Damanpour, F. and Devece, C.A. (2010) Management Innovation and Organizational Performance The Mediating Effect of Performance Management.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).