Komunikasi Wartawan dalam Reportase konflik Agama

Enjang Muhaemin, Dono Darsono

Abstract


This study aims to explore the meaning and motives of journalists in reporting on religious conflicts and explore journalists' views on the root causes and solutions of religious disputes. This study uses a qualitative approach; the considerations are expected to produce descriptive data, both written, oral, and the behavior of journalists in reporting. The results show that journalists generally interpret religious conflicts as enjoyable, meaningful, and sensitive events. The motives of journalists to report on religious conflicts are more in the interest of documenting newsworthy events, placing problems in a balanced way, and straightening out information confusion in the community. The causes of conflict occur due to differences in perspectives, misunderstandings, intolerance, excessive fanaticism, weak legal umbrella, government indecision, immature religious understanding, the inability of religious leaders to suppress mass emotions, and the presence of certain interested parties. The conflict solution that must be carried out is the existence of a clear and firm legal settlement umbrella and the importance of dialogue in policy formulation..


Keywords


Keywords: journalists' motives, religious conflict, conflict reporting

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alase, A. (2017). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Reseach Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2). DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9.

Alpizar. (2015). Toleransi Terhadap Kebebasan Beragama di Indonesia (Perspektif Islam). Jurnal Toleransi: Media Komunikasi Umat Bergama, Vol.7, No. 2 Juli-Desember 2015.

Belekubun, S., Unde, A. A., & Cangara, H. (2015). Opini Tokoh Partai Politik Terhadap Keberpihakan TV One dan Metro TV dalam pilplres 2014 di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Komunikasi KAREBA, 4(2), 88–100.

Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design, Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kualitatif, dan Mixed. Yohyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Darsono, D., & Muhaemin, E. (2012). Secangkir Peristiwa di Mata Wartawan. Bandung: Mimbar Pustaka.

Eddles-Hirsch, K. (2015). Phenomenology and Educational Research. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(8).

Haryanto, S. (2012). Spektrum Teori Sosial. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruz Media.

Hasan, K. (2014). Kajian Netralitas Industri Media dalam Pemilu 2014. Jurnal SUWA Universitas Malikussaleh, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Juditha, C. (2016). Jurnalisme Damai dalam Berita Konflik Agama Tolikara di Tempo.co. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi dan Opini Publik (Vol. 20 No. 2, Desember 2016).

Kimball, C. (2013). Kala Agama Jadi Bencana. Bandung: Mizan.

Kovack, B. (2008). Sembilan Elemen Jurnalisme Kovach Jakarta: Yayasan Pantau.

Littlejohn, S. W,. & Foss, K.A. 2014. Teori Komunikasi, Theories of Human Communication. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Maftuchah, F. (2015). Dialog dan Toleransi (Sebuah Alternatif Dakwah di Tengah Pluralitas Agama). Jurnal Komunikas, Vol. 9, No. 1, Januari - Juni 2015

McQuail, D. (2015). Teori Komunikasi Massa. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika

Miharja, D. & Mulyana, M. (2019). Peran FKUB dalam Menyelesaikan Konflik Keaagamaan di Jawa Barat. Jurnal Studi Agama-agama dan Lintas Budaya, 3(2)

Muhaemin, E. (2013). Agama dan Media di Era Informasi. Bandung: Mimbar Pustaka.

Muhaemin, (2021, 11/12). Jurnalisme Multiagama dan Harmoni Keberagamaan. Galamedia, 01, No. 025 LIII.

Muhaemin, E., & Sanusi, I. (2019). Intoleransi Keagamaan dalam Framing Surat Kabar Kompas. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 3 (1) (2019) 17-34. DOI: 10.15575/cjik.v3i1.5034.

HMZ, Nandang. (2021). Peran Media dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Sosial. HIKMAH: Jurnal Dakwah & Sosial, Volume 1 No. 1, Maret 2021.

Rosyid, M. (2014). Keselarasan Hidup Beda Agama dan Aliran: Interaksi Nahdliyin, Kristiani, Buddhis, dan Ahmadi di Kudus. Jurnal Fikrah, Vol. 2, No. 1, Juni 2014.

Rusmulyadi. (2013). Framing Media Islam Online atas Konflik Keagamaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, ISBN 2088-6314 Volume 03, Nomor 01, Juni 2013.

Sihaloho, M.J. (2016). TB Hasanuddin: Konflik Atas Nama Agama Terus Meningkat. http://www.beritasatu.com/hukum/347848-tb-hasanuddin-konflik-atas-nama-agama-terus-meningkat.html. (diakses 3 Mei 2016).

Sindhunata. (2013). “Kata Pengantar” dalam Kala Agama Jadi Bencana. Bandung: Mizan.

Sirait, H. (2007). Jurnalisme Sadar Konflik: Meliput Konflik Dengan Perspektif Damai. Jakarta: Aliansi Jurnalis Independen.

Siregar, N. S. S. (2011). Kajian Tentang Interaksionisme Simbolik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Fakultas lSIPOL UMA: PERSPEKTIF, 4(2).

Sofian, M. R. B. M, & Hussein, A. (2013). Media Coverage on Religious Conflict in Malaysia : A Preliminary Study on How The Star and Utusan Malaysia Framed the Attempts to Subvert the Faith and Believe of Muslims in a Multiracial Thanksgiving Dinner at DUMC. Jurnal Procedia; Social and Behavoral Sciences.

Syahputra, I. (2006). Jurnalisme Damai, Meretas Ideologi Peliputan di Area Konflik. Yogyakarta: P_Idea, Kelompok Pilar Media.

Uswatussholihah, U. (2011). Ahmadiyah Dalam Sorotan Media Cetak Nasional: Analisis Wacana Terhadap Koran Republika dan Kompas. Jurnal Penelitian Agama.

Voakes et al. (1996). Diversity in the News. A Conceptual and Methodological Framework. Journalism & Communication Quarterly, Vol 73, N0 3.

Wibawa, D. (2020). Wartawan dan Netraliras Media. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Volume 4 Nomor 2 (2020) 185-206. DOI: 10.15575/cjik.v4i2.10531.

Yusuf, I. A. (2010). Dalam Kecamuk Konflik, Bagaimana Seharusnya Media Berpihak?. Sepetember 7, 2021, diakses dari https://bincangmedia. wordpress.com/2010/08/23/dalam-kecamuk-konflik-bagaimana-seharusnya-media-berpihak/#_ftn1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v5i2.15026

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Enjang Muhaemin

Creative Commons License

Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stat View MyStat