Pengaruh Sosial Politik Pada Metodologi Penafsiran di Indonesia (Orde Lama, Orde Baru dan Reformasi)

Authors

  • Eni Zulaiha UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Kartini Fujiyanti Agustin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Nida Al Rahman UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/hanifiya.v5i1.15538

Keywords:

local interpretation, interpretation methodology, power politics, social interpretation, textual analysis

Abstract

This paper tries to further examine the responses of commentators in the midst of the upheavals of the government during the Old Order, New Order, and Reformation eras. Interpretation which is a human product can be used as a parameter of Islam that the government running is state is in accordance with the teachings or not, so that in these three periods a continuous commentator was born with the politics that was going on at that time. The method used in this research is descriptive analysis based on library research. The findings of this study are that from the three periods of power, namely the Old Order, the New Order, and the Reformation, the are similarities in the style of interpretation used, namely Adab Ijtima’i, but different from the method of interpretation used, namely in the Old Order period, the method of interpretation used is the Tahlili method while the next two perioeds, namely the Thematic method according to the development of interpretation at that time.

References

Ahmad E.Q., N., & Sartika, E. (2020). Tafsir Feminisme terhadap Makiyyah dan Madaniyyah (M. T. Rahman & E. Zulaiha (eds.)). Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Al-ZarqÄnÄ«, M. al-‘Aẓīm. (1995). ManÄhil al-‘IrfÄn fÄ« ‘UlÅ«m al-Qur’Än. Cet. I.

Aliyah, H. (2015). Epistemologi Tafsir Syu’bah Asa. Dalam Jurnal Hermeneutik, 9.

Crespy, A., & Vanheuverzwijn, P. (2019). What “Brussels†means by structural reforms: empty signifier or constructive ambiguity? Comparative European Politics, 17(1), 92–111.

Fatih, M. (2019). Konsep Ulama dalam Pandangan Mufassir Indonesia: Studi Aspek-aspek Keindonesiaan dan Metodologi Tafsir al-Azhar Karya Hamka dan Penafsirannya terhadap Term “Ulama†dalam al-Qur’an. Progressa: Journal of Islamic Religious Instruction, 3(2), 67–78.

Federspiel, H. M., Arifin, T., & Hidayat, R. T. (1996). Kajian Al-Quran Di Indonesia: Dari Mahmud Yunus Hingga Quraish Shihab. Mizan.

Foucault, M. (1997). The politics of truth. Semiotext.

Gusmian, I. (2013). Khazanah Tafsir Indonesia; dari Hermeneutika hingga Ideologi. LKIS PELANGI AKSARA.

Humaira, D., & Astuti, P. (2017). Kritik Sosial-Politik dalam QS. Yusuf ayat 54-57. MAGHZA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 2(2), 81–90.

Husni, A. al-R. H. bin M. (2012). Masirah ‘Ilm al-Tafsir min Manzhūr Syekh Muhammad al-Fadhil bin ‘Ashur fi Kitabih: al-Tafsir wa Rijaluh. Majalah al-Dirasat al-Qur’aniyyah.

Kuntowijoyo. (1997). Identitas politik umat Islam. ATF Press.

Lazarski, C. (2021). 2-Liberty’s Ancient Roots. In Power Tends To Corrupt (pp. 37–59). Cornell University Press.

Mujahidin, A. (2017). Tafsir Alquran dan Praktik Politik Umat Islam Indonesia Perspektif Tafsir al-Azhar dan Tafsir al-Mishbah. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 7(2), 375–395.

Mulyaden, A. (2021). Kajian Semiotika Roland Barthes terhadap Simbol Perempuan dalam Al-Qur’an. Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 4(2), 139–154.

Oxford, P. U. (2020). Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. Oxford University Press.

Rahman, M. T. (2016a). Limits to Growth : Mempersoalkan Kembali Kapitalisme. JAQFI, 1(1), 1–12.

Rahman, M. T. (2016b). Rasionalitas Sebagai Basis Tafsir Tekstual (Kajian atas Pemikiran Muhammad Asad). Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 1(1), 63–70.

Rahman, M. T. (2018). Pengantar filsafat sosial. LEKKAS.

Rahman, M. T. (2020). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Rukin. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.

Said, H. A. (2015). Diskursus Munasabah Al-Quran Dalam Tafsir Mishbah.

Shihab, M. Q. (1994). Tafsir Al-Misbah. In Pesan, Kesan dan keserasian al-Qur’an (Vol. 2).

Shihab, M. Q. (1996). Wawasan Al-Quran: Tafsir Tematik atas Pelbagai Persoalan Umat. Mizan Pustaka.

Shihab, M. Q. (2005). Logika agama: Kedudukan wahyu & batas-batas akal dalam Islam. Lentera Hati.

Shihab, M. Q. (2007). Secercah cahaya ilahi: Hidup bersama al-quran. Mizan Pustaka.

Shihab, M. Q. (2015). Cahaya, Cinta dan Canda M. Quraish Shihab. Tangerang: Lentera Hati.

Shihab, M. Q. (2017). Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan dan keserasian al-Qur’an (Vol. 2). Lentera Hati.

Shomad, B. A. (2013). Tafsir al-Qur’an & Dinamika Sosial Politik (Studi terhadap Tafsir Al-Azhar Karya Hamka. Jurnal Tapis, 9(2).

Sunarto, S. (2019). Dinamika Tafsir Sosial di Indonesia. Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Keislaman, 3(1), 83–95.

Svarstad, H., Benjaminsen, T. A., & Overå, R. (2018). Power theories in political ecology.

Taryudi, T., & Setiawan, T. (2021). Tafsir dan Politik Kekuasaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 1(1), 63–70.

Van der Kamp, D. S. (2021). Blunt force regulation and bureaucratic control: Understanding China’s war on pollution. Governance, 34(1), 191–209.

Wahid, A. (2017). Sosial Politik dalam Tafsir HAMKA. ARICIS PROCEEDINGS, 1.

Zulaiha, E., Putra, R. A., & Gani, R. A. (2021). Selayang Pandang Tafsir Liberal di Indonesia. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 1(2).

Downloads

Published

2022-04-27

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).