Prophetic Leadership Scale’s Validation and the Tendency of Normative Response
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v3i2.5770Keywords:
confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, discriminant validity, prophetic leadership, reliability, social desirability biasAbstract
This study aims to validate the prophetic leadership scale by using a quantitative approach. 202 leaders were involved in this study. Data analysis technique that has been used for construct validation is factorial validation with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), a convergent validation, discriminant validation, and social desirability bias with Pearson correlation. There are 4 instruments used in this study, namely the measuring instrument of prophetic leadership, the measuring instrument of authentic leadership as a convergent validator, the measuring instrument of religiosity as a discriminant validator, and the measuring tool of social desirability as a validator of social appropriateness bias. The prophetic leadership measurement tool measures the same construct as the authentic leadership measurement tool, and measures different constructs from the religiosity measurement tool, and the prophetic leadership measurement tool has a social appropriateness bias or the respondent's tendency to give answers in accordance with norms. The findings raise a prospect that social desirability bias’s influences fitness indices in a scale’s validation.
References
Adz-Dzakiey, H. B. (2005). Prophetic intelligence kecerdasan kenabian: Menumbuhkan potensi hakiki insani melalui pengembangan kesehatan ruhani. Islamika.
Azwar, S. (2015). Realibilitas dan validitas (Edisi Keempat). Pustaka Pelajar.
Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S10489843(99)00016-8
Beerel, A. (1997). The strategic planner as prophet and leader: A case study concerning a leading seminary illustrates the new planning skills required. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 18(3), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739710168616
Budiharto, S., & Himam, F. (2006). Konstruk teoritis dan pengukuran kepemimpinan profetik. Jurnal Psikologi, 33(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.7081
Covrig, D. M. (2000). The organizational context of moral dilemmas: The role of moral leadership in administration in making and breaking dilemmas. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190000700105
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1956). Construct validity in psychological tests. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1(July), 174–204.
Elsintania, F., & Archianti, P. (2016). Pengaruh kepemimpinan kenabian dan etos kerja islami terhadap komitmen organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Psikologi: Kajian Empiris & Non-empiris, 2(1). 41-55. https://doi.org/10.22236/JIPP-13
Fahmi, I., Takwin, B., & Muhamad, R. (2019). Nilai moral sebagai predictor orientasi politik pada anggota organisasi keagamaan. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 6(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v6i2.6260
Fairholm, G. W. (1996). Spiritual leadership: Fulfilling whole-self needs at work. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 17(5), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739610127469
Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2). 303-15.
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001
Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W., & Luthans, F. (2018). Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.5465/255979
Gill, J. K. (2002). The political price of prophetic leadership: The national council of churches and the Vietnam war. Development, 27(2), 271–300.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th edition). Prentice Hall.
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The centrality of religiosity scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
Jaenudin, U., & Tahrir. (2019). Studi religiusitas, budaya sunda, dan perilaku moral pada masyarakat kabupaten Bandung. JPIB: Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v2i1.3445
Mansyur, A. Y. (2013). Personal prophetic leadership sebagai model pendidikan karakter intrinsik atasi korupsi. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 3(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v0i1.1284
Mensch, B. S., & Kandel, D. B. (1988). Dropping out of high school and drug involvement. Sociology of Education, 61(2). 95-113.
Mick, D. G. (1996). Are studies of dark side variables cofounded by socially desirable responding? The case of materialism. The Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1086/209470
Nisrina, H. E., Faruq, M. I., Masruroh, R., Nurlatifah, S. S., & Nisa, S. K. (2020). Konstruksi alat ukur kepemimpinan spiritual dalam keluarga. JPIB: Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya, 3(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v3i1.6526
Purnomo, F. H., & Suryadi, B. (2018). Uji validitas konstruk pada instrumen religiusitas dengan metode confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I), 6(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v6i2.9190
Rahman, A. A., Azizah, N., & Royanulloh. (2020). Harapan terhadap perdamaian: Peran need of closure, fondasi moral dan latar belakang demografi. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 7(1), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v7i1.8691
Rossiter, J. R. (2011). Measurement for the social sciences: The C-OAR-SE method and why it must replace psychometrics. Springer.
Sarbini., Tahrir., Hambali, A., & Sudirman, D. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi moral disengangement siswa SMA di provinsi Jawa Barat. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 6(2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v6i2.6249
Straus, M. A. (2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Woman, 10(7), 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204265552
Thompson, N. A. (2013). Reliability & Validity. Assessment Systems.
Todaro J. F., Sears, S. F., Rodrigue, J. R., & Musto, K. (2005). Organ scarcity and the psychological pre–heart transplant evaluation : A simulation study using community residents. Progress in Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1177/152692480501500113
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
