Jewish Liberation Theology and its perspectives among Jewish religious leaders on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Authors

  • Benny Triandi Syaamil Group Bandung, Indonesia
  • Mulyana Mulyana UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/hanifiya.v8i2.49567

Keywords:

ethical prophecy, interfaith solidarity, religious texts, theological responses

Abstract

This study explores the theological perspectives of Jewish religious leaders on the Israel–Palestine conflict, with a particular focus on Jewish Liberation Theology. Employing a qualitative approach through literature review and in-depth interviews with nine rabbis representing three theological strands—Religious Zionism, Moderate Judaism, and Liberation Theology—this research examines how the Jewish collective historical experience, particularly the Shoah and diaspora, has shaped differing interpretations of justice, power, and interfaith relations. The analysis adopts a contextual hermeneutic paradigm that integrates textual interpretations of the Torah, Talmud, and prophetic literature with ethical reflection on structural oppression and political violence. The findings reveal that Jewish Liberation Theology constructs a narrative of universal solidarity, rejecting exclusivist claims to sacred land and advocating for the rights of Palestinians as a moral imperative rooted in Torah ethics. In contrast, Religious Zionist theology affirms the establishment of the State of Israel as a fulfillment of divine prophecy and upholds Jewish ethno-religious sovereignty. Meanwhile, Moderate Jewish theology seeks a balance between pluralism, democracy, and religious tradition. The study concludes that these theological divergences have significant implications for the political and ethical orientations of Jewish communities both in Israel and the diaspora. The research contributes to the field of religious studies by offering a new typological mapping of Jewish theological responses to political conflict and demonstrating how religious belief can function both as a source of domination and as a liberating moral force.

References

Aggestam, K. (1999). Reframing and resolving conflict: Israeli-Palestinian negotiations 1988-1998 (Issue 108). Lund University.

Anderson, E. S. (2022). Can we talk?: Communicating moral concern in an era of polarized politics. Journal of Practical Ethics, 10(1).

Ascherman, A. (2020). Justice for All: Seeking God’s Justice in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Torat Tzedek.

Aviner, S. (2009). Emunat Iteinu: Faith and Security in Our Times. Beit El Publications.

Balthaser, B. (2025). Citizens of the Whole World: Anti-Zionism and the Cultures of the American Jewish Left. Verso Books.

Brannen, J. (2017). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: an overview. Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research, 3–37.

Cheron, C., Salvagni, J., & Colomby, R. K. (2022). The qualitative approach interview in administration: A guide for researchers. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26, e210011.

Chukwuebuka Ohaekwusi, A. (2021). Ethical analysis of religious violence in the contemporary debates on terrorism.

Cummings, R. E., Monroe, S. M., & Watkins, M. (2024). Generative AI in first-year writing: An early analysis of affordances, limitations, and a framework for the future. Computers and Composition, 71, 102827.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-25

Citation Check