Prejudice and Religious Conflict : Dispositive Analysis of Film “Nama Saya Ahmadâ€
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kt.v4i1.18169Keywords:
Prejudice, Religious Conflict, Dialogue, Social IntegrationAbstract
So far, studies on the sources of conflict are more dominantly viewed from a macro-social perspective without considering a micro-social perspective. Socio-cultural disparities, political dominance, inequality in economic distribution, and differences in religious or ethnic identity are more dominantly understood as causes of conflict. Whereas the potential for animal power that is inherent in humans is also a factor in the occurrence of conflict. Applying the method of dispositive analysis modeled by S. Jager and F. Maier, this text-based article aims to complete the lack of interpretation of the source of the conflict and analyze how the text of the film “Nama Saya Ahmad†represents the correlation of prejudice and religious conflict. This article shows that the film “Nama Saya Ahmad†depicts religious conflicts starting from prejudice between religious believers. In order for prejudice to be parsed, it is important to expand the dialogue space. Apart from breaking down prejudices, dialogue can also strengthen the social integration of the community.
References
Abdel-Fadil, M. (2019). The politics of affect: The glue of religious and identity conflicts in social media. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 8(1), 11–34.
Affandi, H. I. (2004). Akar konflik sepanjang zaman: elaborasi pemikiran Ibn Khaldun. Bandung: Pustaka Pelajar.
Alfandi, M. (2013). Prasangka: Potensi Pemicu Konflik Internal Umat Islam. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 21(1), 113–140.
Basedau, M., & Schaefer-Kehnert, J. (2019). Religious Discrimination and Religious Armed Conflict in sub-Saharan Africa: an Obvious Relationship? Religion, State and Society, 47(1), 30–47.
Bertrand, J. (2004). Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bromwich, B. (2018). Power, contested institutions and land: repoliticising analysis of natural resources and conflict in Darfur. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2017.1403782
Burhanuddin, N., Nurdin, A. A., & Helmy, M. I. (2019). Religious Conflict and Regional Autonomy in Church Establishment and Islamic Clothing in West Pasaman and Dharmasraya West Sumatera. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 9(2), 189–216.
Campbell, J. (1999). Nationalism, Ethnicity and Religion: Fundamental Conflicts and the Politics of Identity in Tanzania. Nations and Nationalism, 5(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-5078.1999.00105.x
Eck, K. (2014). The law of the land. Journal of Peace Research, 51(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314522257
Harish, S. P. (2006). Ethnic or religious cleavage? Investigating the nature of the conflict in Southern Thailand. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 28(1), 48–69.
Haryatmoko. (2019). Critical Discourse Analysis (Analisis Wacana Kritis): Landasan Teori, Metodologi dan Penerapan. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Heryanto, H. (2021). Kesadaran Beragama dalam Perspektif Ihsan: Pengalaman Pertaubatan Preman. Khazanah Theologia, 3(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.15575/kt.v3i2.10974
Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoritical and Mehodological Aspects of Foucauldian CDA and Dispositive Analysis. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 34–61). London: Sage.
Kanas, A., & Martinovic, B. (2017). Political Action in Conflict and Nonconflict Regions in Indonesia: The Role of Religious and National Identifications. Political Psychology, 38(2), 209–225.
Klinken, G. van. (2001). The Maluku Wars: Bringing Society Back In. Indonesia, 71(1), 1–26.
Kunovich, R. M., & Hodson, R. (1999). Conflict, Religious Identity, and Ethnic Intolerance in Croatia. Social Forces, 78(2), 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/78.2.643
Lestari, G. (2021). Radikalisme Atas Nama Agama dalam Perspektif Intelektual Muda di Tengah Realitas Multikultural. Khazanah Theologia, 3(3), 181–193.
Liliweri, A. (2018). Prasangka, Konflik, dan Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Jakarta: Kencana.
Maoz, Z., & Henderson, E. A. (2020). Scriptures, Shrines, Scapegoats, and World Politics: Religious Sources of Conflict and Cooperation in the Modern Era. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Philips, G. (2016). Melampaui Pluralisme: Integritas Terbuka sebagai Pendekatan yang Sesuai bagi Dialog Muslim-Kristen. Malang: Madani.
Wach, J. (1958). The Comparative Study of Religions (J. M. Kitagawa, ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Wahyuni, D. (2017). Agama Sebagai Media dan Media Sebagai Agama. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama, 18(2).
Wahyuni, D. (2019). Gerakan Dialog Keagamaan: Ruang Perjumpaan Antar Umat Beragama di Kota Bandung. Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Lintas Budaya, 3(2), 188–197.
Wahyuni, D., Yurnarlis, S. A. F. H., & Idris, M. (2021). Filsafat Perenial dan Dialog Agama: Studi Pemikiran Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Jurnal Al-Aqidah, 13(1), 103–116.
Wilson, C. (2008). Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia: From Soil to God. Abingdon: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).