Hadith of Ghadir Khum and the Framing of Shia Teachings: A Comparative Analysis of Panjimas.com and ShiahIndondesia.com from Robert M. Entman’s Perspective

Main Article Content

Nur Annisa Istifarin
Muhid Muhid

Abstract

The theological divergence between Sunni and Shia interpretations of the Hadith of Ghadir Khum remains a persistent issue in Islamic discourse, particularly within the digital sphere. This study aims to analyze how two online Islamic media portals, Panjimas.com and ShiahIndonesia.com, frame the Ghadir Khum event and its implications for leadership in Islam. The research applies Robert M. Entman's framing model, encompassing four elements: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgment, and treatment recommendation. The findings reveal that Panjimas.com frames the Hadith of Ghadir Khum as a theological misinterpretation by the Shia that requires correction. It emphasizes the term mawla as meaning "helper" rather than "leader," thus taking a delegitimizing stance toward Shia claims of imamate. Conversely, ShiahIndonesia.com employs an affirmative framing, interpreting Ghadir Khum as a spiritual and social declaration of Ali bin Abi Thalib's leadership and as a continuation of prophetic authority within the doctrine of imamate. Consequently, both media represent contrasting ideological orientations: Panjimas.com upholds Sunni orthodoxy through a discourse of rejection, while ShiahIndonesia.com reinforces Shia identity through a discourse of affirmation. These differing frames demonstrate that the Hadith of Ghadir Khum functions not merely as a religious text but as a symbolic arena of meaning and authority contestation within the contemporary Islamic digital public sphere.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Afwadzi, B. (2014). Wasiat Khilāfah Pada Ali Bin Abi Thalib (Studi Komparatif Hadis Ghadīr Khum Dalam Tradisi Sunni Dan Syiah). Hermeneia: Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 14(1), 27–49.

Al-Maidah, Q. S. (67 C.E.). al-Qur’an al-Kareem. In Al-Qur’an Kemenag. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://quran.kemenag.go.id/

Al-Shaybaniy, A. ’Abd A. A. bin M. bin H. bin H. bin A. (1421). Musnad al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (Vol.1). Beirut: Muassasah al Risalah.

Annabil, F. M., H, G. . Z. M., Wardhana, M. K., & Faridillah, N. (2024). Syiah di Mata Anak Muda: Antara Ketakutan dan Keterbukaan akan Keberagaman Agama. TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah, 2(02), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i02.200

Attamimy, H. M. (2010). Ghadir Khum: Suksesi Pasca Wafatnya Nabi Muhammad saw. (Cet I; R. Rajab, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Grha Guru Printika.

Bahary, A. (2024). Revisiting the Legacy.The Ongoing Discourse on Ḥadīth of Ghadīr Khumm in Shiʻa Studies. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 25(2), 58–64.

El-razy, K. M. R., Asari, H., Badaruddin, K. M. S., Zailia, S. T., & Fahira, D. (2023). Kota Qom Sebagai Pusat Pendidikan Madzhab Syi ’ ah : Sejarah dan Perkembangannya. El-Idare: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 22–33.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Eriyanto, E. (2005). Analisis Framing (Kontruksi, Ideologi, dan Politik Media) (Cet.III; D. Mulyana, N. H. SA, P. Suroto, & S. Santo, Eds.). Yogyakarta: LKiS Yogyakarta.

Fata, A. K. (2017). Hadits Ghadir Khum, Mandat Kepemimpinan Untuk Ali? Stdi Islam, II(3).

Hafidli, M. N., Sasmita, R. N. D. L., Nurazhari, L., & Putri, N. R. G. (2023). Analisis Framing Model Robert Entman Tentang Kasus Kanjuruhan di Detikcom dan BBC News. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 3(1), 178–183.

Irham, M. (2011). Sejarah Dan Perkembangan Kritik Matn Hadis. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuwan Tafsir Hadis, 1(1).

Khair, N., & Assegaf, A. (2020). Peristiwa Ghadir Khum dalam Pandangan Teolog Muslim. Aqlania: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi Islam, 11(2), 221–241.

Mu’awanah, A. (2019). Syi ’ ah Dan Hadis (Tinjauan Historisitas Menurut Ulama ’ Sunni). Jurnal Al-Yasini, 04(02).

Muchtar, K. H. A. (2024). Peristiwa Ghadir Khum dan Kebatilan Hujjah Syiah. Panjimas.com.

Nabilah, J. (2022). Pemahaman Hadis Keutamaan Ali Ibn Abi Talib Dalam Pandangan Syiah. Jurnal Moderasi: The Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought, and Muslim Societies, 2(2), 73–99.

Noorhidayati, S. (2016). Rekontruksi Pemahaman Hadis Ghadir Khum. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuwan Tafsir Hadis, 6(2).

Pangestu, P. P. (2021). Efektivitas Dakwah Hadis dalam Media Sosial : Analisis atas Teori Framing Robert N. Entman. Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 6(1), 67–82. Retrieved from http://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/JDK/article/view/2958/1197

Panjimas.com. (2025). Panjimas – Menyuarakan Kebenaran. Panjimas.com.

Posha, B. Y. (2023). Penggunaan Hadis Ghadir Khum Sebagai Sumber Sejarah. Jurnal SAMBAS (Studi Agama, Masyarakat, Budaya, Adat, Sejarah): Journal of Religious, Community, Culture, Costume, History Studies), 6(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.37567/sambas.v6i1.1905

Salim, L., & Efendi, S. (2022). Interaksi Sosial Kelompok Syiah dan NU di Desa Labuhan Ratu VII Kecamatan Labuhan Ratu Kabupaten Lampng Timur. Socio Religia, 3(2).

Shodiq, J. (2025). Bagian Kedua: Makna Ghadir — Kepemimpinan Spiritual dan Sosial dalam Islam. ShiahIndonesia.com.

Sugiyono, S. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (Cet.II). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syarif, A. R. (2022). Framing Hadis Larangan Menggambar Makhluk Hidup : Analisis Komparatif Media Muslim.or.id dan SuaraMuhammadiyah.id. Journal of Hadith Studies, 5(5495), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v5i2-03

Washil, I., & Fata, A. K. (2018). Hadis Ghadir Khum Dalam Pandangan Syiah Dan Sunnah. Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadits, 12(1), 51–74.