ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF ENTRY PATHWAYS ON STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AT UIN SUNAN GUNUNG DJATI BANDUNG: A STUDY ON THE CLASS OF 2022 AND 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kl.v5i2.40723Keywords:
Admission pathways, academic performance, higher education.Abstract
This study aims to analyse the influence of admission pathways (SPAN PTKIN, UM PTKIN, and Independent) on students' academic performance at UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung for the 2022 and 2023 cohorts. The research evaluates academic indicators such as GPA, credits taken, participation in seminars, and organisational involvement. Using a mixed-method design, quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire distributed to 560 students. Data were analysed with ANOVA and post hoc Games-Howell tests, while qualitative data explored students’ perceptions. Results indicate no significant differences in GPA, credits taken, seminar participation, or organisational involvement among students from different admission pathways. However, significant differences were found in the intensity of the study between UM-PTKIN and independent pathways. These findings suggest that UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung has successfully implemented an inclusive education system, ensuring equal opportunities for all students regardless of their admission pathway. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of admission pathways on student performance at PTKIN, contributing to the discourse on higher education inclusivity in Indonesia.References
Almistarihi, H. (2020). From Passion To Goal: Self Development. BookRix.
Barbee, A. C. (2016). Recipients of Major Scientific Awards a Descriptive and Predictive Analysis.
Bell, B. S., Tannenbaum, S. I., Ford, J. K., Noe, R. A., & Kraiger, K. (2017). 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000142
Bicen, H., & Kocakoyun, S. (2018). Perceptions of students for gamification approach: Kahoot as a case study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7467
Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2016). Does financial aid impact college student engagement? Evidence from the Gates Millennium Scholars Program. Research in Higher Education, 57, 653–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9402-y
Carrico, C., Matusovich, H. M., & Paretti, M. C. (2019). A qualitative analysis of career choice pathways of college-oriented rural central Appalachian high school students. Journal of Career Development, 46(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845317725603
Cimatti, B. (2016). Definition, development, assessment of soft skills and their role for the quality of organizations and enterprises. International Journal for Quality Research, 10(1), 97.
Cook, D. A., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
Dalla, D. P., & Kewuel, H. K. (2023). Ketimpangan Akses Beasiswa dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keberlangsungan Studi Mahasiswa. Educare: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.56393/educare.v3i2.1702
De Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218–231.
Fallon, K., & Stockstill, C. (2018). The condensed courtship clock: How elite women manage self-development and marriage ideals. Socius, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117753485
Freeman, R. (2017). The relationship between extracurricular activities and academic achievement.
Geller, E. S. (2016). The psychology of self-motivation. In Applied Psychology: Actively Caring for People (pp. 83–118).
Gotsis, G., & Grimani, K. (2017). The role of spiritual leadership in fostering inclusive workplaces. Personnel Review, 46(5), 908–935. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2015-0286
Heywood, J. (2000). Assessment in higher education: Student learning, teaching, programmes and institutions (Vol. 56). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Hunsaker, W. D. (2016). Spiritual leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: Relationship with Confucian values. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 13(3), 206–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2016.1159974
Iksal, I., Hayani, R. A., & Aslan, A. (2024). Strengthening character education as a response to the challenges of the times. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 4(3), 761–774.
Islam, N., Beer, M., & Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 102–112.
Kay, D., & Kibble, J. (2016). Learning theories 101: Application to everyday teaching and scholarship. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00132.2015
Kaya, A. (2015). The Relationship between Spiritual Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Research on School Principals’ Behaviors. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 597–606.
Kezar, A. J. (2023). Rethinking leadership in a complex, multicultural, and global environment: New concepts and models for higher education. Taylor & Francis.
Khasanzyanova, A. (2017). How volunteering helps students to develop soft skills. International Review of Education, 63, 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-017-9645-2
Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching students to learn and to work well with 21st century skills: Unpacking the career and life skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 1–11.
Kubiak, J., Spassiani, N., Shevlin, M., & O’Keeffe, M. (2018). Developing Post-Secondary Education Programmes for People with Intellectual Disabilities at Trinity College, the University of Dublin, Ireland. In People with Intellectual Disability Experiencing University Life (pp. 141–153). Brill.
Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Schumacker, R. (2020). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “The four paths modelâ€. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19878772
Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585
Pitman, T. (2016). Understanding ‘fairness’ in student selection: Are there differences and does it make a difference anyway? Studies in Higher Education, 41(7), 1203–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.968545
Qudratullah, M. F. (2014). Pengaruh Jalur Penerimaan Mahasiswa Dan Asal Sekolah Terhadap Prestasi Mahasiswa Di Fakultas Sains Dan Teknologi UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Jurnal Fourier, 3(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.14421/fourier.2014.31.9-15
Riezky, A. K. (2016). Hubungan Hasil Seleksi Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru dengan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Abulyatama. Jurnal Serambi Akademica, 4(2).
Ritter, B. A., Small, E. E., Mortimer, J. W., & Doll, J. L. (2018). Designing management curriculum for workplace readiness: Developing students’ soft skills. Journal of Management Education, 42(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917703679
Ruijuan, L., Srikhoa, S., & Jantharajit, N. (2023). Blending of Collaborative and Active Learning Instructional Methods to Improve Academic Performance and Self-Motivation of Vocational Students. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(4), 130–135.
Sardjito, S., Junaedi, N., Suhaeni, T., & Yuswandono, M. (2013). Kajian Seleksi Mahasiswa Baru Politeknik Negeri Bandung Melalui Jalur Penelusuran Minat dan Kemampuan (PMDK). Sigma-Mu, 5(2), 68–82.
Schimanski, L. A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000Research, 7. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1
Schudde, L., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2016). Pell grants as performance-based scholarships? An examination of satisfactory academic progress requirements in the nation’s largest need-based aid program. Research in Higher Education, 57, 943–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9413-3
Seli, H. (2019). Motivation and learning strategies for college success: A focus on self-regulated learning. Routledge.
Simamora, H. (2004). Manajemen sumber daya manusia.
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
Wechsler, H. S. (2017). The qualified student: A history of selective college admission in America. Routledge.
Wijaya, A. D. (2024). Dampak Rendahnya Self Efficacy Pada Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Dan Psikologi, 4(2), 115–126.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
