Seleksi dan indeks sensitivitas cekaman kekeringan galur-galur padi sawah tadah hujan


Wage Ratna Rohaeni(1*), Untung Susanto(2)

(1) Scopus ID: 56888828500, Balai Besar Penelitian Tanaman Padi, Indonesia
(2) ,  
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Cekaman kekeringan hampir terjadi setiap tahun pada sawah tadah hujan. Salah satu teknologi untuk mengatasinya adalah dengan penanaman padi toleran kekeringan. Perakitan varietas toleran kekeringan terus dilakukan dengan mengevaluasi galur-galur yang ditujukan untuk stress kekeringan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyeleksi, mengevaluasi penurunan hasil, dan mengetahui indeks sensitivitas cekaman kekeringan pada galur-galur tadah hujan hasil seleksi generasi lanjut. Percobaan seleksi cekaman kekeringan dilakukan pada Maret – November 2016 dengan materi genetik sebanyak 135 galur dan Cek Mekongga yang ditanam pada kondisi stress kekeringan (61-72 centibar/Kpa) dan evaluasi galur – galur terseleksi dilakukan pada Februari – Juli 2017 dengan menggunakan rancangan acak kelompok 3 ulangan. Hasil kegiatan seleksi memperoleh sebanyak 19 galur terbaik memiliki toleransi terhadap stres kekeringan untuk dilanjutkan pada kegiatan evaluasi lebih lanjut di kondisi sawah tadah hujan kondisi optimum. Hasil penelitian evaluasi 19 galur menunjukkan sebanyak 4 galur toleran yaitu BP17586-2-0-JK-3-IND-2-SKI-10-PWK-1-SKI-2 (ISK 0.49), BP18354-1-2-JK-3-IND-1-SKI-3-PWK-1-SKI-1 (ISK 0.49), BP18360-2-3-JK-1-IND-1-SKI-7-PWK-2SKI-1 (ISK 0.16), dan BP18406c-JK-1-IND-0-SKI-3-PWK-2-SKI-1 (ISK 0.1). Galur BP18354-1-2-JK-3-IND-1-SKI-3-PWK-1-SKI-1 (Y = 4,77 ton ha-1) adalah galur terbaik yang memiliki potensi hasil tinggi lebih baik dari cek Inpari 38 Tadah Hujan dan memiliki toleransi terhadap cekaman kekeringan. Galur ini potensial untuk diuji lebih lanjut dan dikembangkan di sawah tadah hujan.

 

                                                    ABSTRACT

Drought stress almost occurs every year in rainfed rice fields. One of the technologies to overcome is by planting drought tolerant varieties rice. Therefore, the assembly of drought tolerant varieties is carried out continuously by evaluating lines intended for drought stress. This study aimed to select, evaluate the decline in yield, and determine the drought tolerance index of rainfed lines resulting from advanced generation selection. Study-1 of drought stress selection experiment was carried out in WS 1 2016 (March – November) with 135 genetic lines and Mekongga as susceptible checks and Inpari 38 as resistant check planted in drought stress conditions (61-72 centibar / Kpa), and study-2 was an evaluation of selected strains carried out in WS 1 2017 (February – July) with 19 selected lines and 3 checks (Mekongga and Ciherang as susceptible check and Inpari 38 as resistant checks) by using a randomized block design with 3 replications. The results of the selection activities (Study-1) obtained as many as 19 of the best lines which had tolerance to drought stress and these lines were continued in further evaluation activities in rainfed lowland with optimum conditions (Study-2). The results showed that 4 of 19 lines were tolerant namely BP17586-2-0-JK-3-IND-2-SKI-10-PWK-1-SKI-2 (DSI - drought stress sensitivity index = 0.49), BP18354-1 -2-JK-3-IND-1-SKI-3-PWK-1-SKI-1 (DSI 0.49), BP18360-2-3-JK-1-IND-1-SKI-7-PWK-2SKI-1 (DSI 0.16), and BP18406c-JK-1-IND-0-SKI-3-PWK-2-SKI-1 (DSI 0.1). The BP18354-1-2-JK-3-IND-1-SKI-3-PWK-1-SKI-1 (Y = 4.77 tons ha-1) line was the best strain that had the potential for high yield better than the Inpari 38 Rainfed Check and had tolerance to stress. This strain has the potential to be further tested and developed in rain-fed rice fields.


Keywords


galur, indeks sensitivitas cekaman, kekeringan, tadah hujan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afa, L. O., Purwoko, B. S., Junaedi, A., Haridjaja, O., & Dewi, I. S. (2013). Deteksi Dini Toleransi Padi Hibrida terhadap Kekeringan menggunakan PEG 6000 Early Detection of Hybrid Rice Tolerance to Drought Using PEG 6000. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia, 41(1),_9–15.https://doi.org/10.24831/

jai.v41i1.7070

Ai, N.S., Tondais S.M., & B. R. (2010). Evaluasi Indikator Toleransi Cekaman Kekeringan Pada Fase Perkecambahan Padi (Oryza Sativa L.). Jurnal Biologi, 14(2),50–54.https://doi.org/10.24843/

jbiounud

Akbar, M. R., Purwoko, B. S., Dewi, I. S., & Suwarno, D. W. B. (2018). Penentuan Indeks Seleksi Toleransi Kekeringan Galur Dihaploid Padi Sawah Tadah Hujan pada Fase Perkecambahan. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy), 46(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v46i2.19086

Gómez-Luciano, L. B., Su, S.-H., Wu, C.-W., & Hsieh, C.-H. (2012). Establishment of a Rapid Screening Method for Drought Tolerance of Rice Genotypes at Seedling Stage. Journal of International Cooperation, 7(2), 107–122. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/258794979_Establishment_of_a_Rapid_Screening_Method_for_Drought_Tolerance_of_Rice_Genotypes_at_Seedling_Stage/file/72e7e52a7ab69db326.pdf.

IRRI. (2013). Standard Evaluation System for Rice. International Rice Research Instiitute, June, 55. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1522164

Kano-Nakata, M., Inukai, Y., Wade, L. J., Siopongco, J. D., &

Yamauchi, A. (2011). Root development, water uptake, and shoot dry matter production under water defi cit conditions in two cssls of rice: Functional roles of root plasticity. Plant Production Science, 14(4), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.14.307

Nugroho, S. P. (2018). 4,87 Juta Jiwa Penduduk Terdampak Kekeringan Yang Tersebar Di 4.053 Desa. BNPB Editorial. file:///D:/Wage 2020/KTI wage 2020/J. Agrotek UIN/Literatur 3654-20259-2-ED2/Nugroho 2018.html

Praba, M. L., Cairns, J. E., Babu, R. C., & Lafitte, H. R. (2009). Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00341.x

Ramadhani, F., Runtunuwu, E., & Syahbuddin, H. (2013). Sistem Teknologi Informasi Kalender Tanam Terpadu. Informatika Pertanian, 22(2), 103.https://doi.org/10.21082/ip.v22n2.2013.p103-112

Rohman, A., Helmiyati, S., Hapsari, M., & Setyaningrum, D. L. (2014). Rice in health and nutrition. International Food Research Journal, 21(1), 13–24. Retrieved_from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287284991_Rice_in_health_and_nutrition

Sandhu, N., & Kumar, A. (2017). Bridging the rice yield gaps under drought: QTLs, genes, and their use in breeding programs. Agronomy, 7(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7020027

Serraj, R., McNally, K. L., Slamet-Loedin, I., Kohli, A., Haefele, S. M., Atlin, G., & Kumar, A. (2011). Drought resistance improvement in rice: An integrated genetic and resource management strategy. Plant Production Science, 14(1),1–14. https://doi.org/10.1626/p ps.14.1

Shekhar, H., Bidhan, G., & Viswavidyalaya, C. K. (2017). Drought Tolerance Indices for Screening Some of Rice Genotypes. International Journal of Advanced Biological Research, 7(2017), 671–674. Retrieved_from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321714630

Sitaresmi, T., Wening, R. H., Rakhmi, A. T., Yunani, N., & Susanto, U. (2013). Pemanfaatan Plasma Nutfah Padi Varietas Lokal dalam Perakitan Varietas Unggul. Iptek Tanaman Pangan, 8(1), 22–30. Retrieved from http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/ippan/article/view/2555

Suardi, D., & Abdullah, B. (2003). Padi Liar Tetua Toleran Kekeringan. Buletin Plasma Nutfah, 9(1), 33–38. Retrieved from http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/bpn/article/view/6041/5235

Sulaiman, A. A., Simatupang, P., Las, I., Hermanto, Kariyasa, I. K., Syahyuti, Sumaryanto, S., Suwandi, & Subagyono, K. (2017). Sukses Swasembada Indonesia Menjadi Lumbung Pangan Dunia 2045 (T. Sudaryanto & Hermanto (eds.); 1st ed.). Perpustakaan Sekjen Kementan. Retrieved from http://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/8623

Suwarno, P. M., Wirnas, D., & Junaedi, D. A. (2016). Kendali Genetik Toleransi Kekeringan pada Padi Sawah (Oryza sativa L.). Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy), 44(2),119. https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v44i2.13477

Tubur, H. W., Chozin, M. A., Santosa, E., & Junaedi, A. (2012). Respon Agronomi Varietas Padi terhadap Periode Kekeringan pada Sistem Sawah. Respon Agronomi Varietas Padi Terhadap Periode Kekeringan Pada Sistem Sawah, 40(3), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v40i3.6796

Wening, R. H., & Susanto, U. (2014). Skrining Plasma Nutfah Padi Terhadap Screening of Germplasm Rice To Drought Stress. Widyariset, 17(2), 193–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/widyariset.17.2.2014.193-203

Widyastuti, Y., Purwoko, B. S., & Yunus, D. M. (2016). Identifikasi Toleransi Kekeringan Tetua Padi Hibrida pada Fase Perkecambahan Menggunakan Polietilen Glikol (PEG) 6000. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy), 44(3), 235. https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v44i3.13784




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/3654

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Licence

Jurnal Agro (J. Agro: ISSN 2407-7933) by http://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/ja/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.