Indonesia’s Deterrence Strategy from the Perspective of the Total People’s Defense and Security System (Sishankamrata)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v18i1.52086Keywords:
Deterrence Strategy, Sishankamrata, National Security, Total Defense, IndonesiaAbstract
Indonesia faces a clear gap between its deterrence doctrine and the institutional capacity required to execute it within the Total People’s Defense and Security System known as Sishankamrata. The doctrine is comprehensive, yet systematic evaluation of how its core elements operate as an integrated deterrence system remains limited. These elements include ideological, political, economic, socio cultural, and defense security dimensions. This study examines Indonesia’s deterrence strategy through the Sishankamrata framework and assesses how it shapes national deterrence capacity against complex and evolving threats. The study applies a qualitative descriptive approach. Data collection took place from January to October 2025. Primary data consist of official doctrinal documents from the Ministry of Defense, national defense white papers, and strategic policy statements. Secondary data include peer reviewed journals and comparative studies of total defense systems implemented in Nordic states. Data analysis uses thematic mapping and interpretive document review. Validity is maintained through document triangulation and cross checking between official and academic sources. The findings show that Sishankamrata provides a coherent deterrence structure that integrates physical strength, moral resilience, and non conventional capabilities. However, several constraints remain. Coordination across sectors is not yet optimal. Institutional readiness varies. Public understanding of defense is still limited. Strategic communication lacks consistency and impact. The study concludes that Indonesia’s deterrence effectiveness depends not only on doctrine but on consistent institutional reform, active public participation, and credible strategic signaling across all sectors of national life.
References
Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Booth, K., & Wheeler, N. J. (2008). The security dilemma: Fear, cooperation, and trust in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Brodie, B. (1959). Strategy in the missile age. Princeton University Press.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era (2nd ed.). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Clausewitz, C. von. (1976). On war (M. Howard & P. Paret, Eds. & Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1832)
Collins, A. (Ed.). (2013). Contemporary security studies (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fakhreja, R., Umam, K., Zahra, K., & Nurjiah, I. S. (2025). National cyber defense: Analysis of incident severity factors using a decision tree. Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi Tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v11i1.19798
Freedman, L. (2004). Deterrence. Polity Press.
Glaser, C. L. (1990). The causes and consequences of arms races. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 251–276.
Gray, C. S. (2000). Deterrence in the 21st century. Comparative Strategy, 19(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495930008403211
Habibi, A. (2024). Cultural resilience and cultural preservation strategies in maintaining the nation’s identity. Proceeding of International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity, 2(2), 2067–2072.
Haffa, R. P., Jr. (2018). The future of conventional deterrence: Strategies for great power competition. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 94–115.
Huth, P. K. (1999). Deterrence and international conflict: Empirical findings and theoretical debates. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.25
Jervis, R. (1979). Deterrence theory revisited. World Politics, 31(2), 289–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009945
Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Doktrin pertahanan negara Indonesia 2015. Kementerian Pertahanan RI.
Luttwak, E. N. (2001). Strategy: The logic of war and peace (Rev. ed.). Belknap Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
Morgan, P. M. (2003). Deterrence now. Cambridge University Press.
Nisar, D. R., & Rahim, T. (2024). Deterrence then and now: Mapping deterrence in the contemporary digital epoch. The Regional Tribune, 3(1), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.63062/trt/V24.038
Nye, J. S. (2011). The future of power. PublicAffairs.
Posen, B. R. (2014). Restraint: A new foundation for U.S. grand strategy. Cornell University Press.
Rachman, U. Z. (2025). Peran pilar demokrasi dalam meningkatkan ketahanan nasional di tengah tantangan globalisasi. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v2i1.655
Savilia, I., Mukaromah, K., Khasanah, K., & Sarpini. (2025). Ekonomi terbuka dan ketahanan ekonomi: Tantangan dan peluang di era globalisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.61722/jiem.v3i1.3437
Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and influence. Yale University Press.
Sekarsari, P., Fauziah, H. U., & Putri, M. F. J. L. (2024). Ancaman dan tantangan terhadap ideologi Pancasila. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 11(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.32493/jurnalpkn.v11i1.41975
Snyder, G. H. (1961). Deterrence and defense: Toward a theory of national security. Princeton University Press.
Sochfan, A., Darma, A. B., Santoso, W., Achnaf, M., & Herman, J. (2025). Maritime defense and maritime sovereignty: Indonesia’s strategy in responding to territorial violation in the North Natuna Sea. Saintara: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Maritim, 9(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.52475/saintara.v9i2.441
Till, G. (2018). Seapower: A guide for the twenty-first century (4th ed.). Routledge.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
Wibowo, C., Suseto, B., & Susmoro, H. (2024). Deterrence strategy through deploying KRI in the North Natuna Sea to support the national defense system. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 3(5), 2799–2813. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.1023
Wither, J. K. (2020). Back to the future? Nordic total defence concepts. Defence Studies, 20(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2020.1718498
Yarger, H. R. (2006). Strategic theory for the 21st century: The little book on big strategy. Strategic Studies Institute.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mitro Prihantoro, Arifuddin Uksan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license that allows others to share the work with acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier, greater citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).