Cybertheology and the Ethical Dimensions of Artificial Superintelligence: A Theological Inquiry into Existential Risks

Authors

  • Ted Peters Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/kt.v6i1.33559

Keywords:

Artificial Superintelligence, Cybertheology, Ethical Implications, Existential Risk.

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the role of cybertheology in addressing the ethical and societal challenges posed by Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), which has the potential to surpass human cognitive capabilities, heralding a profound cultural and existential crisis. It integrates theological anthropology to assess the implications of a posthuman future. Methodology: Utilising a comprehensive literature review, the research examines technological, philosophical, and theological perspectives through primary and secondary sources, including influential works by futurists and ethicists. The methodology aims to uncover the nuanced discourse surrounding the development of ASI and its potential impacts. Findings: The analysis reveals a narrative marked by speculative optimism and significant existential concerns regarding ASI. A critical gap in the existing ethical discourse is identified, highlighting the necessity for a grounded ethical framework that addresses the profound implications of superintelligent entities on human dignity and societal norms. Research Implications: The findings emphasise the urgent need to incorporate robust ethical considerations into the development and deployment of ASI. Cybertheology is presented as a vital framework for ensuring that ASI technologies align with human values and theological insights, thus providing a valuable lens through which to view the integration of superintelligence into society. Originality/Value: This paper contributes to academic and policy discussions on ASI by promoting cybertheology as a crucial perspective in ethical deliberations. It enriches scholarly dialogues by linking technological advancements with theological and ethical evaluations, proposing that cybertheology can play a pivotal role in shaping policies that govern ASI technologies. This approach ensures that technological progress is compatible with humanistic values, fostering a holistic understanding of ASI's potential impact on humanity.

References

Bartneck, C. C. (2021). An Introduction to Ethics in Robotics and AI (1st ed.). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51110-4

Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Bucknall, B. S., & Dori-Hacohen, S. (2022). Current and Near-Term AI as a Potential Existential Risk Factor. Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 119–129. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534146

Center for Safety. (2023). Statement on AI risk. Retrieved 12 February 2024, from Center for Safety website: https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk

Chace, C. (2015). Surviving AI: The promise and peril of artificial intelligence. Three Cs.

Chow, A. A. (2024). The AI arms race is changing everything. Time Special Edition on Artificial Intelligence: A New Age of Possibilities, 8–13.

Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

D’Aquili, E. G., & Newberg, A. B. (1996). Consciousness and the Machine. Zygon®, 31(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1996.tb00021.x

Farley, M. (1993). A feminist version of respect for persons. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 9(1–2), 193–198.

Florea, D., & Gilder, E. (2024). Pushing the Limits of Theosis in the Digital Age: Exploring AI Complexities and their Impact on Romanian Traditional Religious Practices. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 23(68), 73–87.

Gaudet, M., Herzfeld, N., Scherz, P., & Wales, A. J. (2024). Encountering artificial intelligence: Ethical and anthropological investigations. Eugene, OR: Pickwick.

Gold, J. C. (2012). Does the buddha have a theory of mind? Animal cognition and human distinctiveness in Buddhism. In The Routledge Companion to Religion and Science (pp. 520–528). London: Taylor and Francis.

JedliÄková, A. (2024). Ethical considerations in Risk management of autonomous and intelligent systems. Ethics & Bioethics, 14(1–2), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2024-0007

Kant, I. (1948). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (H. J. Paton, Trans.). New York: Harper.

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Penguin. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137349088_26

Kurzweil, R. (2024). The singularity is nearer. New York: Viking.

Larson, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence: Why computers can think like we do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674259935

Peters, T. (2017). Where there’s life there’s intelligence. In A. Losch (Ed.), What is life? On Earth and beyond (pp. 236–259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316809648.014

Peters, T. (2018). Playing God with Frankenstein. Theology and Science, 16(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2018.1455264

Reibel, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence. Seattle: Amazon Digital Services LLC.

Shita, M. (2023). The science of intelligence. Global Economic Alliance.

Spadaro, A. (2014). Cybertheology: Thinking Christianity in the era of the Internet. New York: Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823256990.001.0001

Tillich, P. (1951). Systematic Theology (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Trothen, T. J., Kwok, P. L., & Lee, B. (2024). AI and East Asian Philosophical and Religious Traditions: Relationality and Fluidity. Religions, 15(5), 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050593

Umbrello, S. (2023). The Intersection of Bernard Lonergan’s Critical Realism, the Common Good, and Artificial Intelligence in Modern Religious Practices. Religions, 14(12), 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14121536

Zaluchu, S. E. (2024). Digital Religion, Modern Society and the Construction of Digital Theology. Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/02653788231223929

Downloads

Published

2024-08-07

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Khazanah Theologia

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).