Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) in the Perspectives of Philosophy, Neuroscience, Neuro-Psychology, and Tasawuf
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v6i2.55101Keywords:
consciousness, embodied cognition, language, neuroscience, phenomenology, philosophy of mind, spiritualityAbstract
This study critically examines Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) through the combined lenses of philosophy and modern neuroscience. It aims to investigate how NLP conceptualizes the relationship between mind, language, and embodied experience, and to what extent its theoretical foundations align with contemporary understandings of consciousness. Employing a qualitative, library-based methodology using conceptual analysis, hermeneutics, and comparative neurocognitive review, this study analyzes primary NLP formulations by Bandler and Grinder alongside philosophical perspectives from Wittgenstein, Merleau-Ponty, and Gadamer, as well as neuroscientific findings on neuroplasticity, mirror neurons, and predictive processing. The findings reveal that NLP provides a constructivist model of consciousness in which meaning, perception, and behavior emerge from the dynamic interaction of neural processes, linguistic structures, and subjective experience. However, its scientific validity remains limited due to the scarcity of consistent empirical evidence, and several NLP techniques rely heavily on anecdotal claims. The study also finds that NLP’s theoretical framework tends to simplify complex ontological questions about consciousness, indicating the need for deeper engagement with phenomenology and neurophilosophy. A major limitation of this research lies in its reliance on textual analysis without empirical examination of NLP practices in therapeutic or cultural settings. Practically, the study recommends a more rigorous integration of NLP with contemporary neuroscience and ethical guidelines to prevent misuse in interpersonal communication, therapy, and political persuasion.
Contribution: This research contributes to the philosophy of mind by proposing a synthesis of NLP with neuroscience and phenomenology, presenting it as a Neuro-Linguistic-Phenomenological Programming framework. Practically, it offers a conceptual foundation for the responsible application of NLP in education, communication, and religious or spiritual studies, emphasizing ethical awareness and evidence-based practice.
References
Ali, A. M. S., & Al-Muslimi, F. K. A. M. (2024). The Effectiveness of Neuro-Linguistic Programming Techniques in Reducing Students’ EFL Oral Disfluencies. TESOL and Technology Studies, 5(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.48185/tts.v5i1.1058
Alkhouri, K. I. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Study of the Psychology of Religion. Religions, 15(3), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030290
Alpaslan, C. M., & Mitroff, I. I. (2024). Moral Foundations of Spirituality and Religion Through Natural Language Processing. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 21(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.51327/WLON1757
Amirhosseini, M. H., & Wall, J. (2022). A Machine Learning Approach to Identify the Preferred Representational System of a Person. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(12), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6120112
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). The structure of magic (Vol. 1). Science and Behavior Books Palo Alto, CA.
Barrett, N. F. (2023). Religious Symbolism and the Experience of Life as Meaningful: Addition, Enhancement, or Both? Religions, 14(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010088
Bassi, D., Fomsgaard, S., & Pereira-Fariña, M. (2024). Decoding persuasion: a survey on ML and NLP methods for the study of online persuasion. Frontiers in Communication, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1457433
Beinborn, L., & Hollenstein, N. (2024). Cognitive Plausibility in Natural Language Processing. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43260-6
Berger, J., & Packard, G. (2022). Using natural language processing to understand people and culture. American Psychologist, 77(4), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000882
Bhuyan, B. P., Ramdane-Cherif, A., Tomar, R., & Singh, T. P. (2024). Neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence: a survey. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(21), 12809–12844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09960-z
Birknerova, Z., Misko, D., Ondrijova, I., Tomkova, A., Cema, V., & Cigarska, B. N. (2022). Identification of preferred representational sensory system in neuro-linguistic programming. Marketing i Menedžment Innovacij, 13(3), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.3-010.
Bliss, T. V. P., & Lømo, T. (1973). Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. The Journal of Physiology, 232(2), 331–356.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Bruehler, B. B. (2022). Sacred Stories for Human Beings with Bodies and Brains. Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture, 52(4), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461079221133109
Butler, C., Michael, N., & Kissane, D. (2025). Reclaiming ritual in palliative care: A hermeneutic narrative review. Palliative and Supportive Care, 23, e49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001767
Camargo, D. K. (2025). Cartesian Dualism: Bridging Descartes’ Mind-Body Dichotomy to Contemporary Psychology and Mental Health. Journal of Contemporary Philosophical and Anthropological Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jcpas.v3i2.513
Carrara, A. (2025). A unified understanding of the human mind — a neuroethical perspective. CNS Spectrums, 30(1), e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S109285292400049X
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). Does a rock implement every finite-state automaton? Synthese, 108(3), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413692
Churchland, M. M., Cunningham, J. P., Kaufman, M. T., Foster, J. D., Nuyujukian, P., Ryu, S. I., & Shenoy, K. V. (2012). Neural population dynamics during reaching. Nature, 487(7405), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11129
Cogliati, J. J., Goosey, F. W., Grinder, M. T., Pascoe, B. A., ROSS, R. J., & Williams, C. J. (2005). Realizing the promise of visualization in the theory of computing. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 5(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/1141904.1141909
Coletta, W. J. (2025). The Word-in-Conversation as evolutionary learning. In Spiritual Consciousness as Evolutionary Learning (pp. 245–257). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003402572-21
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dagan, I. (2024). Trans-Belief: Developing Artificial Intelligence NLP Model Capable of Religious-Belief-like Cognitive Processes for Expected Enhanced Cognitive Ability. Religions, 15(6), 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15060655
Damasio, M. J., Henriques, S., & Costa, C. (2012). Virtual communities and social activities: reframing the online experience. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 8(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2012.046257
Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Penguin.
Drigas, A., & Mitsea, E. (2021). Neuro-linguistic programming & vr via the 8 pillars of metacognition x 8 layers of consciousness x 8 Intelligences. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 26, 159.
Felipe-Ruiz, A. (2024). Lexical, sentiment and correlation analysis of sacred writings. A tale of cultural influxes and different ways to interpret reality. Natural Language Processing Journal, 9, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100121
Fried Schnitman, D., Prigogine, I., Morin, E., Foerster, H. von, Glasersfeld, E. von, Fox Keller, E., Castagnino, M., Guattari, F., Jiménez, J., & Wigley, M. (1995). Nuevos paradigmas, cultura y subjetividad. In Nuevos paradigmas, cultura y subjetividad (p. 457).
Friston, K. (2012). The history of the future of the Bayesian brain. NeuroImage, 62(2), 1230–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.004
Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and Method. Sheed and Ward.
Gallese, V. (2003). A neuroscientific grasp of concepts: from control to representation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1315
Girju, R. (2023). Understanding Lived Experience: Bridging Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing with Humanities and Social Sciences. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1292(1), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1292/1/012020
Gran, S. (2021). Using NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) methods in teaching and learning: case studies on the potential and impact of NLP methods on learning and learners. Dissertation, Duisburg, Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/74395
Gray, K., MacCormack, J. K., Henry, T., Banks, E., Schein, C., Armstrong-Carter, E., Abrams, S., & Muscatell, K. A. (2022). The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(6), 1199–1222. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000310
Guerrero, L. E., Castillo, L. F., Arango-López, J., & Moreira, F. (2025). A systematic review of integrated information theory: a perspective from artificial intelligence and the cognitive sciences. Neural Computing and Applications, 37(11), 7575–7607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08328-z
Haridy, S., Ismail, R. M., Badr, N., & Hashem, M. (2023). An Ontology Development Methodology Based on Ontology-Driven Conceptual Modeling and Natural Language Processing: Tourism Case Study. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020101
Heap, M. (1988). Neuro-linguistic programming. Hypnosis: Current Clinical, Experimental and Forensic Practices, 268–280.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The first stage of perception: growth of the assembly. The Organization of Behavior, 4(60), 60–78.
Ivić, I. D. (2024). Old Problems in the Light of New Discoveries (pp. 207–304). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49757-5_5
Jahan, J., Tariq, M., & Nadeem, M. (2022). The Effects of Neuro-linguistic Programming on a Psychotherapist’s Communication Patterns: A Case Study. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 3(II). https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2022(3-II)13
Johnson, M., & Barlow, R. (2024). Phygital marketing through the lens of neuroscience and phenomenology: an interpretivist account. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 27(3), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-07-2023-0098
Kabrel, M., Tulver, K., & Aru, J. (2024). The journey within: mental navigation as a novel framework for understanding psychotherapeutic transformation. BMC Psychiatry, 24(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05522-8
Kaur, V. (2024). Mirror neurons and neuroplasticity: The dyadic neurological foundations bridging entrepreneur-level and enterprise-level capabilities. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 22, e00497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00497
Korzybski, A. (1958). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Institute of GS.
Lake, B. M., & Murphy, G. L. (2023). Word meaning in minds and machines. Psychological Review, 130(2), 401–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000297
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., & Sowa, J. F. (1999). Review of Philosophy in the Flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Computational Linguistics, 25(4), 631–634.
LeDoux, J. (2003). The Emotional Brain, Fear, and the Amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 23(4–5), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025048802629
Lee, K. M., Ferreira-Santos, F., & Satpute, A. B. (2021). Predictive processing models and affective neuroscience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 131, 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.009
Leeson, W., Resnick, A., Alexander, D., & Rovers, J. (2019). Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Qualitative Public Health Research: A Proof of Concept Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919887021
Leyton, D. (2022). Neoliberalising working-class subjectification through affirmative action policies: managerial leadership and ontological coaching in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 37(3), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1819569
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Un inédit de Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 67(4), 401–409.
Mihalcea, R., Biester, L., Boyd, R. L., Jin, Z., Perez-Rosas, V., Wilson, S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2024). How developments in natural language processing help us in understanding human behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(10), 1877–1889. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01938-0
Moleka, P. (2025). A New Epistemology of Intelligence: Rethinking Knowledge Through Noesology. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202502.1377.v2
Mondal, P. (2024). A Critical Perspective on the (Neuro)biological Foundations of Language and Linguistic Cognition. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 58(4), 1501–1525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09741-0
Moraru, C., & Di Leo, J. R. (2021). The Bloomsbury Handbook of World Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing CN - PN. https://digital.casalini.it/9781501361968
Munsoor, M. S. (2021). Conceptual Framework for Worship (Ibadah) (pp. 17–91). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66131-1_2
Novotny, E., Frank, M. G., & Grizzard, M. (2021). A Laboratory Study Comparing the Effectiveness of Verbal and Nonverbal Rapport-Building Techniques in Interviews. Communication Studies, 72(5), 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2021.1975141
Nualláin, S. Ó. (2014). One Magisterium: How Nature Knows Through Us. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Northwestern University Press.
Permezel, F., Alty, J., Harding, I. H., & Thyagarajan, D. (2023). Brain Networks Involved in Sensory Perception in Parkinson’s Disease: A Scoping Review. Brain Sciences, 13(11), 1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13111552
Prabhumoye, S., Boldt, B., Salakhutdinov, R., & Black, A. W. (2021). Case Study: Deontological Ethics in NLP. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 3784–3798. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.297
Ray, A. (2015). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. The Permanente Journal, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/14-211
Ribes-Iñesta, E. (2006). Human Behavior as Language: Some Thoughts on Wittgenstein. Behavior and Philosophy, 34, 109–121. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759523
Richelli, L., Arioli, M., & Canessa, N. (2025). Neurosustainability: A Scoping Review on the Neuro-Cognitive Bases of Sustainable Decision-Making. Brain Sciences, 15(7), 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15070678
Ryum, T., & Nikolaos Kazantzis. (2024). Elucidating the process-based emphasis in cognitive behavioral therapy. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 33, 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100819
Sanna, M. (2025). Proprioceptive Resonance and Multimodal Semiotics: Readiness to Act, Embodied Cognition, and the Dynamics of Meaning. NeuroSci, 6(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci6020042
Searle, J. R. (2004). Mind: A brief introduction. Oxford university press.
Shan, S. (2025). Towards Reflexive AI: A Comprehensive Exploration of Enhancing Social Science Research Through NLP (pp. 765–792). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84460-7_49
Sharpley, C. F. (1987). Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?
Stein, B. E., Meredith, M. A., & Wallace, M. T. (1993). Chapter 8 The visually responsive neuron and beyond: multisensory integration in cat and monkey (pp. 79–90). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60359-3
Stuart, S. A. (2024). Why language clouds our ascription of understanding, intention and consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 23(5), 1031–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-024-09970-1
Subotić, V. (2023). Linguistic Competence and New Empiricism in Philosophy and Science.
Thagard, P. (2012). The cognitive science of science: Explanation, discovery, and conceptual change. Mit Press.
Truba, H., Khrapatyi, S., Harashchuk, K., Shvets, D., & Proskurnia, A. (2024). Psycholinguistic underpinnings of image formation: Suggestion and manipulation in the educational network discourse. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101496
Varela, F. J. (1991). Organism: A Meshwork of Selfless Selves (pp. 79–107). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3406-4_5
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York, 41973(1968), 40.
Walther, J. B., & Lew, Z. (2022). Self-transformation online through alternative presentations of self: a review, critique, and call for research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 46(3), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2096662
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhamad Atamimi, Muhtar Solihin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).