Batsyeba: dari selingkuhan menjadi ibu Suri dan leluhur Kristus

Sonny Zaluchu, Mesiwarati Waruwu, Martina Novalina

Abstract


This study analyzes cases of adultery in the Bible between David, the King of Israel, and Bathsheba, the wife of one of his officers. The approach taken for analysis is a mixed narrative analysis with psychology and sociology perspectives. However, the theological frame remains the mainframe in the discussion, especially in finding the motive behind Bathsheba's desire to grant all of David's requests. The result is the conclusion that this narrative should not stop after sin and adultery. Without realizing it, both Bathsheba and David turned out to be in a divine setting that it could only read in the ending of the New Testament, where the descendants of David and Bathsheba became an essential element in the lineage of Judah that gave birth to Jesus the Messiah.


Keywords


Adultery; Bathsheba; David; divine setting; sin

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ademiluka, S. O. (2021). Interpreting the David–Bathsheba narrative (2 Sm 11:2–4) as a response by the church in Nigeria to masculine abuse of power for sexual assault. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.5802

Athas, G. (2013). “A Man after God’s Own Heart:” David and the Rhetoric of Election to Kingship. Journal for the Evangelical Study of the Old Testament, 2(2), 191–198.

Bill T. Arnold, & Beyer, B. E. (2015). Encountering the Old Testament. Baker Academic.

Bockmuehl, M. (2011). The Son of David and his Mother. The Journal of Theological Studies, 62(2), 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flr101

Douglas, J. . (2005). Ensiklopedi Alkitab Masa Kini Jilid 1 A-L (J. D. Douglas (Ed.); 6th ed.). Yayasan Komunikasi Bina Kasih/OMF.

Fahrul Rozi, & Nuram Mubina. (2016). Gambaran Perilaku Eksibisionis pada Perempuan dalam Komunitas Nude Photography di Jakarta. Psychopedia Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.36805/psikologi.v1i2.692

Friedman, H. (2015). What it Takes to be a Great Leader: Lessons from King David. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3979.4087

Gadpaille, W. J. (1980). Exhibitionism: Description, Assessment, and Treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137(9), 1139-a-1140. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.137.9.1139-a

Gardner, P. D. (Ed.). (1995). Encyclopedia of Bible Characthers.

Hill, A. E., & Walton, J. H. (2019). Survey Perjanjian Lama (T. Setyatmoko (Ed.); 3rd ed.). Gandum Mas.

Hill, A. E., & Walton, J. W. (2018). Survei Perjanjian Lama. Gandum Mas.

Kaylor, L. E., & Jeglic, E. L. (2019). Exhibitionism. In Handbook of Sexual Assault and Sexual Assault Prevention (pp. 745–760). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23645-8_45

Kingsbury, J. D. (1976). The Title “Son of David” in Matthew’s Gospel. Journal of Biblical Literature, 95(4), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.2307/3265574

Klein, R. W. (1999). David: Sinner and Saint in Samuel and Chronicles. Currents in Theology and Mission, 26, 104–116.

LAI. (2012). Alkitab Penuntun Hidup Berkelimpahan [Life Application Study Bible]. Gandum Mas.

Mandel, D. (2005). Who’s Who in the Bible. Bidge-Logos.

Miller, S. M. (2020). Panduan Lengkap Alkitab (W. Sairoen, E. Erliani, & R. U. Napituulu-Simorangkir (Eds.); 1st ed.). BPK Gunung Mulia.

Munar, A. M. (2010). Digital Exhibitionism: The Age of Exposure. Culture Unbound, 2(3), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.10223401

NIV. (2016). Cultural Background Study Bible. Zondervan.

Novalina, M. (2020). Keliru-Tafsir Dunia Barat Dalam Membaca Kitab Suci: Menyingkap Selubung-Selubung Kultural Yang Dapat Menyesatkan Dalam Memahami Alkitab. Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dan Musik Gereja, 4(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.37368/ja.v4i2.173

Pradita, Y. (2021). Memaknai Kisah Daud dan Batsyeba Melalui Kritik Naratif Dalam Teks 2 Samuel 11:1-27. DANUM PAMBELUM: Jurnal Teologi Dan Musik Gereja, 1(1), 37–55.

Roudotulaula, M., Rifki, M., Ismail, R. S., Sulhi, Triandsyah, S. N., & Hermawati, U. (2020). Eksibisionisme dalam Perspektif Hadis. Jurnal Kelas Menulis Mahasiswa Ushuluddin, 1–6. http://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/id/eprint/28764

Sanger, W. W. (2019). The History of Prostitution. FORUM Publishing.

Umar, H. (2004). Metode Penelitian Untuk Tesis. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Walfish, B. D. (1999). Judah and Tamar (Genesis 38) in Ancient Jewish Exegesis: Studies in Literary Form and Hermeneutics . Esther Marie Menn. The Journal of Religion, 79(3), 461–462. https://doi.org/10.1086/490460

Walton, J. H., Matthews, V. H., & Chavalas, M. C. (2000). The IVP Bible Background Commentary - Old Testament. IVP Academic.

Zaluchu, S. E. (2017). Biblical Theology: Pembahasan Metodologi dan Pendekatan Biblika dalam Membangun Teologi PL dan PB yang Alkitabiah [Biblical Theology: Discussion of Biblical Methodology and Approach in Building Biblical OT and NT Theology] (2nd ed.). Golden Gate Publishing.

Zaluchu, S. E. (2021). Metode Penelitian di dalam Manuskrip Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan. Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup, 3(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.38189/jtbh.v3i2.93

Zucker, D. J., & Reiss, M. (2015). Righting and Rewriting Genesis 38: Tamar and Judah in the Pseudepigrapha. Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture, 45(4), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146107915608592




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kt.v3i3.12710

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Sonny Zaluchu, Mesiwarati Waruwu, Martina Novalina

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.