Transformasi Digital dalam Administrasi Publik dan Dampaknya terhadap Kesadaran Politik Ekonomi: Analisis Pendekatan Kualitatif dalam Connected Community


Tekat Sukomardojo(1*), Ryan Aldiansyah Akbar(2), Zaenal Aripin(3), Fakhry Amin(4), Endang Fatmawati(5)

(1) Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) The Department of Communications, Informatics and Statistics of DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Sangga Buana Bandung, Indonesia
(4) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Enam Enam Kendari, Indonesia
(5) Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Digital transformation affects various conditions and aspects of human life. One of the areas affected is public administration. This research aims to see and explore how digital transformation and public administration and the impact it has on the political and economic awareness of people who have started to be connected by the presence of technology. This research was carried out using a qualitative approach to be able to see how digital transformation in public administration can affect the political economy of society. The results of this study found that there was a significant impact on political economy awareness and the way government works as a whole as a result of digital transformation in public administration. This is because the existence of public transformation can increase efficiency, transparency and participation for the community. In the context of political economy awareness, digital transformation enables wider and inclusive participation from society. Through digital platforms, the public can provide input, express opinions, and participate in relevant discussions.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y. C. (2022). Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101664.

Ali, E. B., Anufriev, V. P., & Amfo, B. (2021). Green economy implementation in Ghana as a road map for a sustainable development drive: A review. Scientific African, 12, e00756.

Alvarenga, A., Matos, F., Godina, R., & CO Matias, J. (2020). Digital transformation and knowledge management in the public sector. Sustainability, 12(14), 5824.

Al-Zahrani, M. (2020). Integrating IS success model with cybersecurity factors for e-government implementation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 10(5), 4937-4955.

Ayuningtyas, D., Haq, H. U., Utami, R. R. M., & Susilia, S. (2021). Requestioning the Indonesia government's public policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic: black box analysis for the period of January–July 2020. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 612994.

Bisht, D., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S. V., Singh, A., Montero, E. C., ... & Twala, B. (2022). Imperative Role of Integrating Digitalization in the Firms Finance: A Technological Perspective. Electronics, 11(19), 3252.

Flechsig, C., Anslinger, F., & Lasch, R. (2022). Robotic Process Automation in purchasing and supply management: A multiple case study on potentials, barriers, and implementation. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 28(1), 100718.

Hess, D. J. (2019). Cooler coalitions for a warmer planet: A review of political strategies for accelerating energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 57, 101246.

Jamil, S. (2021). From digital divide to digital inclusion: Challenges for wide-ranging digitalization in Pakistan. Telecommunications Policy, 45(8), 102206.

Klein, V. B., & Todesco, J. L. (2021). COVID‐19 crisis and SMEs responses: The role of digital transformation. Knowledge and Process Management, 28(2), 117-133.

Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications policy, 44(6), 101976.

Lahsen, M., & Ribot, J. (2022). Politics of attributing extreme events and disasters to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 13(1), e750.

Leckel, A., Veilleux, S., & Dana, L. P. (2020). Local Open Innovation: A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119891.

Machado, C. G., Winroth, M., Almström, P., Ericson Öberg, A., Kurdve, M., & AlMashalah, S. (2021). Digital organisational readiness: experiences from manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(9), 167-182.

Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2020). The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119751.

Mattioli, G., Roberts, C., Steinberger, J. K., & Brown, A. (2020). The political economy of car dependence: A systems of provision approach. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101486.

Myeong, S., & Jung, Y. (2019). Administrative reforms in the fourth industrial revolution: the case of blockchain use. Sustainability, 11(14), 3971.

O’Donovan, N. (2020). From knowledge economy to automation anxiety: a growth regime in crisis?. New political economy, 25(2), 248-266.

Priyono, A., Moin, A., & Putri, V. N. A. O. (2020). Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 104.

Rahadi, D. R., & Wardiman, C. (2022). Strategi Pemasaran Umkm di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Eklektik: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 96-106.

Roblek, V., Meško, M., Pušavec, F., & Likar, B. (2021). The role and meaning of the digital transformation as a disruptive innovation on small and medium manufacturing enterprises. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 592528.

Sajari, A., Haron, H., Ganesan, Y., & Khalid, A. A. (2023). Factors influencing the level of ethics and integrity in Malaysian public sector. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(1), 141-158.

Scupola, A., & Mergel, I. (2022). Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation: The case of Denmark. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101650.

Simonofski, A., Fink, J., & Burnay, C. (2021). Supporting policy-making with social media and e-participation platforms data: A policy analytics framework. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101590.

Valle-Cruz, D., Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A. (2020). Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: From agenda-setting to policy evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101509.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v5i2.26901

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v5i2.26901.g9147

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Tekat Sukomardojo, Ryan Aldiansyah Akbar, Zaenal Aripin, Fakhry Amin, Endang Fatmawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi & Pemerintahan Daerah
Has Been Indexed on:

Indeks Harvard    
    
      

 


Ministrate : Jurnal Birokrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International