Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The scope of the Tadris Kimiya Journal is about education and chemistry learning.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Tadris Kimiya Journal Review Policy

1. Each submitted script will be reviewed by reviewers.
2. Review process using Blind Review, meaning the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author did not know the reviewer's identity.

3. In the review process, reviewers give consideration regarding the fit between title, abstract, discussion (findings) and conclusions. In addition, the reviewer also gives consideration related to novelty, scientific impact, and reference used.


Publication Frequency

Tadris Kimiya's journal is published twice a year in June and December


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Ethic

To maintain the quality of the manuscript and to avoid publishing/plagiarism violations in the publishing process, the editorial board establishes the ethical scientific publication of Tadris Kimiya Journal. This publication ethics rule applies to authors/authors, editors, bestari / reviewer partners, and journal / editorial managers. The ethics of such publication refers to the ethical provisions of scientific publications established by the Research Council of Indonesian Research Professors (MPR) 2014.


Author Ethics

1) Reporting; the author must provide information about the process and the results of his research to the editorial in an honest, clear, and comprehensive, and still keep the research data well and safely.

2) Originality and plagiarism; the author must ensure that the manuscript that has been submitted to the editor is the original, written by himself, sourced from his own ideas and ideas, rather than plagiarizing the writings or ideas of others. Authors are strictly prohibited from passing the name of the reference source cited to someone else's name.

3) Repetition of delivery; the author must inform that the manuscript submitted/submitted to the editor is a script that has never been submitted/submitted to other journal publishers/publications. If there is any redundancy in the submission of a manuscript to another publisher, then the editor will reject the submitted manuscript.

4) Author status; the author should inform the editor that the author has the competence or qualifications in a particular field of expertise in accordance with the field of publication, namely librarianship. The author who submits the manuscript to the editor is the first author (co-author) so that if found the problem in the process of publishing the script can be completed.

5) Error writing script; the author should immediately inform the editor if found errors in the script writing, both the results of reviews and edits. Writing errors include the writing of names, affiliations/agencies, quotations, and other writings that can reduce the meaning and substance script. If that happens, the author should immediately propose the repair of the manuscript.

6) Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the author must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid any conflict of interest with other parties, so the script can be processed smoothly and safely.


Ethics Editor

1) The decision of publication; editors should ensure a thorough, transparent, objective, fair and prudent review of the text. It becomes the basis of the editor in making a decision on a script, rejected or accepted. In this case, the editorial board acts as a screening team.

2) Publication information; editors should ensure that the scriptwriting guidelines for authors and other interested parties can be accessed and TRAINED in clear, both printed and electronic versions.

3) Distribution of peer-reviewed manuscripts; editors should make sure reviewers and manuscripts for review, as well as inform the provisions and process of reviewing the manuscript clearly to reviewers.

4) Objectivity and neutrality; editors should be objective, impartial, and honest in editing the manuscript, regardless of gender, the business side, ethnicity, religion, race, inter-group, and author's citizenship.

5) Confidentiality; editors should keep every information well, especially with regard to the author's privacy and distribution of the manuscript.

6) Disclosure of conflicts of interest; editors should understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid any conflict of interest with others so that the process of publishing the manuscript runs smoothly and safely.


Reviewer ethics

1) Objectivity and neutrality; the reviewer must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and only in favor of scientific truth. The process of reviewing the manuscript is done professionally regardless of sex, business side, tribe, religion, race, inter-group, and author's citizenship.

2) Clarity of reference sources; the reviewer should ensure that the reference resource/quotation is appropriate and credible (accountable). If errors or irregularities are found in the reference source/quotation writing, the reviewer should promptly inform the editor to be repaired by the author according to the reviewer's note.

3) Peer-reviewed effectiveness; the reviewer should respond to the manuscript submitted by the editor and work in accordance with the specified peer-review period (maximum 2 weeks). If additional time is required in the review the manuscript should promptly report (confirm) to the editorial secretariat.

4) Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the reviewer should understand the ethical publications above to avoid any conflict of interest with others, so the process of publishing the manuscript runs smoothly and safely.


Journal Manager Ethics

1) decision making; the manager of the journal/editorial board should describe the mission and objectives of the organization, especially those relating to the determination of policy and decision of journal publishing without any particular interest.

2) Freedom; journal managers should give the reviewers and editors the freedom to create a comfortable working atmosphere and respect the privacy of the author.

3) Warranties and promotions; journal managers must guarantee and protect intellectual property rights (copyright), as well as transparent in managing funds received by third parties. In addition, journal organizers should publish and promote publication results to the public by providing assurance of usefulness in the use of the manuscript.

4) Disclosure of conflicts of interest; journal managers must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid any conflict of interest with other parties, so the process of publishing the manuscript runs smoothly and safely.


Plagiarism Checker

Every submitted paper will go through plagiarism screening by Turnitin.


References Management

In writing Citation and Bibliography, Jurnal Tadris Kimiya uses the Mendeley Reference Management Software.