ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF ENTRY PATHWAYS ON STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AT UIN SUNAN GUNUNG DJATI BANDUNG: A STUDY ON THE CLASS OF 2022 AND 2023


Tedi Priatna(1*), Muhammad Amar Khana(2)

(1) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(2) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to analyse the influence of admission pathways (SPAN PTKIN, UM PTKIN, and Independent) on students' academic performance at UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung for the 2022 and 2023 cohorts. The research evaluates academic indicators such as GPA, credits taken, participation in seminars, and organisational involvement. Using a mixed-method design, quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire distributed to 560 students. Data were analysed with ANOVA and post hoc Games-Howell tests, while qualitative data explored students’ perceptions. Results indicate no significant differences in GPA, credits taken, seminar participation, or organisational involvement among students from different admission pathways. However, significant differences were found in the intensity of the study between UM-PTKIN and independent pathways. These findings suggest that UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung has successfully implemented an inclusive education system, ensuring equal opportunities for all students regardless of their admission pathway. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of admission pathways on student performance at PTKIN, contributing to the discourse on higher education inclusivity in Indonesia.

Keywords


Admission pathways; academic performance; higher education.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Almistarihi, H. (2020). From Passion To Goal: Self Development. BookRix.

Barbee, A. C. (2016). Recipients of Major Scientific Awards a Descriptive and Predictive Analysis.

Bell, B. S., Tannenbaum, S. I., Ford, J. K., Noe, R. A., & Kraiger, K. (2017). 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000142

Bicen, H., & Kocakoyun, S. (2018). Perceptions of students for gamification approach: Kahoot as a case study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7467

Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2016). Does financial aid impact college student engagement? Evidence from the Gates Millennium Scholars Program. Research in Higher Education, 57, 653–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9402-y

Carrico, C., Matusovich, H. M., & Paretti, M. C. (2019). A qualitative analysis of career choice pathways of college-oriented rural central Appalachian high school students. Journal of Career Development, 46(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845317725603

Cimatti, B. (2016). Definition, development, assessment of soft skills and their role for the quality of organizations and enterprises. International Journal for Quality Research, 10(1), 97.

Cook, D. A., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074

Dalla, D. P., & Kewuel, H. K. (2023). Ketimpangan Akses Beasiswa dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keberlangsungan Studi Mahasiswa. Educare: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.56393/educare.v3i2.1702

De Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218–231.

Fallon, K., & Stockstill, C. (2018). The condensed courtship clock: How elite women manage self-development and marriage ideals. Socius, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117753485

Freeman, R. (2017). The relationship between extracurricular activities and academic achievement.

Geller, E. S. (2016). The psychology of self-motivation. In Applied Psychology: Actively Caring for People (pp. 83–118).

Gotsis, G., & Grimani, K. (2017). The role of spiritual leadership in fostering inclusive workplaces. Personnel Review, 46(5), 908–935. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2015-0286

Heywood, J. (2000). Assessment in higher education: Student learning, teaching, programmes and institutions (Vol. 56). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Hunsaker, W. D. (2016). Spiritual leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: Relationship with Confucian values. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 13(3), 206–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2016.1159974

Iksal, I., Hayani, R. A., & Aslan, A. (2024). Strengthening character education as a response to the challenges of the times. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 4(3), 761–774.

Islam, N., Beer, M., & Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 102–112.

Kay, D., & Kibble, J. (2016). Learning theories 101: Application to everyday teaching and scholarship. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00132.2015

Kaya, A. (2015). The Relationship between Spiritual Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Research on School Principals’ Behaviors. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 597–606.

Kezar, A. J. (2023). Rethinking leadership in a complex, multicultural, and global environment: New concepts and models for higher education. Taylor & Francis.

Khasanzyanova, A. (2017). How volunteering helps students to develop soft skills. International Review of Education, 63, 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-017-9645-2

Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching students to learn and to work well with 21st century skills: Unpacking the career and life skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 1–11.

Kubiak, J., Spassiani, N., Shevlin, M., & O’Keeffe, M. (2018). Developing Post-Secondary Education Programmes for People with Intellectual Disabilities at Trinity College, the University of Dublin, Ireland. In People with Intellectual Disability Experiencing University Life (pp. 141–153). Brill.

Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Schumacker, R. (2020). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “The four paths model”. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19878772

Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585

Pitman, T. (2016). Understanding ‘fairness’ in student selection: Are there differences and does it make a difference anyway? Studies in Higher Education, 41(7), 1203–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.968545

Qudratullah, M. F. (2014). Pengaruh Jalur Penerimaan Mahasiswa Dan Asal Sekolah Terhadap Prestasi Mahasiswa Di Fakultas Sains Dan Teknologi UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Jurnal Fourier, 3(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.14421/fourier.2014.31.9-15

Riezky, A. K. (2016). Hubungan Hasil Seleksi Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru dengan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Abulyatama. Jurnal Serambi Akademica, 4(2).

Ritter, B. A., Small, E. E., Mortimer, J. W., & Doll, J. L. (2018). Designing management curriculum for workplace readiness: Developing students’ soft skills. Journal of Management Education, 42(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917703679

Ruijuan, L., Srikhoa, S., & Jantharajit, N. (2023). Blending of Collaborative and Active Learning Instructional Methods to Improve Academic Performance and Self-Motivation of Vocational Students. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(4), 130–135.

Sardjito, S., Junaedi, N., Suhaeni, T., & Yuswandono, M. (2013). Kajian Seleksi Mahasiswa Baru Politeknik Negeri Bandung Melalui Jalur Penelusuran Minat dan Kemampuan (PMDK). Sigma-Mu, 5(2), 68–82.

Schimanski, L. A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000Research, 7. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1

Schudde, L., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2016). Pell grants as performance-based scholarships? An examination of satisfactory academic progress requirements in the nation’s largest need-based aid program. Research in Higher Education, 57, 943–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9413-3

Seli, H. (2019). Motivation and learning strategies for college success: A focus on self-regulated learning. Routledge.

Simamora, H. (2004). Manajemen sumber daya manusia.

Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565

Wechsler, H. S. (2017). The qualified student: A history of selective college admission in America. Routledge.

Wijaya, A. D. (2024). Dampak Rendahnya Self Efficacy Pada Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Dan Psikologi, 4(2), 115–126.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kl.v5i2.40723

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Tedi Priatna, Muhammad Amar Khana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

1st Floor, Building of Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Gunung Djati
Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat

E-mail: KMultidisiplin@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Khazanah Sosial  are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International