Psychological Analysis of Public Behavior and Perception in Waste Burning Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jops.v4i2.50442Keywords:
Environmental behavior, Perception, Waste burningAbstract
Waste burning remains a common practice in many communities despite its negative impacts on health and the environment. This topic was chosen due to its urgency in the context of air pollution, particularly following the 2022 fire at the Antang landfill in Makassar, which highlighted weaknesses in waste management systems. This study aims to explore how low risk perception and strong social norms are associated with the persistence of waste burning behavior. This research employed a qualitative approach with a phenomenological method, involving five informants consisting of both perpetrators and those affected by waste burning. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and participatory observation, and analyzed using thematic techniques. The findings indicate that waste burning behavior is influenced by habits, limited waste collection services, and social norms that support the practice. Although the community is aware of health risks such as respiratory problems, stress, and decreased quality of life, the lack of alternative waste management methods reinforces this behavior. In conclusion, waste burning practices are primarily driven by psychological factors and inadequate environmental conditions. This study recommends improving waste management services, increasing public education about pollution hazards, and strengthening social norms that encourage environmentally friendly practices.
References
Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood cliffs.
Evans, G. W., & Stecker, R. (2004). Motivational consequences of environmental stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00076-8.
Feriady, M., Farliana, N., & Kardoyo, K. (2024). Modelling Indonesian student pro-environmental behaviour: Empirical study of value believe norm theory. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 568, p. 03004). EDP Sciences.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Han, H. (2015). Travelers' pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism management, 47, 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., ... & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352
Jampala, M. B., & Shivnani, T. (2024). Investigating behavior, attitude and intention towards waste segregation in tier II cities of India using theory of planned behavior. Cleaner Waste Systems, 9, 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100188
Kim, Y. (2023). A study of the integrated model with norm activation model and theory of planned behavior: applying the green hotel’s corporate social responsibilities. Sustainability, 15(5), 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054680
Liu, P., Teng, M., & Han, C. (2020). How does environmental knowledge translate into pro-environmental behaviors?: The mediating role of environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions. Science of the total environment, 728, 138126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138126
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative health research, 26(13), 1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). Academic Press.
Setiawan, B., Afiff, A. Z., & Heruwasto, I. (2021). Personal norm and pro-environmental consumer behavior: an application of norm activation theory. ASEAN Marketing Journal, 13(1), 3.
Soemantri, T. S., Anzhari, K., Kosasih, O., & Murwani, I. A. (2025). Value-Belief-Norm Theory and Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Study on Blue Collar Workers in Jakarta. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics & Management, 5(2).
Statistik, B. P. Badan Pusat Statistik 2017: 335–58.
Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
UN Environment. (2018). Single-Use Plastics: A Roadmap for Sustainability. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
Wiedinmyer, C., Yokelson, R. J., & Gullett, B. K. (2014). Global emissions of trace gases, particulate matter, and hazardous air pollutants from open burning of domestic waste. Environmental science & technology, 48(16), 9523-9530. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502250z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published on the E-Journal of Psychology website is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral right remains the author of the script).
2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-SA), which means that the Journal of Psychology reserves the right to save, transmit media / format, manage in database form, , maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it continues to include the name of the Author as the owner of Copyright.
3. Printed and published print and electronic manuscripts are open access for any purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
