The Meaning of Religious Moderation According to Franz Magnis-Suseno: A Phenomenological Approach

R.F. Bhanu Viktorahadi

Abstract


Religious moderation is necessary to guarantee social stability against the unwanted ideological force and even physical collisions in society. Social and religious lives are not isolated but must be integrated into one another. Building an educated and open-minded religious community is required to achieve this goal. The ideal religious moderation should be created through active participation from all members of diverse religious communities to achieve the same goals based on togetherness, inclusive attitude, respect, and mutual understanding related to performing certain rituals and doctrines of each religion. The variety of typologies of interfaith relations, such as exclusivism, inclusivism, and pluralism, are commonly formulated to bring these diversities into the further step of harmonious religious dialogues. This article uses the phenomenological approach in studying the meaning of religious moderation, according to Franz Magnis-Suseno. Specifically, according to Magnis-Suseno, someone just can talk about religious moderation if there is a willingness to accept and recognize plurality. That is, assuming the difference. Religious moderation means getting relatives or groups, even though their views, beliefs, and beliefs are different.

Keywords


religious tolerance; phenomenological approach; plurality harmony; dialog; acceptance of difference

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, M. Amin. (1992). “The Idea of Universality of Ethical Norms in Kant and Al-Ghazali.” Ankara: TrkiyeDiyanet Vakfi.

Adams, Charles J. (1976). “Islamic Religious Tradition” Dalam Leonard Binder (Ed.) The Study of The Middle East: Research and Scholarship in the Humanities and the Social Science.” Canada: John Wiley and Sonc, Inc.

Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri. (2012). “Fenomenologi Agama: Pendekatan Fenomenologi Untuk Memahami Agama.” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 20(2):271–304.

Bertens, Kees. (1981). Filsafat Barat Dalam Abad XX. Gramedia.

Casanova, Jose. (2008). “Public Religions Revisited.” in Religion: Beyond the Concept. New York: Fordham Universiti Press.

Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage publications.

Delfgaauw, Bernard. (2001). “Filsafat Abad 20, Terj.” Soejono Soemargono. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

E.C., Cuff, and G. C. F. Payne. (1980). Perspective in Sociology. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Edgar, Andrew, and Peter Sedgwick. (2005). Key Concepts in Cultural Theory. Routledge.

Filmer, Paul. (1972). New Directions in Sociological Theory. MIT Press.

Hasbiansyah, O. (2008). “Pendekatan Fenomenologi: Pengantar Praktik Penelitian Dalam Ilmu Sosial Dan Komunikasi.” MediaTor (Jurnal Komunikasi) 9(1):163–80.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. (2018). Hegel: The Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press.

Husserl, E. (1931). Phenomenology and Anthropology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

Ijsseling, Samuel. (1979). “Hermeneutics and Textuality: Questions Concerning Phenomenology.” Research in Phenomenology 9:1–16.

Jaya, Suprana. (1997). “Buku Dan Kontemplasi, Dalam Buku Membangun Kualitas Bangsa.” Yogyakarta, Kanisius.

Kinloch, Graham C. (2005). “Sociological Theory: Development and Major Paradigm.” Bandung: Pustaka Setia 35.

Kuper, Adam, and Jessica Kuper. (1996). Ensiklopedi Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Terj. Haris Munandar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kusumohamidjojo, Budiono. (2000). Kebhinnekaan Masyarakat Di Indonesia: Suatu Problema Filsafat Kebudayaan. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Lorens, Bagus. (1996). “Kamus Filsafat.” Jakarta: Gramedia.

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (1987). Etika Dasar. Masalah-Masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral. Penerbit PT Kanisius.

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (1991a). Berfilsafat Dari Konteks. Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (1991b). “Wayang Dan Panggilan Manusia.”

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (1992a). “Filsafat Kebudayaan Politik: Butir-Butir Pemikiran Kritis.”

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (1992b). Filsafat Sebagai Ilmu Kritis. Penerbit PT Kanisius.

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (1995). Mencari Sosok Demokrasi. Sebuah Telaah Filosofis. Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (1998). Mencari Makna Kebangsaan. Penerbit Kanisius.

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (2001). Etika Jawa: Sebuah Analisa Falsafi Tentang Kebijaksanaan Hidup Jawa. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Utama.

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (2004). Menjadi Saksi Kristus. Di Tengah Masyarakat Majemuk. Penerbit Obor.

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. (n.d.) “Agama, Kebangsaan Dan Demokrasi Nurcholish Madjid Dan Kemanusiaan.” Orasi Ilmiah Dalam Rangka Nurcholish Madjid Memorial Lecture VIII.

Magnis-Suseno SJ, Franz. (2000). Kuasa Dan Moral. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Magnis-Suseno SJ, Franz. (2008). “Masa Depan Dunia Pendidikan Tinggi Agama Islam Di Indonesia Di Era Globalisasi.” in Transformasi IAIN Menjadi UIN Menuju Research University. Bandung: Gunung Djati Press.

Mellisa, Ayu, and Husni Mubarok. (2015). Agama, Keterbukaan, Dan Demokrasi. Harapan Dan Tantangan. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Agama dan Demokrasi [PUSAD] Yayasan Paramadina.

Morrison, and McIntyre. (1972). Schools and Socialization. London: Penguin Harmondsworth.

Moustakas, Clark. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage publications.

Mustari, M., and M. T. Rahman. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.

Rusli, Rusli. (2008). “Pendekatan Fenomenologi Dalam Studi Agama Konsep, Kritik Dan Aplikasi.” Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 2(2):141–53.

Silverman, David. (2015). Interpreting Qualitative Data. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage Publications.

Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. (1959). Comparative Religion: Whither--and Why? University of Chicago Press.

Suseno, Franz Magnis. (1993). “Etika Dasar Masalah-Masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral.”

Suseno, Franz Magnis. (1998). “13 Tokoh Etika Sejak Zaman Yunani Sampai Abad XIX.”

Suseno, Franz Magnis. (2019). “Negara Harus Intoleran Terhadap Intoleransi.” Kompas.Com.

Waardenburg, Jacques. (1973). “Classical Approaches to the Studies of Religions.” Vol. I.

Wach, Joachim. (1960). The Comparative Study of Religion. New York and London: Columbia University Press.

Walzer, Michael. (1997). On Toleration. Yale University Press.

Watt, James H., and Sjef A. Van den Berg. (1995). Research Methods for Communication Science. Allyn & Bacon.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v2i2.17912

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JIS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.>

 

Published by: Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Supported By: Prodi S2 Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung