Religious Human Resources Management: Perichoresis to manage or to be managed?


Halim Wiryadinata(1*)

(1) Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Pelita Bangsa, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The meaning of the Greek word, which is Perichoresis as co – indwelling or co – inherence in the sight of the Trinity as the dogma of Christian has a broader perspective of mutual interpenetration of Beings. Thus, it leads the author to argue that Perichoresis is terminus technicus in assessing the management of people (Human Resources Management and People Development) to synergize the jobs for maintaining and achieving the goal of the company. Thus, there are three mainstreams of this article, which are: Firstly, I will look at the history of Perichoresis as a terminus technicus; Secondly, I will explore Human Resources Management and People Development as the parallel of Perichoresis; and Lastly, I will construct a concept of Perichoresis as terminus technicus in Human Resources Management and People Development to achieve the vision of the company. 


Keywords


Perichoresis; HRM; Management; Religious

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. M. Francesco, & Gold, B. A. (2005). International Organizational Behavior (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Agamben, G. (2011). The Kingdom and The Glory (1st ed.). California: Stanford University Press.

Artemi, E. (2017). The Term Perichoresis from Cappadocian Fathers to Maximus Confessor [ 1 ] 2 . Trinitarian Context of the Perichoresis from Cappadocian Fathers to Maximus Confessor. International Journal of European Studies, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijes.20170101.14

Biela, A. (2006). A Paradigm of the Unity in Social Sciences. Journal for Perspective of Economic, Political and Social Integration, 17, 167–177.

Bruni, L. (2002). The Economy of Communion: Toward a multidimensional economic culture (spirituality of unity) (L. Bruni, Ed.). New York: New City Press.

Claus, L. (2019). HR disruption—Time already to reinvent talent management. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(3), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2019.04.002

Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundation of Social Research. New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.

Crump, D. (2006). Re-examining the Johannine Trinity: Perichoresis or deification? Scottish Journal of Theology, 59(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930606002547

Grochmal, Stanislaw. (2016). The Paradigm of Unity in the Science and Culture. Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration, 22(1–2), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/pepsi-2016-0002

Grochmal, Stanisław. (2016). Spirituality of unity in management - Economy of Communion. Cogent Business and Management, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1140618

Meyers, M. C. (2019). The neglected role of talent proactivity: Integrating proactive behavior into talent-management theorizing. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100703

Mullins, L. J. (2016). Management & Organisational Behaviour. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Pitelis, C. (2002). On economics and business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00265

Rahner, K. (1970). The Trinity. New York: Herder and Herder.

Rudnyckyj, D. (2010). Spiritual Economies (1st ed.). USA: Cornwell University Press.

S. C. Schneider, & Barsoux, J. (2003). MAanaging Across Cultures (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sanders, F. (2001). Entangled in the Trinity: Economic and Immanent Trinity in Recent Theology. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 40(3), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/0012-2033.00073

Stamatoviĉ, S. (2016). The meaning of perichoresis. Open Theology, 2(1), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2016-0026




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kt.v2i2.8531

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Halim Wiryadinata

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.