Globalisasi, Pasca-Sekularisme, dan Pergeseran Batas-Batas Sakral
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jpiu.37453Keywords:
Post-Secularism, Religio, Secularism, SecularizationAbstract
The aim of this paper is not to close the dots through the imposition of a single understanding. The author simply wants to highlight significant points of ‘contestation’ in the way we understand or even blur the boundaries between the religious and the political. This research uses a qualitative method that is based on a literature study. We conclude that there are multiple and sometimes competing understandings of terms such as religion, secularism, secularisation and post-secular that shape and are shaped by discussions about the relationship between religion, politics and public life. For future researchers, we suggest exploring the correlation between religion, politics and the public sphere more specifically in order to create a paradigm that does not corner one another so that there is no overlap in understanding these three elements.References
Asad, T., Brown, W., Butler, J., & Mahmod, S. (2009). Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. 2.
Bardon, A., Birnbaum, M., Lee, L., & Stoeckl, K. (2015). RELIGIOUS PLURALISM A Resource Book.
Berger, P. L., Wiming, T., Sacks, J., Weigel, G., Martin, D., Davie, G., & An-Na’im, A. A. (2001). The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics. Sociology of Religion, 62(1), 131.
Böckenförde, E.-W. (1967). Die Entstehung des Staates als Vorgang der Säkularisation. In Kohlhammer (Vol. 22, Issue 2).
Bruce, S. (2002). God is Dead: Secularization in the West. In Blackwell Publishing.
Buzan, B. (2009). an Introduction to The English School of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Casanova, J. (1952). Rethinking Secularism. Oxford University Press.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. In University Of Chicago Press.
Cavanaugh, W. T. (1995). A Fire Strong Enough to Consume the House: The Wars of Religion and the Rise of the State. Modern Theology, 11(4), 397–420.
Chakrabarty, D. (2016). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference.
Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World. In United Nations University.
Choueiri, Y. (1991). Islamic fundamentalism.
Darmalaksana, W. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan. 1–6.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2019). Multiple Modernities. The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon, 129(1), 283–284.
Ferrara, P. (2012). Globalization and Post-Secularism: Religions and a Universal Common Identity. Claritas: Journal of Dialogue and Culture, 1(1), 61–70.
Gorski, P. S., Kim, D. K., Torpey, J., & Antwerpen, J. Van. (2017). The Post-Secular Question. In Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri (Vol. 01).
Herbst, J. (1997). Responding to State Failure in Africa (Vol. 21, Issue 3).
Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1997). Globalization in Question: The International Economy and The Possibilities of Governance (Vol. 4, Issue 2).
Hurd, E. S. (2009). The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton University Publisher.
Juergensmeyer, M. (1993). The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State. In The University of California Press.
Jürgen, H. (2003). The future of human nature. In 2000 Years and Beyond: Faith, Identity and the ‘Commmon Era’ (pp. 69–87).
Kayaoğlu, T. (2010). Westphalian eurocentrism in international relations theory. Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory, 12(2), 193–217.
Kulska, J., & Solarz, A. M. (2021). Post-Secular Identity? Developing a New Approach to Religion in International Relations. 1–15.
Lapidus, I. M. (1996). State and Religion in Islamic Societies. Past & Present, 151(1), 3–27.
Mandaville, P. (2016). Transnational Muslim Politics.
Mavelli, L., & Petito, F. (2012). The Postsecular in International Relations: An overview. Review of International Studies, 38(5), 931–942.
Mavelli, Luca. (2012). Security and Secularization in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 177–199.
Mendelsohn, B. (2012). God vs. Westphalia: Radical Islamist Movements and the Battle for Organising the World. Review of International Studies, 38.
Osiander, A. (2001). Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. International Organization, 251–287.
Patton, S. (2019). The Peace of Westphalia and it Affects on International Relations, Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. The Histories, 10(1), 5.
Philpott, D. (2000). The religious roots of modern international relations. World Politics, 52(2), 206–245.
Philpott, D. (2010). Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas shaped Modern International Relations. Revolutions in Sovereignty, 1–339.
Picastori, J. P. (2015). Islam in a World of Nation States. In Cambridge University Press (Vol. 1, Issue April).
Piscatori, J. (2022). Thinking About Muslim Politics. Muslim Politics Review, 1(1), 3–21.
Ramos, J. R. (2016). A Critical Interpretation of Olivier Roy: On Globalization, the Cosmopolitan, and Emerging Post-Secular Religiosities (Vol. 19, Issue 5).
Roy, O. (1994). Failure of Political Islam. Harvard University Press.
Savarkar, V. D. (1921). Essentials of Hindutva.
Sharkey, H. J. (2009). A religion, not a state: Ali ’Abd al-Raziq’s Islamic justification of political secularism. A Religion, Not a State: Ali ’Abd Al-Raziq’s Islamic Justification of Political Secularism, 40, 1–163.
Skinner, Q. (1980). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. In Thought (Vol. 55, Issue 2, pp. 229–230).
Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2016). Acts of faith. In University of California Press (Vol. 204, Issue 5).
Stenmark, M. (2022). Religion and Its Public Critics. Religions, 13(7).
Weber, M. (1922). Science as a Vocation.
Weber, M. (1946). Essays in Sociology. In Oxford Publication Press (Vol. 1, Issue April).
Werbner, P., Webb, M., & Spellman, K. (2014). The Political Aesthetics of Global Protest : The Arab Spring and Beyond. In Edinburgh University Press.
Wilson, E. K. (2009). After Secularism: Rethinking Religion in Global Politics (Issue Philpott 2002).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
