Manipulasi Identitas Periwayat Hadis Periode Awal: Konsep, Dinamika, dan Kritik
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to examine the development of theories, the hadith science, and the manipulative hadith narrators—medallist—which is related to the ethical principle. They massively manipulated the identity of the narrators in the cabin period. It was done by disguising the teacher's identity, suggesting that the teacher was a credible person. The author used qualitative research methods by taking the numbers of sources in the early Islamic period before analyzing them conceptually-relationally. The author found that dynamicity had been done in the attempt to manipulate the narrators, which later the number started to increase as the generation changed. I argued that the manipulations in tadlis are contrary to ethical principles. Internal factors such as the narrator's motivation make the credible hadith effect it. In addition, external factors were also noted, such as the condition of teachers who were still small and were not considered reasonable by hadith critics.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Abu-Alabbas, B. (2017). The Principles of Hadith Criticism in the Writings of al-ShÄfiÊ¿Ä« and Muslim. Islamic Law and Society,24(4), 311–335. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26571280
Afwadzi, B. (2017). Kritik Hadis dalam Perspektif Sejarawan. MUTAWATIR, 7(1), 50–75. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2017.7.1.50-75
al-’Asqalani, I. H. (1987). Ta’rif Ahl at-Taqdis bi Maratib al-Mausufin bi at- Tadlis. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.al-BagdÄdÄ«, al-K. (1988). KitÄb al-KifÄyah fÄ« ‘Ilm ar-RiwÄyah. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-BagdÄdÄ«, A.-K. (1996). Al-JÄmi‘ Li-AkhlÄq ar-RÄwÄ« wa Ä€dÄb as-SÄmi‘. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Al-GaurÄ«, ‘Abd al-MajÄ«d. (2009). At-TadlÄ«s wa al-MudallisÅ«n. Beirut: DÄr Ibn Kaṡīr.
Al-Khaá¹Ä«b, M. ‘AjjÄj. (1989). ‘Uṣūl al-Ḥadīṡ ‘UlÅ«muh wa Muá¹£á¹alahuh. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Amin, K. (2004). NÄá¹£iruddÄ«n al-AlbÄnÄ« on Muslim’s á¹¢aḥīḥ: A Critical Study of His Method. Islamic Law and Society, 11(2), 149–176. JSTOR. Retrieved from JSTOR.
Amin, K. (2005). The Reliability of the Traditional Science of Hadith: A Critical Reconsideration. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 43(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2005.432.255-281
An-Nasai, A. ’Abd ar-R. bin S. bin A. (1423). Żikr al-Mudallisīn. Makkah: Dar Alim al-Fawaid.
as-SuyÅ«á¹Ä«, J. ad-Din. (1418). TadrÄ«b ar-RÄwi. Riyad: Maktabah al-Kausar.
as-SuyÅ«á¹Ä«, J. ad-Din. (1992). Kitab Asma’ al-Mudallisin. Beirut: Dar al-Jail.
Asaad, M. (2019). Kritik Hadis Berdasarkan Metodologi Hadis: Tawaran Scientific Nuruddin ‘Itr. Farabi (e-Journal), 16(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.30603/jf.v16i1.1032
Aslan, R. (n.d.). Suyûtî’nin Hadis Tenkitçiliği. 92.
Badiah, S. (2015). KRITIK HADITS DI KALANGAN ILMUWAN HADITS ERA KLASIK DAN ILMUWAN HADITS ERA MODERN (Tokoh, Parameter, dan Contohnya). Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Qur’an dan al-Hadits, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24042/al-dzikra.v9i1.1725
Bertens, K. (1993). Etika. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia.
Budiman, A., Safri, E., & Wendry, N. (2020). Studi Kritik Hadis Perspektif Jonathan A.C. Brown (Analisis terhadap Three Tiered Method). Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 22(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/substantia.v22i1.6853
Graham, G. (2014). Teori-Teori Etika. Bandung: Nusamedia.
Hodgson, M. G. S. (20). The venture of Islam. 2: The expansion of Islam in the middle periods (Paperb. ed., 14. pr.). Chicago, Ill: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Ibn al-JauzÄ«, ‘Abd ar-RaḥmÄn bin ‘AlÄ« bin Muḥammad. (1406). Aá¸-Ḍu‘afÄ’ wa al-MatrÅ«kÄ«n. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Ibn al-Salah al-Shahrazuri, `Uthman ibn `Abd al-Rahman, & `Itr, N. al-Din. (1998). `Ulum al-Hadith. Bayrut; Dimashq: Dar al-Fikr al-Mu`asir ; Dar al-Fikr.
‘Ibn Manẓūr, ‘Ibn Manẓūr. (1992). LisÄn al-‘Arab (Vol. 2). Beirut: DÄr IḥyÄ` at-TurÄṡ al-‘ArabÄ«.
Ismail, M. S. (1998). Kaidah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
’Itr, N. al-Din. (2005). Manhaj al-naqd fi ’ulum al-hadith. Dimashq: Dar al-Fikr.
Masrur, A. (2007). Teori common link G.H.A. Juynboll: Melacak akar kesejarahan hadits nabi. Yogyakarta: LKIS.
Muqtada, M. R. (2014). KRITIK NALAR HADIS MISOGINIS. Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam, 13(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2014.132.87-98
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Osman, M. N. A., & Ramle, M. R. (2018). Tadlis di Sisi Muhammad Ibn hibban (W. 354 H.): Satu Kajian Perbandingan. HADIS, 37–61.
Schacht, J. (1979). The origins of Muhammadan jurisprudence (Repr). Oxford: Clarendon Pr.
Syukrillah, M. (2019). METODE AL-ALBANI DALAM UJI VALIDITAS HADIS RIWAYAT MUDALLIS (Kritik atas Kritik Kamaruddin Amin). TAJDID: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Kemanusiaan, 3(2), 149–162.
Walter, M. (Ed.). (2010). Social research methods (2nd ed). South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press.
Watt, M. (1973). The Formative Period of Islamic Thought. Chicago: Edinburgh University Press.
Wendry, N. (2020). Kredibilitas Periwayat Kufah Kajian al-Jah wa al-Ta’dil dengan Pendekatan Sosiohistoris. Bandung: Mizan.
Wendry, N., Majid, A., & Susilawati, S. (2020). KUFAN HADITH TRANSMITTERS AND GEOPOLITICS IN EARLY PERIOD OF ISLAM. ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.10430