Uniting Through Humour: Navigating Interreligious Dialogue in Indonesia's Cyberspace During Elections

Authors

  • Yuri Nabila Saifatunnisa Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ulfah Wafa Almubarokah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Raihan Aqhsal Arighi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Salman Abidin Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1213-5565

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/kt.v6i1.33811

Keywords:

Garis Lucu, Indonesia, Religion Online ‎

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the role of humour in fostering interreligious dialogue and cooperation within Indonesia’s digital spaces, particularly during the politically charged atmosphere of the 2024 general election. Methodology: Employing netnography, this research focuses on the 'Garis Lucu' (GL) cyberculture, analysing interactions on platforms like Twitter and Instagram to understand how humour mediates religious and political discourse. Findings: The study identifies three main themes: political engagement, political communication, and religious humour. Humour was found to significantly enhance civic engagement and function as a bridge in interreligious communication, easing tensions and fostering a culture of mutual respect and understanding. Research Implications: The findings suggest that digital platforms can serve as effective forums for promoting societal harmony and tolerance through humour, particularly in diverse societies facing political and religious tensions. Originality/Value: This research contributes to the understanding of cyberculture and interreligious dialogue by illustrating how humour can transform potentially divisive political interactions into opportunities for constructive and harmonious exchanges.

References

Al-Ayya, A. (2022). Narasi Toleransi Beragama Di Media Sosial. Proceeding Of The 1st International Conference Cultures & Languages, 3(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.22515/mjmib.v3i1.5581

Alfian, A., & Halim, W. (2022). Countering Social Stigma as the Basis of Interfaith Movement: A Case Study of Cadar Garis Lucu. Dialog, 45(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v45i2.655

Aminuddin, L. H. (2020). Islam Nusantara and Progressive Islam: Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) And Muhammadiyah’s View on Relationship of Religion and Culture. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.48080/jae.v17i3.124

Azizah, N., Nkwede, J. O., & Armoyu, M. (2021). The octopus-like power of Pesantren dynasty in the dynamics of local politics. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), 1962056. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1962056

Barber, M. (2017). Religion and Humor as Emancipating Provinces of Meaning. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62190-6

Berne, E. (1972). What Do You Say After You Say Hello? The Psychology of Human Destiny. New York: Grove Press.

Bräuchler, B. (2003). Cyberidentities at War: Religion, Identity, and the Internet in the Moluccan Conflict. Indonesia, (75), 123–151.

Brubaker, R. (2015). Religious Dimensions of Political Conflict and Violence. Sociological Theory, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275115572153

Campbell, H. A. (2007). Who’s Got the Power? Religious Authority and the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 1043–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00362.x

Campbell, H. A., Arredondo, K., Dundas, K., & Wolf, C. (2018). The Dissonance of “Civil†Religion in Religious-Political Memetic Discourse During the 2016 Presidential Elections. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 205630511878267. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118782678

Cavanaugh, W. T. (2011). The Myth of Religious Violence. In A. R. Murphy (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Religion and Violence (pp. 23–33). West Sussex: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395747.ch2

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: SAGE Publications Inc.

Dalle, M. (2023). Deklarasi Anies - Muhaimin dan Konflik Ideologi NU Versus PKS di Pentas Politik Nasional. JRP (Jurnal Review Politik), 13(2), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrp.2023.13.2.52-74

Davis, J. L., Love, T. P., & Killen, G. (2018). Seriously funny: The political work of humor on social media. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3898–3916. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818762602

Dwifatma, A., & Beta, A. R. (2024). The “Funny Line Veil†and the mediated political subjectivity of Muslim women in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2024.2320900

Frederiks, M. T. (2012). The Women’s Interfaith Journey: Journeying as a Method in Interfaith Relations. Missiology: An International Review, 40(4), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/009182961204000407

Geertz, C. (1960). The Javanese Kijaji: the Changing Role of a Cultural Broker. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 2(2), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500000670

Ghozali, I. (2022a). Political Civilization Links of Cross-Religious Social Media Activities on Twitter. Proceedings: Dirundeng International Conference on Islamic Studies, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.47498/dicis.v1i1.1010

Ghozali, I. (2022b). The Criticism of the Political Model of Humanity’s Twitter NU Garis Lucu Against Intolerant Groups and Government. Islam Realitas: Journal of Islamic and Social Studies, 8(1), 01. https://doi.org/10.30983/islam_realitas.v8i1.5250

Giangravé, C. (2022). Pope Francis disrupts tradition while drawing firm lines in new cardinal picks. Retrieved 12 January 2024, from Religion News website: https://religionnews.com/2022/06/13/pope-francis-disrupts-tradition-while-drawing-firm-lines-in-new-cardinal-picks/

Gilhus, I. S. (2013). Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins: Laughter in the History of Religion. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203411605

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 1; T. McCharthy, Trans.). Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Beacon Press.

Horsley, R. A. (1980). Gnosis in Corinth: I Corinthians 8. 1–6. New Testament Studies, 27(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500010249

Kerr, D., & Hoskins, B. (2023). The evidence on educational methods for political engagement. In Who’s Afraid of Political Education? (pp. 147–162). Bristol: Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2711500.14

Kolozaridi, P. (2019). Actors to Be Distinguished: The Case of NGOs as Stakeholders of Russian Internet. 5th International Conference on Internet Science, INSCI, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_22

Kozinets, R. V., & Gretzel, U. (2024). Netnography evolved: New contexts, scope, procedures and sensibilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 104, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103693

Kriger, M., & Seng, Y. (2005). Leadership with inner meaning: A contingency theory of leadership based on the worldviews of five religions. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 771–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.07.007

Ktoridou, D., Epaminonda, E., & Charalambous, A. (2018). Social Media in Election Campaigns: The Case of the 2013 Presidential Elections in Cyprus. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 37(2), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2018.2826063

Kurtzberg, T. R., Naquin, C. E., & Belkin, L. Y. (2009). Humor as a relationshipâ€building tool in online negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20(4), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060910991075

Lundberg, E. (2024). Can Participation in Mock Elections Boost Civic Competence among Students? Journal of Political Science Education, 20(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2023.2300425

Mahadewi, L., Surachman, S., Hadiwidjojo, D., & Indrawati, N. K. (2022). Contextualization of Religion and Entrepreneurial Performance: A Lens of Buddhist Small Business Entrepreneurs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846082

Marta, E., Marzana, D., Aresi, G., & Pozzi, M. (2016). When Living and Working Well Together in Organizations Changes Into Good Social Coexistence: The Talent Club Case. World Futures, 72(5–6), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2016.1256078

McKee, H. (2002). ‘Your views showed true ingnorance!!!’: (Mis)Communication in an online interracial discussion forum. Computers and Composition, 19(4), 411–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(02)00143-3

Moalla, A. (2015). Intercultural strategies to coâ€construct and interpret humor. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12074

Muhtadi, B., & Muslim, K. (2023). The Prabowo-Gibran Pairing: Wise or Foolish? ISEAS-Perspective, (95), 1–12.

Munson, C., & Chetkow-Yanoov, B. H. (1999). Celebrating Diversity: Coexisting in a Multicultural Society. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315809755

Nechansky, H. (2016). The four modes of coexistence in psychology and group dynamics. Kybernetes, 45(3), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2014-0193

Norris, P. (2015). Political Communication. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 342–349). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.95025-6

Obadare, E. (2009). The Uses of Ridicule: Humour, ‘Infrapolitics’ and Civil Society in Nigeria. African Affairs, 108(431), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adn086

Okun, S., & Nimrod, G. (2017). Online ultra-orthodox religious communities as a third space: A netnographic study. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2825 – 2841.

Palsson, G. (2014). Personal Names: Embodiment, Differentiation, Exclusion, and Belonging. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(4), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913516808

Rohmatulloh, D. (2019). In Meme Dakwah: A Netnographic Study of Garis Lucu Social Media Accounts. The 19th Annual International Conference on Islamic Studies (AICIS 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3991863

Romadhon, S., & Saputra, A. W. (2021). Humor Sebagai Strategi Moderasi Umat Beragama Pascateror Bom Makasar 2021. Tatar Pasundan: Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, 15(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.38075/tp.v15i2.231

Ross, K., & Bürger, T. (2014). Face to face(book): Social media, political campaigning and the unbearable lightness of being there. Political Science, 66(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318714534106

Sadovykh, V., & Sundaram, D. (2017). A longitudinal iterative convergent approach to netnography. AMCIS 2017 - America’s Conference on Information Systems: A Tradition of Innovation, 2017-Augus.

Sevim, E. (2016). Path to the Universal Self in Haji Baktash Walî: Four Doors - Forty Stations. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.12738/spc.2016.2.0014

Stahl, B. C. (2004). Whose Discourse? A Comparison of the Foucauldian and Habermasian Concepts of Discourse in Critical IS Research. 10th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2004, 4329–4336.

Strahovnik, V. (2022). Holism of Religious Beliefs as a Facet of Intercultural Theology and a Challenge for Interreligious Dialogue. Religions, 13(7), 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13070633

Taufiq, F., & Alkholid, A. M. (2022). Religious Tolerance, Social Media and Social-Politics in Indonesia: Exploring of NU Garis Lucu and Catholic Garis Lucu Community. International Conference on Cultures & Languages (ICCL), 1(1 SE-Articles), 159–173.

Theobald, S. (2009). Faith, interfaith, and YouTube: dialogue, or derision? Literature & Aesthetics& Aesthetics, 19(2).

Tripathi, R. C., & Ghildyal, P. (2013). Selfhood in Search of Godhood. Psychology and Developing Societies, 25(1), 43–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333613477319

Tsuria, R. (2013). The video Three Things About Islam: Islamophobia online or a religious dialogue? Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, 25, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.67442

Tsuria, R. (2020). The space between us: considering online media for interreligious dialogue. Religion, 50(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2020.1754598

Vaid, J., Hull, R., Heredia, R., Gerkens, D., & Martinez, F. (2003). Getting a joke: the time course of meaning activation in verbal humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1431–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00184-4

Downloads

Published

2024-08-07

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Khazanah Theologia

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).