Basic Legal Theory in Indonesian Constitution: Reviewing Developmental, Progressive, and Pancasila Legal Theories


Andri Prasetio(1*)

(1) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Three legal origin theories of Indonesia have influenced the development of study and practice of Law in Indonesia, whether in its thought, creation, implementation, and enforcement. Those three theories are Mochtar Kusumaatmadja's Developmental Legal Theory, Satjipto Rahardjo's Progressive Legal Theory, and Romli Atmasasmita's Integrative Legal Theory. Developmental Legal Theory has been criticized by Progressive Legal Theory and Integrative Legal Theory which rebuilds both Developmental Legal Theory and Progressive Legal Theory. It proves that a theory is built based on previous theories. Viewing these theories (the Developmental Legal Theory, Progressive Legal Theory, and Integrative Legal Theory) from a convergence point generates the Legal Theory of Five Principles known as Pancasila. All these theories are based on living Law in society and primordial values of Indonesian, which are the values of Pancasila as peculiar of social life and volkgeist. Legal Theory of Pancasila is a legal theory based on the importance of Pancasila as an ontological, epistemological and axiological foundation.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Atmasasmita, R. (2012). Teori hukum integratif: rekonstruksi terhadap teori hukum pembangunan dan teori hukum progresif. Genta Publishing.

Bruggink, J. J. H., & Sidharta, A. (1999). Refleksi Tentang Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Kaelan, M. S. (2010). Pendidikan Pancasila. Paradigma.

Kusumaatmadja, M., & Sidharta, B. A. (2000). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum. Alumni.

Lon, Y. S. (2019). The Legality of Marriage According to Customary, Religion and State Laws: Impacts on Married Couples and Children in Manggarai. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 19(2), 302–317.

Mangar, I., & Ridho, M. R. (2022). Lembaga Independen Negara dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Definisi: Jurnal Agama Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2).

Meuwissen, D. H. M. (2007). Meuwissen tentang Pengembanan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum. In Terjemahan B. Arief Sidharta. PT Refika Aditama.

Rasjidi, L., & Putra, I. B. W. (1993). Hukum sebagai suatu sistem. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rijadi, P., & Priyati, S. (2011). Membangun Ilmu Hukum Mazhab Pancasila, dalam Buku Memahami Hukum dari Konstruksi sampai Implementasi. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Setia, P., & Rahman, M. T. (2021). Kekhilafahan Islam, Globalisasi dan Gerilya Maya: Studi Kasus Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia. Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan, 9(2), 241–264.

Shidarta. (2020). Teori Hukum Integratif dalam Konstelasi Pemikiran Filsafat Hukum (Interpretasi atas Sebuah “Teori Rekonstruksi.” Shidartablogspot.Com.

Sidharta. (2012). Sidharta, Posisi Pemikiran Teori Hukum Pembangunan dalam Konfigurasi Aliran Pemikiran Hukum (Sebuah Diagnosis Awal), dalam Mochtar Kusumaatmadja dan Teori Hukum Pembangunan, Eksistensi dan Implikasi. Epistema Institute.

Sidharta, B. A. (2016). Ilmu hukum Indonesia: upaya pengembangan ilmu hukum sistematik yang responsif terhadap perubahan masyarakat. Unpar Press.

Smith, dan R. T., Titus, & S, H. H. M. (1984). Nolan, Living Issues in Philosophy (Persoalan-persoalan Filsafat),. In Terj. HM. Rasjidi. Bulan Bintang.

Susilo, A. B. (2011). Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hermeneutika Hukum: Suatu Alternatif Solusi terhadap Problematika Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Perspektif, 16(4), 214–226.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/djash.v1i2.19594

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.