Kekerasan Antaragama: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis dan Analisis Bibliometrik


Paelani Setia(1*), Mohammad Taufiq Rahman(2)

(1) Ibnu Sina Research Institute, Bandung, Indonesia
(2) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Kekerasan antar-agama merupakan tantangan serius yang memengaruhi stabilitas sosial dan perdamaian di seluruh dunia. Fenomena ini mencakup berbagai bentuk konflik, dari yang berskala kecil hingga besar dengan dampak merusak yang signifikan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan wawasan mendalam tentang tren dan karakteristik penelitian terkait kekerasan antar-agama, khususnya dalam konteks politik identitas di Indonesia. Data dianalisis melalui pendekatan bibliometrik menggunakan artikel jurnal yang terindeks di Scopus. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa publikasi terkait kekerasan antar-agama mengalami fluktuasi tahunan, yang bisa mencerminkan perubahan dalam minat penelitian dan situasi global. Visualisasi bibliometrik juga membantu mengidentifikasi konsep-konsep kunci dan gap penelitian dalam studi ini. Temuan ini menyoroti pentingnya pemahaman tentang dampak media sosial, perubahan teknologi komunikasi, serta peran agama tertentu dalam dinamika kekerasan antar-agama. Selanjutnya, ditemukan bahwa beberapa kata kunci seperti “Islam,” “muslim world,” “Christian martyrs,” dan “terrorism” masih belum banyak diteliti, menunjukkan potensi untuk penelitian lebih lanjut dalam konteks kekerasan antar-agama. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman yang lebih baik tentang tren penelitian dan membuka pintu untuk upaya penelitian lanjutan dalam mengatasi kompleksitas dan dampak kekerasan antar-agama guna mempromosikan perdamaian dan harmoni.


Keywords


ekstremisme keagamaan; tinjauan sistematis; analisis bibliografi; perubahan teknologi; tren penelitian

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. (2016). Mass Communication Theory. Cengage learning.

Bartos, O., & Wehr, Y. (2002). Using conflict theory. Cambridge University Press.

Beller, J. (2018). Religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and perceived threat as predictors of Muslim support for extremist violence. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(4), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000138

Blanton, W., & De Vries, H. (2021). Paul and the Philosophers. Fordham University Press.

Clooney, F. X. (2018). Reading Religiously across Religious Borders: A Method for Comparative Study. Religions, 9(2), 42.

Davison, R., Martinsons, M., & Kock, N. (2004). Principles of Canonical Action Research. Journal of Information System, 14(1).

Dhamayanti, F. S. (2022). Pro-Kontra Terhadap Pandangan Mengenai LGBT Berdasarkan Perspektif HAM, Agama, dan Hukum di Indonesia. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 2(2), 210–231. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v2i2.53740

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Psychology Press.

Hadiz, V. R. (2018). Imagine All the People? Mobilising Islamic Populism for Right-Wing Politics in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(4), 566–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1433225

Haynes, J. (2020). Introductory thoughts about peace, politics and religion. Religions, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11050242

Jankowski, P. J. (2018). Religious beliefs and domestic violence myths. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(4), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel000015

Juergensmeyer, M. (2022). How Religious Violence Ends. Perspectives on Terrorism, 16(1), 38–45.

Kinnvall, C. (2004). Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology, 25(5), 741–767.

Kušen, E., & Strembeck, M. (2018). Politics, sentiments, and misinformation: An analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian Presidential Elections. Online Social Networks and Media, 5, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2017.12.002

Lösel, F. (2020). Resilience against political and religious extremism, radicalization, and related violence: A systematic review of studies on protective factors. In Understanding Recruitment to Organized Crime and Terrorism (pp. 55–84). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36639-1_3

Molhoek, B. (2021). Murder, Truth and Justice, and Religion: Altered Carbon and the Ambiguity of Real Death. In Human Interaction with the Divine, the Sacred, and the Deceased (pp. 164–177). Routledge.

Muralidharan, S. (2018). Studying the impact of religious symbols on domestic violence prevention in India: applying the theory of reasoned action to bystanders’ reporting intentions. International Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1339659

Qurtuby, S. Al. (2023). Beyond Liberal Peace: Religious Violence and Tactical Peacebuilding in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 10(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970231173525

Ross, J. I., & Vianello, F. (2020). Convict criminology for the future. Routledge.

Smock, D. R., & Smock, A. C. (1975). The politics of pluralism: A comparative study of Lebanon and Ghana. Elsevier New York.

Sussman, H. (2022). The Task of the Critic: Poetics, Philosophy, Religion. Fordham University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/hanifiya.v6i2.29607

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Paelani Setia, Mohammad Taufiq Rahman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License..

___

View MyStat View MyStat

Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama is Indexed By: