The Ijmali Interpretation Method: Its Urgency, Characteristics, and Challenges in the Modern Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/mjiat.v5i2.52236Keywords:
characteristics of interpretation, general interpretation, ijmali methods, urgency of interpretationAbstract
This article examines the ijmali interpretation method as one of the approaches to understanding the Qur’an that has been practiced since the era of the Prophet Muhammad. Characterized by its concise, straightforward, and accessible presentation, tafsir ijmali reflects the practical dimension of Qur’anic interpretation that can be readily received by the wider community. Its popularity indicates that Qur’anic interpretation does not always have to involve extensive analytical discussions; in many contexts, readers need brief and comprehensible explanations that can be easily understood and implemented in everyday life. This study employs a library research method with a qualitative-descriptive approach. The findings demonstrate that the ijmali method explains Qur’anic verses in a concise and general manner, allowing readers, particularly beginners and the general public, to grasp their essential meanings without encountering complex interpretive discussions. The interpretation generally follows the order of the verses by presenting their overall meaning, distinguishing the Qur’anic text from the explanatory interpretation, and employing language that remains close to the wording and style of the Qur’an. Several advantages characterize this method. It enables readers to quickly understand the principal messages of Qur’anic verses, supports educational and da’wah activities, can be accepted by diverse social groups, provides an effective foundation for introductory Qur’anic understanding, minimizes the influence of Isra’iliyyat narratives, and maintains linguistic proximity to the Qur’anic text. Nevertheless, the method also has limitations. Its concise nature may create opportunities for misunderstanding, provides limited discussion of linguistic and rhetorical dimensions, and may result in an incomplete understanding of the broader guidance contained in the Qur’an. Furthermore, its analytical depth is relatively limited. Consequently, in the contemporary era, the ijmali method tends to receive less attention because its restricted analytical scope is considered insufficient for addressing increasingly complex and multifaceted contemporary issues.
References
Akhdiat, A., & Kholiq, A. (2022). Metode Tafsir Al-Qur’an: Deskripsi atas Metode Tafsir Ijmali [Al-Qur’an Tafsir Method: Description of the Ijmali Tafsir Method]. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 2(4), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v2i4.21315 [In Indonesian]
al-Farmawi, A. al-H. (2002). Metode Tafsir Maudhui dan Cara Penerapannya [The Thematic Exegesis Method and Its Application]. Pustaka Setia.
Al-Zarqani, M. A. (1995). Manahi al- ‘Irfan fi ‘Ulum al-Qur’an. Dar Kitab Arabiy.
Al Bayan, A. (2020). Studi Kritis Terjemah Al Quran Depag RI (Tela’ah Terhadap Ayat-Ayat Mutasayabihat Dan Aqidah Dalam Perspektif NU) [A Critical Study of the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs’ Quranic Translation (An Analysis of Mutashabihat Verses and Creed from the. Jurnal Health Sains, 1(6), 638–655. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v1i6.116 [In Indonesian]
Al Farabi, F. A., Kanzu, M. K., Rohman, A., & Aziz, I. H. (2024). Epistemological Study of Ḥasan Baṣrī’s Qirā’ah: Methodology and its Implications in Qur’anic Interpretation. Journal Of Qur’an And Hadith Studies, 13(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v13i1.39699
As-Shabuniy, M. A. (2003). At-Tibyan Fi Ulum-l-Qur’an. Mecca: Nasyru Ihsan.
Baidan, N. (1988). Metodologi Penafsiran Al-Qur’an [Methodology of Interpretation of the Qur’an].
Baidan, N., & Aziz, E. (2016). Metodologi khusus penelitian tafsir [Specialized methodology for exegesis research]. In Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Baihaki, E. S. (2017). Penerjemahan Al-Qur’an: Proses Penerjemahan al-Qur’an di Indonesia [Translation of the Qur’an: The Process of Translating the Qur’an in Indonesia]. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 25(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v25i1.2339 [In Indonesian]
Coppens, P. (2021). Did Modernity End Polyvalence? Some Observations on Tolerance for Ambiguity in Sunni tafsīr. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 23(1), 36–70. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2021.0450
Faruq, U. Al, Ayunintyas, D. R., Nafilah, N. A., Ilmi, R. U., & Afandi, S. I. (2024). Tarjamah, Tafsir, dan Ta’wil Umar. Jurnal Studi Islam Indonesia (JSII), 2(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.61930/jsii.v2i1.625
Ghozali, M. A. A., & Kalsum, U. (2020). Mempertimbangkan Hermeneutik Gadamer Sebagai Metode Tafsir (Telaah Terhadap Teori Asimilasi Horison) [Considering Gadamer’s Hermeneutics as a Method of Interpretation (An Analysis of the Theory of Horizon Fusion)]. Dialogia, 18(1), 205–206. https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v18i1.2085 [In Indonesian]
Gusmian, I. (2013). Khazanah Tafsir Indonesia; dari Hermeneutika hingga Ideologi [The Indonesian Exegetical Tradition: From Hermeneutics to Ideology]. Lkis Pelangi Aksara.
Haruna, S. L. (2024). Contemporary Approaches to Qur’anic Hermeneutics. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Sains Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsh.v8i2.83869
Husna, N. U. (2024). The Ijmali Tafsir Method: Its History, Importance, Steps, Benefits, and Drawbacks in the Interpretation of the Qur’an. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 4(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v4i1.31657
Ichwan, M. N., & Salisu, A. (2024). Reevaluating Qur’anic Hermeneutics: A Comparative Analysis Between Classical Tafsir and Modern Hermeneutical Approaches. KALAM, 18(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.24042/kalam.v18i2.24213
Khaerussalam, A., & Rokhim, A. (2026). Qawâ’id al-Tafsîr as an Integrative Methodological Framework: Its Relation to Arabic Language and Uṣûl al-Fiqh. ABHATS: Jurnal Islam Ulil Albab, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/abhats.vol7.iss1.art8
Kholisoh. (2025). Kaidah Tafsir Sebagai Panduan Memahami Sumber Dasar Tafsir Al-Qur’an [Principles of Exegesis as a Guide to Understanding the Foundational Sources of Quranic Exegesis]. Raqib: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.56872/e4vc1m50 [In Indonesian]
Kulinich, A. (2022). “Personal Opinion” in Qurʾānic Exegesis : Medieval Debates and Interpretations of al-Tafsīr bi-l-Raʾy. Der Islam, 99(2), 476–513. https://doi.org/10.1515/islam-2022-0024
Ma`arif, B. S., Rahmat, M., Suryana, E., & . T. (2024). Al-Quran Literacy on Religious Moderation: Critical Communicative Action Research in IRE Learning in the Digital Era. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 1408–1426. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3597
Mile, I., & Arif, M. (2022). Metodologi Studi Tafsir [Methodology of Exegetical Studies]. Pekerti: Journal Pendidikan Islam Dan Budi Pekerti, 4(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.58194/pekerti.v4i2.3290 [In Indonesian]
Mustaqim, A. (2010). Epistemologi Tafsir Kontemporer [Epistemology of Contemporary Exegesis]. LKiS.
Mustaqim, A. (2017). Metode Penelitian Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir [Research Methods in Quranic Studies and Exegesis]. Idea Press.
Putra, A. (2018). Metodologi Tafsir [Exegesis Methodology]. Jurnal Ulunnuha, 7(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.15548/ju.v7i1.237 [In Indonesian]
Ridho, H., Sabil, A., Firmansyah, M., Mukhlis, F. H., & Khairi, A. (2025). Interpretation of the Qur’an from Classical-Textual to Contemporary-Contextual; An Approach Proposed by Muslim Scholars. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 4(2), 645–674. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i2.12593
Ridwan, A. R., Maulana, M., Assiddiq, W., Rupiani, P., & Isnaini, Y. (2024). Klasifikasi Tafsir Berdasarkan Metode Ijmali [Classification of Tafsir Based on the Ijmali Method]. Social, Educational, Learning and Language (SELL), 2(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.61930/sell.v2i2.173 [In Indonesian]
Rifa’i, I., Marlina, L., & Fauzi, S. (2023). Ragam Pendekatan dan Metode Penafsiran Al-Qur’an [Various Approaches and Methods of Qur’anic Interpretation]. Rayah Al-Islam, 7(1), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.37274/rais.v7i1.684 [In Indonesian]
Rokim, S. (2017). Mengenal Metode Tafsir Tahlili [Understanding the Tahlili Method of Exegesis]. Al - Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 2(03). https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v2i03.194 [In Indonesian]
Safa, A., Maram, A. N., Wara, J., & Ahmadi, A. (2025). Hasan al-Turabi’s Methodology in al-Tafsīr al-Tawḥīdī: A Contextual and Ideological Approach to Qur’anic Interpretation. QOF, 9(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v9i1.2731
Selian, B. N., & Syabuddin, S. (2025). Metode Ijmali dan Aplikasinya dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Fathir: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.71153/fathir.v2i1.155
Shihab, M. Q. (2013). Kaidah Tafsir [Principles of Exegesis]. Lentera Hati.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif [Qualitative Research Methods]. CV Alfabeta.
Suri, S., & AN, A. N. (2022). Konstruksi Metode Tafsir Ijmali: Kajian Terhadap Kitab At-Tafsir Al-Muyassar Karya ‘Aidh Al-Qarni [Construction of the Ijmali Tafsir Method: A Study of the Book of At-Tafsir Al-Muyassar by ’Aidh Al-Qarni]. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 6(3), 1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4313 [In Indonesian]
Uthamn, Y. O. O.-O. (2023). Qur’anic Revelation: The Comparison between the Methods of Tafsir and Fiqh in its Interpretation. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.22515/islimus.v8i1.3959
Wahidi, R., & Rahman, Y. (2024). Methods And Patterns Of Interpretation And Development Of Tafsir Methodology In Indonesia. Syahadah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Keislaman, 12(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.32520/syahadah.v12i1.4690
Wibowo, H. S. (2021). Ijmali Method in Interpretation Al-Qur’an. Tawasut, 8(01). https://doi.org/10.31942/ta.v8i01.5464
Yakubovych, M. (2022). Qur’an Translations into Central Asian Languages: Exegetical Standards and Translation Processes. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 24(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2022.0491
Yunus, B. M. (2025). Kategorisasi Ilmu Tafsir [Categorization of the Science of Tafsir]. Yayasan Values Institute.
Zulfa, I. (2023). Sahiron Syamsuddin’s Contributions to the Methodological Discourse of Al-Qur’an Interpretation in Indonesia. TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 8(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v8i2.20133
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aldi Rifki Maulana, Ghina Salsabila, Ilafi Weharima Zakiah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).