Influence of Mahayana-Vajrayana School on the Sacred Characteristics of Theravada Vihara in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kt.v4i1.17872Keywords:
Acculturation, Sacredness, Theravada–Mahayana–Vajrayana, ViharaAbstract
After Buddha parinibbana, difference of views between his disciples in interpreting Dhamma result in the creation of three main Buddhist schools: Theravada, Mahayana, and Vajrayana. With slightly different philosophies, these schools also have their own unique architectural characteristics to represent sacredness. However, due to the absence of any architectural literature, wide interpretations of Buddhist teachings, and acculturation with local culture, sacred characteristics of Buddhist architecture became mixed and difficult to distinguish. This research aims to study the influence of Mahayana and Vajrayana schools on the sacred characteristics of Theravada Buddhist architecture in Indonesia. Elaboration of Buddhist architecture and sacredness theory are used to analyse case study in surrounding environment, figure, mass structure, spatial planning, and ornamentation scope to obtain comprehensive acculturation picture of Mahayana and Vajrayana philosophy on Theravada vihara in Indonesia. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the circular shape that was characteristic of the early Theravada school in the architectural form of the monastery began to be abandoned and the use of anthropomorphic Buddha and iconic symbols as ornamentation elements which were only known in the development of Mahayana and Vajrayana schools.
References
Barrie, T. (2013). The Sacred In-Between: The Mediating Roles of Architecture. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881119
Buaban, J. (2021). Thai Monks Adaptability in Indonesian Chinese Community. Journal of Social Sciences Mahamakut Buddhist University, 4(1), 24–38.
Busro, B. (2017). Agama Buddha di Indonesia: Sejarah, Kemunduran dan Kebangkitan. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Cahyawan, M. C., & Saliya, Y. (2017). Similarities and Differences in the Spatial Pattern and Form of Buddhist Buildings of Worship on Bali. Riset Arsitektur (RISA), 1(04), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.26593/risa.v1i04.2758.413-426
Coleman, J. W. (1999). The new Buddhism: Some empirical findings. In D. R. Williams & C. S. Queen (Eds.), American Buddhism: Methods and findings in recent scholarship (pp. 91–99). Richmond: Curzon.
Dhammadhiro. (2012). Buddharupa: Bagaimana Buddhis Menyikapi Obyek Pujaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Sammasayambhu.
Durkheim, E. (1915). The Elementary Forms Of The Religious Life. New York and London: The Free Press.
Eliade, M. (1959). The Sacred and the Profane. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Emmett, C. F. (2000). Sharing sacred space in the Holy Land. In A. B. Murphy & D. L. Johnson (Eds.), Cultural encounters with the environment: Enduring and evolving geographic themes (pp. 261–282). New York: Roman and Littlefield Lanham, MD.
Hamilton, S., & Spicer, A. (2005). Defining the holy: the delineation of sacred space. In A. Spicer & S. Hamilton (Eds.), Defining the holy: Sacred space in medieval and Early Modern Europe (pp. 1–23). Hants: Ashgate Aldershot.
Herwindo, R. P. (2011). Representasi Candi dalam Dinamika Arsitektur Era Pasca Kolonial di Indonesia. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.
Herwindo, R. P., & Kedmon, E. (2009). Penggalian Potensi Desain Candi dan Aplikasinya dalam Arsitektur pasca Hindu Buddha di Jawa. Universitas Katholik Parahyangan.
Hoffmann, D. R. (2010). Seeking the Sacred in Contemporary Religious Architecture. Kent: The Kent State University Press.
Hunt, S. (2007). Sacred. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss002
Hunter, T. (2017). Esoteric Buddhism in Medieval Maritime Asia: Networks of Masters, Texts, Icons, edited by Andrea A. Acri. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 173(4), 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17304007
Jones, L. (1993). The Hermeneutics of Sacred Architecture: A Reassessment of the Similitude between Tula, Hidalgo and Chichen Itza, Yucatan, Part II. History of Religions, 32(4), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1086/463345
Khanjanusthiti, P. (2004). Philosophical Approach to Conservation of Buddhist Monastery in Thailand. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, 7(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-00701004
Newell, C. (2010). Approaches to the Study of Buddhism. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Religion. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320787
Nöth, W. (2020). Handbook of Semiotics. In Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv14npk46
Phuoc, L. H. (2012). Buddhist Architecture. Lakeville: Graphic.
Sarwade, W. K. (2015). A Study of History of Buddhism and its Contribution to Indian Culture. Journal of International Buddhist Studies, 6(1), 35–44.
Singgih. (2021). Penerapan Konsep Sakralitas Buddha Theravada pada Pengembangan Perancangan Arsitektur Vihara dan Museum di Vihara Jakarta Dhammacakka Jaya. Universitas Katholik Parahyangan.
Syukur, A. (2022). Theological debate among Buddhist sects in Indonesia. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(4), 8.
Thirathamrongwee, P., & Mongkolpradit, W. (2021). A Study of the Principles of Three Major Sects for Creating Buddhist Sacred Places. Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 20(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202120118
Varley, H. (2011). The Buddha and His Teachings. Leicester: Anness Publishing.
Wang, B. (2021). Buddhist Thought and the Adaptive Development of Contemporary Chinese Dream. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(5), 49–57.
Wijaya, W. Y. (2008). Pandangan Benar. Yogyakarta: Vidyasena Production.
Yayasan Vihara Jakarta Dhammacakka Jaya. (2019). Kebangkitan Agama Buddha di Indonesia dan Sejarah Pembangunan Vihara Jakarta Dhammacakka Jaya. Jakarta: Yayasan Vihara Jakarta Dhammacakka Jaya.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).