Relasi Fikih dan Hadis dalam Praktik Pemahaman Kontekstual Ibn 'Abd al-Barr al-Andalusy (W. 463 H)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The meaning related to contextual understanding as one of the analytical tools in understanding religious texts needs to be understood properly. Combining hadith scholarship and social jurisprudence is one of the efforts made by many hadith scholars in interpreting traditions that are considered irrelevant to the times, one of which is Ibn 'Abd al-Barr al-Andalusy (463 H). This study aims to present the perspective of Ibn 'Abd al-Barr al-Andalusy in carrying out countyer efforts on the thought of the al-ẒÄhiri textual group in Andalusia in the 5th century Hijriyah. This research is a type of qualitative research using hadith and social fiqh approaches that involve the study of text and context. The main data presented are in the book Al-TamhÄ«d limÄ fÄ« al-Muwaá¹á¹a min al-Ma'Äni wa al-AsÄnid by Ibn 'Abd al-Barr al-Andalusy and the book Al-Muḥalla wa al- Ibn Hazm's AthÄr as a comparison of the Ähiriyah group. The results of this study indicate that Ibn 'Abd al-Barr in doing syarah hadith still pays attention to the scientific rules of hadith as well as criticism of sanad and matan, but by using fiqh reality can be found new meanings according to the needs of society at that time and also today. In other words, the presence of Ibn 'Abd al-Barr was able to solve the problem of shari'a in the classical age which is considered irrelevant in this modern age.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
’Abd al-HamÄ«d Ghubayh, T. ’Abd al-M. (t.th.). Mujaz TÄrikh al-Andalus min Fath al-IslÄmi ilÄ Suqut GharnÄta. Kairo: Maktabah al-MuhtadÄ«n al-Islamiyyah al-MuqÄranah al-AdyÄn.
’Abd al-MajÄ«d, M. ’Abd al-M. (2016). Al-IttijÄhÄt al-Fiqhiyyah ’inda AshÄb al-HadÄ«th fÄ« al-Qarn al-ThÄlith al-Hijriy min Usul al-Fiqh wa QawÄ’idiha. Kairo: Maktabah al-Khanji.
Al-Barmaky, A. al-’Abbas A. ibn M. ibn I. I. K. al-I. (1972). WafayÄt al-A’yÄn wa AnbÄ’ Abna’ al-ZamÄn. Beirut: DÄr SÄdir.
Al-GhazÄli, A. H. M. ibn M. (1980). Al-MankhÅ«l min Ta’liqÄt al-Uṣūl. Damaskus: DÄr al-Fikr.
Al-Humaidy, A. ’Abd A. M. ibn F. ibn ’Abd A. (2008). Jazwatu al-Muqtabis fi Tarikh Ulama’ al-Andalus. Tunisia: Dar al-Gharab al-Islamy.
Al-KhatÄ«b, M. (2011). Radd al-HadÄ«th min jihÄt al-Matan. Beirut: al-Shabakah al-’Arabiyyah li al-abhÄth wa al-Nashr.
al-Mas}na’i al-’Ansy, A. ’Abd A. M. ibn A. (t.th.). MisbÄh al-ArÄ«b fÄ« TaqrÄ«b al-Ruwah allazina laisu fÄ« TaqrÄ«b al-TahzÄ«b.
Al-MauritÄny, T. : M. M. A. (1978). Al-KÄfi fÄ« Fiqh Ahl al-MadÄ«nah. Riyad: Maktabah HadÄ«th.
Al-QardÄwi, Y. (2002). Kaifa Nata’Ämal ma’a al-Sunnah. Kairo: DÄr al-Syuruq.
Al-SakhÄwi, S. al-D. M. ibn ’Abd al-R. (1999). Al-Jauhar wa al-Durar fi Tarjamah Shaikh sl-IslÄm Ibn Hajar. Beirut: DÄr Ibn Hazm.
Al-ShaḥrÅ«zÅ«rÄ«, I. S. (t.th.). Al-Nukat ’alÄ KitÄb Ibn al-SalÄḥ. Madinah: Al-Majlis al-’Ilmi fÄ« al-JÄmi’ah al-IslÄmiyyah.
Al-SibÄ’iy, M. (2017). Al-Sunnah wa MakÄnatuhÄ fÄ« al-Tashrī’ al-IslÄmiy. Kairo: DÄr al-SalÄm.
Al-SuyÅ«t}i, J. al-D. (1984). AsbÄb WurÅ«d al-HadÄ«th fÄ« al-LumÄ’ fÄ« AsbÄb al-HadÄ«th. Beirut: DÄr Al-Kutub Al-’Ilmiyah.
Al-Ẓahabi, S. al-D. A. ’Abd A. M. ibn A. ibn ’UthmÄn ibn Q. (1982). Siyar A’lÄm al-NubalÄ’. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah.
Al-Zahabi, S. al-D. A. ’Abd A. M. ibn A. ibn ’Uthman ibn Q. (1374). Tazkirah al-Huffaz. t.tp: Dairah Al-Ma’arifah al-’Utsmaniyah.
Anshari, Z. I. (2016). The Early Development of Islamic “Fiqh†in KÅ«fah with Special Reference to the Works of AbÅ« YÅ«suf and ShaybÄnÄ«. Islamic Studies, 55(1/2), 149–191.
Bahruddin, M. (2011). Madzhab Rasionalis Literalis: Kajian Atas Pemikiran Ibn Hazm. Al-’Adalah, 13(2), 185–196.
Burge, S. R. (2015). The Search for Meaning: “TafsÄ«râ€, Hermeneutics, and Theories of Reading. Journal of Arabica, 62(1), 53–73.
Cattelan, V. (2017). Between Theory(-ies) and Practice(-s): Legal Devices (Ḥiyal) in Classical Islamic Law. Arab Law Quarterly, 31(3), 245–275.
Duderija, A. (2009). Evolution in the Canonical Sunni Hadith Body of Literature and the Concept of an Authentic Hadith During the Formative Period of Islamic Thought as Based on Recent Western Scholarship. Journal of Arab Law Quarterly, 23 No. 4, 389–415.
Dutton, Y. (2002). The Origin of Islamic Law. London: Routledge.
Eco, U. (1992). Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elliott, K. (2014). Rethinking Formal-Cultural and Textual-Contextual Divides in Adaptation Studies. Literature Film Quarterly, 42(4), 576–593.
Goldzier, I. (1981). Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hamidatoo, M. M. (2007). Madrasah al-HadÄ«th fÄ« al-Andalus. Beirut: DÄr Ibn Hazm.
Hendrik, J. (1996). Tradisi Kemodernan dan Meta Modernisme, Memperbincangkan Pemikiran Muhammad Arkon. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Ibn ’Abd al-Barr Al-Namary al-Qurt}u>by al-Andalusy, A. U. Y. ibn ’Al-buddal ibn M. (2017). At-TamhÄ«d limÄ fÄ« al-Muwat}t}a min al-Ma’Äni wa Al-AsÄnid. London: Muassasah al-FurqÄn li al-TurÄth al-IslÄmy.
Ibn ’IyÄd al-busti, A.-Q. ’Iyad ibn M. (1981). TartÄ«b al-MadÄrik wa TaqrÄ«b al-MasÄlik li Ma’rifat A’lÄm Mazhab MÄlik. Maroko: Maktabah FadÄlah.
Ibn al-HÄdi al-Dimashqi al-S{Älihi, A. ’Abd A. M. I. A. (1996). TabaqÄt “UlamĆal-HadÄ«th (Cet. 2). Beirut: Muassasah al-RisÄlah.
ibn Hazm al-Andalusi, A. M. ’AlÄ« I. A. ibn S. (2003). Al-MuhallÄ bi al-AthÄr. Beirut: DÄr Al-Kutub Al-’Ilmiyah.
Kesgin, S. (2012). Hadith and Islamic Law: The Role of Preunderstandings in Hadith Interpretasion. Journal of Ondokuz Mayis University Ilahiyyat Fakultas Dergisi.
Mala, F. K. (2021). Andalusia dan Pensyarahan Hadis; (I). Serang: A-Empat.
Menocal, M. R. (2000). Visions of Al-Andalus. In The Literature of Al-Andalus (hal. 1–30). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (30 ed.). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mudzhar, A. (2011). Pendekatan Studi Islam Dalam Teori dan Praktek. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Nurkholis, M. (2003). Metodologi Syarah Hadis. Bandung: Fasyil Grup.
Nuwaihad, ’Adil. (1988). Mu’jam al-MufassirÄ«n min Sadr al-IslÄm wa hatta al-’Asr al-HÄdir. Beirut: Muassasah Nuwaihad al-Thaqafiyyah li Ta’lÄ«f wa Tarjamah wa al-Nashr.
QÄdiri, M. A. (2017). Ta’qÄ«bÄt al-HÄfiz Ibn ’Abd al-Barr ’alÄ Ahl al-ZÄhir min ḥilÄl KitÄbihi al-TamhÄ«d. Ahmad Darayah University, Al-Jazair.
Ricouer, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and The Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: TCU Press.
Sa’ad, Q. ’AlÄ«. (2002). Jamharah TarÄjim al-Fuqaha’ al-MÄlikiyyah. Dubai: DÄr al-Buhu>th li al-DirÄsÄt al-IslÄmiyyah wa Ihya al-TurÄth.
Sa’id, I. G. (2017). The Heritage of al-Andalus and The Formation of Spanish History and Identity. International Journal of History and Cultural Study, 3(1), 63–76.
Saeed, A. A. (2014). Reading the Qur’an in the Twenty-First Century : A Contextualis Approach. In Routledge. New York.
Shaham, R. (2020). Legal Maxims (qawÄÊ¿id fiqhiyya) in YÅ«suf al-Qaraá¸Äwī’s Jurisprudence and Fatwas. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 140(2), 435–453.
Shannon, J. H. (2007). Performing al-Andalus, Remembering al-Andalus : Mediterranean Soundings from Mashriq to Maghrib. The Journal of American Folklore, 120(477), 308–334.
Suryadilaga, M. A. (2012). Metodologi Syarah Hadis : Kalsik Hingga Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Troxel, R. L. (2016). What is the “Text†in Textual Criticism? Vetus Testamentum, 66(4), 603–626.
Zysow, A. (2013). The Economic of Certainty : An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory. Harvard University (Ph.D Dissertasion) 1984.