Kehujjahan Sunnah dalam Wacana Ingkar Sunnah Kamal Azmi


Reza Pahlevi Dalimunthe(1), Sahlan Muhammad Faqih(2), Wahyudi Wahyudi(3*)

(1) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(2) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(3) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


In the early days of Islam, the seeds of the followers of Ingkar Sunnah had appeared, namely Shi'ah and Khawarij, followed by Muktazilah. Their blasphemy in denying the Sunnah is the lust and fanaticism of their group. Ingkar Sunnah thought was not in demand for several centuries, then appeared again in the early 14th century Hijriyah. The development of the modern Ingkar Sunnah is more progressive than its predecessor. Among the driving factors is the orientalist study of the Sunnah which has influenced the views of Muslim scholars on the Sunnah. In addition, the colonialism (isti'mârî) which occurred in several countries with large Muslim majority such as India, increased the sincerity of the Orientalists to attack the Sunnah to its roots. Their efforts were successful, with the emergence of Ingkar Sunnah groups in various regions, including: Madrasah al-'Ashrâniyyah in India, Madrasah al-Qur'âniyyin in India, and Madrasah al-'Aqlâniyyah in Egypt. This study uses a qualitative method, data collection using literature study, while the approach is historical-thematic. This study found that the modern Ingkar Sunnah group was more organized than the earlier generations. Their evidence comes from the influence of Western thought and the logic they build; so that the groups will accept the hadith if it is rational.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Ghauri, S. A. M. (2017). Inkâr as-Sunnah; Târîkhuhu wa firâquhu wa dawâfi’uhu. Penerbit KUIS.

As-Sahrastâniy, A. F. M. bin A. al-K. (n.d.). al-Milal wa an-Nihal. Maktabah at-Taufiqiyyah.

Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah, P. D. (2015). Ushul al-Fiqh al-Islamiy (Juz 1). Dar El-Fikr.

Azmi, K. (2017). Pengaruh Pemikiran Islam Liberal dalam Fahaman Anti Hadis. Journal INHAD.

Baksya, K. H. I. (2000). al-Qur’âniyyûn wa Syubhâtuhum hawla as-Sunnah (Cet ke-2). Maktabah el-Shiddiq.

Binder, L. (1988). Islamic Liberalism: A Critique of Development Ideologies.

Dalimunthe, R. P. (2017). ‘Syaz’ dan Permasalahannya. Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 1(2), 89–96.

Hammad, Nafidz Husein, D. (1993). Mukhtalaf al-Hadîts bayna al-Fuqahâ` wal-Muhadditsîn. Dar el-Wafa`.

Jalal, M. A. R. (2014). Al-Adillah al-Muttafaq ‘Alaiha. Maktabah al-Iman.

Jumantoro, S. M., & Amin, T. (2005). Kamus Ilmu Ushul Fikih. Amzah.

Muhsini, M. A. (2008). Shirâth al-Haqq fil-Ma’ârif al-Islâmiyyah wal-Ushûl al-I’tiqâdiyyah (Juz 1). Dzawil Qurba.

Rahman, M. T. (1995). Kewahyuan Hadits (Sebuah Penjelasan bagi Kaum Inkar al-Hadits). Risalah, 33(4), 31–33.

Sambas, S. (1997). Mantik Kaidah Berpikir Islami. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suhandi. (2015). Ingkar Sunnah: Sejarah, Argumentasi dan Respon Ulama Hadis. Jurnal Al-Dzikra, 9(1), 93–115.

Sukardi. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Cet ke-11). Bumi Aksara.

Syalabi, R. (1982). As-Sunnah al-Islâmiyyah baina Istbât al-Fâhimîn wa Rafdh al-Jâhilîn. Dar el-Qalam.

Ya’qub, A. M. (1995). Kritik Hadis. Pustaka Firdaus.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v1i1.11467

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JIS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.>

 

Published by: Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung