Implementing Legal Consequences of Forgery of Authentic Deeds Performed by the Notary Profession

Margareth Tutut Maharani Prakoso(1*), Sukirno Sukirno(2)

(1) Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
(2) , Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


Notary is a public official who has the authority to make an authentic deed. In making an authentic deed, it must be based on the applicable laws and regulations so that legal certainty is created. An authentic deed drawn up before a Notary Public must not only comply with statutory regulations, but is desired by interested parties to ensure the rights and obligations of the parties for the sake of certainty, order and legal protection for interested parties. Notary is a position of trust. The position of trust given by law and society requires a Notary to be responsible for carrying out the trust as well as possible and upholding legal ethics and the dignity and position of his position. In the Notary profession, there is also a code of ethics when a Notary carries out his position must be guided by laws and regulations as well as a notary's code of ethics. Regulations related to the position of a notary are regulated in Law Number 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary or commonly referred to as the Law on Notary Position (UUJN). The Notary Office Law regulates things that must be done and prohibited for a person who works as a Notary.

Full Text:



Arrohim, M. B., Sunarno, H. W., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2020). Analysis of Judicial Application of Criminal Penalty Against Notary/Land Deed Officials Conducting Making Crime of the Fake Authentic Deed in State Court of Semarang. Jurnal Akta, 7(2), 443981.

Bashori, M. S. (2016). Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Bagi Notaris yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Jurnal Supremasi, 3-3.

Beqiraj, E., Fedeli, S., & Giuriato, L. (2020). Policy Tolerance of Economic Crime? An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Counterfeiting on Italian Trade. European Journal of Political Economy, 65, 101933.

Budianto, A., Sihombing, J., Krissanti, V. D., Jamin, S., Pramono, R., & Purwanto, A. (2020). Obligation to Prove Appearer Document Authenticity as Deelneming Claim Exception. J. Advanced Res. L. & Econ., 11, 761.

Devi, N. M. L. S., & Westra, I. K. (2021). Akibat Hukum serta Sanksi Pemalsuan yang Dilakukan Notaris kepada Penghadap Ketika Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 6(02), 248-258.

Gusti, P. D. S. A. (2019). Novum Dan Putusan Pengadilan yang Saling Bertentangan sebagai Landasan Dasar Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali Terpidana dalam Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik. Verstek, 7(3).

Lamatenggo, C. G. (2021). Kajian Yuridis Pemalsuan Surat Sederhana (Pasal 263 KUHP) Dalam Kaitannya dengan Pemalsuan Akta Otentik (Pasal 264 Ayat (1) Ke 1 KUHP). Lex Crimen, 10(1).

Monica, P., & Pocora, M. S. (2013). Forgery from the Point of View of Criminal Illicitness, Putative Deeds and Disregarding Fides Publica. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 9(2).

Muhammad, F. N., Widowaty, Y., & Raharjo, T. (2019). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik yang Dilakukan oleh Notaris. Media of Law and Sharia, 1(1), 1-13.

Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2007). Make-Believe Papers, Legal Forms and the Counterfeit: Affective Interactions between Documents and People in Britain and Cyprus. Anthropological Theory, 7(1), 79-98.

Priono, A., Novianto, W. T., & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2017). Penerapan Teori Penafsiran Hukum oleh Hakim sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris (Studi atas Putusan Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik). Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 5(2).

Putri, R. D., & Putra, M. F. M. (2022). Legal Protection against Notaries Due to Interceptors Who Provide False Information in the Minuta of the Deed of Sale and Purchase (Study of High Court Decision Number 99/PID/2020/PT. BDG). LEGAL BRIEF, 11(5), 2953-2960.

Safitri, A. N., Latumeten, P., & Suryandono, W. (2019). Pemalsuan Akta Jual Beli yang Dibuat setelah PPAT Meninggal Dunia (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 620K/PID/2016). Indonesian Notary, 1(001).

Saputro, T. E., Maerani, I. A., & Riyanto, T. F. (2021). Implications of Falsifying Authentic Data in Deed of Sale & Purchase on Certificate of Building Use Rights (SHGB). Sultan Agung Notary Law Review, 3(3), 893-931.

Setyono, A., & Novianto, W. T. (2018). Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik yang Dilakukan oleh Notaris (Analisis Putusan Makamah Agung Nomor 40/Pid. B/2013/Pn. Lsm). Jurnal Repertorium, 5(2).

Siahaan, K. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris sebagai Alat Bukti pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Recital Review, 1(2), 72-88.

Siranggi, I., Husin, S., & Azheri, B. (2019). Liability of Substitute Notary in Deed Correction. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(4), 30-41.

Suhendar, S., Yunus, N. R., & Rezki, A. (2022). Criminalization of Birth Certificate Forgery in Minors' Marriages. Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law, 6(1), 1-10.

Sunaryo, P. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris dalam Pemalsuan Akta Otentik (Studi Tentang Putusan Pidana yang dikuatkan oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: 1014K/Pid/2013) (Doctoral dissertation, UNS (Sebelas Maret University)).

Weisbord, R. K., & Horton, D. (2019). Inheritance Forgery. Duke LJ, 69, 855.

Wibowo, D. S., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2019). The Accountability of the Criminal Case Relating to the Act made by Act No. 2 of 2014. Jurnal Akta, 6(2), 324879.

Wirantia, W., Darmawan, D., & Suhaimi, S. (2020). PPAT'S Legal Responsibility for the Creation of Empty Deed. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 4(3), 351-368.




  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 Margareth Tutut Maharani Prakoso

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi & Pemerintahan Daerah
Has Been Indexed on:

Indeks Harvard    


Ministrate : Jurnal Birokrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International