Pemikiran Sayyid Qutb tentang Prinsip Solidaritas dalam Ekonomi Islam

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/hanifiya.v4i1.18003

Keywords:

pemikiran Islam, ganti rugi, pemberdayaan masyarakat, harga adil, kapitalisme

Abstract

This study tries to identify and analyze Islamic thought dealing with the problems of empowering society. This study uses a conceptual analysis, i.e. investigating conceptions or meanings in a concept. By this method, it is found that Islam, represented by Sayyid Qutb, has its own answers to such aforementioned questions.To the problems of empowering society, Qutb states that Islam has no problem in any form of social and economic differences, for Islam has its own system to handle the problem. In Islamic society, all differences are nothing if they are backed by piety. To this, all should have an opportunity to gain the piety. Otherwise, the social system should help those who could not do spiritual things by way of –among others—zakat, charity, and the like.

Author Biography

Mohammad Taufiq Rahman, (Scopus ID: 57192719687) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Scopus ID: 57192719687

References

Alekseev, M. P. (2018). Adam Smith and his Russian admirers of the eighteenth century. Econ Journal Watch, 15(3, September 2018), 351.

Arrow, K. J. (1983). Social choice and justice (Vol. 1). Harvard University Press.

Boyd, W. (2018). Just Price, Public Utility, and the Long History of Economic Regulation in America. Yale J. on Reg., 35, 721.

Britton-Purdy, J., Grewal, D. S., Kapczynski, A., & Rahman, K. S. (2019). Building a law-and-political-economy framework: Beyond the twentieth-century synthesis. Yale LJ, 129, 1784.

Cotterell, D., Ferreira, J.-A., Hales, R., & Arcodia, C. (2020). Cultivating conscientious tourism caretakers: A phenomenographic continuum towards stronger sustainability. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(8), 1004–1020.

DeHart, J. D. (2020). It Is What It Is": Literacy Studies and Phenomenology. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 596–603.

Elmouttie, M., & Dean, P. (2020). Systems Engineering Approach to Slope Stability Monitoring in the Digital Mine. Resources, 9(4), 42.

Hayek, F. A. (2012). Law, legislation and liberty, volume 2: The mirage of social justice (Vol. 2). University of Chicago Press.

Hengstmengel, J. (2019). Divine providence in early modern economic thought. Routledge.

Hossain, M. M. (2019). Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: Poverty Alleviation from an Islamic perspective. International Conference on Religion, Governance and Sustainable Development (ICRGD2019). Kuala Lumpur, October, 16–17.

Kamitsis, I., & Simmonds, J. G. (2017). Using resources of nature in the counselling room: Qualitative research into ecotherapy practice. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 39(3), 229–248.

Kinkaid, E. (2021). Is post-phenomenology a critical geography? Subjectivity and difference in post-phenomenological geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), 298–316.

Lazazzara, A., Tims, M., & De Gennaro, D. (2020). The process of reinventing a job: A meta–synthesis of qualitative job crafting research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116, 103267.

López, M. M. (2020). Linking Community Literacies to critical literacies through community language and literacy mapping. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102932.

Malik, P., Abd Jalal, A. F., Rahim, R. A. A., & Kahal, S. M. B. (2020). Malay Local Wisdom: An Analysis of Social History of the Malay Literary Saga Books. Temali: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 3(1), 39–85.

Mohamed, H. (2018). Macro and micro-level Indicators of MaqÄá¹£id al-SharÄ« ‘ah in socio-economic development policy and its governing framework. Islamic Economic Studies, 25(3).

Qutb, S. (1980). Al-Adalah Al-Ijtima’iyyah fi Al-Islam. Dar al-Shuruq.

Qutb, S. (1995). Al-Salam al-’alami wa-l-islam. Dar al-Suruq.

Qutb, S. (2000). Social Justice in Islam (H. Hardie, John B ; Algar (ed.)). Islamic Book Trust.

Rahman, A. (1979). Economic Doctrines of Islam. Mulslim Schools Trust.

Rahman, M. T. (2014). Social Justice in Western and Islamic Thought: A Comparative Study of John Rawls’s and Sayyid Qutb’s Theories. Scholars’ Press.

Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (2020). A theory of justice. In A theory of justice. Harvard university press.

Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations [1776] (Vol. 11937). na.

Swift, A. (2019). Political philosophy: a beginners’ guide for students and politicians. John Wiley & Sons.

Symanska, A. (2019). Free Market Economy and Capitalism. International Journal of Tax Economics and Management, 3(1).

Trifilio, S. (2018). The Economic Theory of the Scholastics as a Contractual Analysis. Journal Des Économistes et Des Études Humaines, 24(1).

Walter, R. (2020). Conservative Politics and Laissez-Faire Economics? The Burke-Smith Problem Revisited. Critical Historical Studies, 7(2), 271–295.

Whyte, J. (2018). Powerless companions or fellow travellers?: human rights and the neoliberal assault on post-colonial economic justice. Radical Philosophy, 13–29.

Zafirovski, M. (2019). Economics and Apologetics—The Ideology/Utopia of Laissez-Faire and its Discontents. Journal of Economic Issues, 53(3), 647–676.

Zajac, E. E. (1996). Political economy of fairness. Mit Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-14

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).