Initiating the Implementation of Meaningful Public Participation in Forming Regulations in Urban Areas: From the Perspective of Smart Urban Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v5i3.29284Abstract
Participation of community or city citizens is an essential and critical component in achieving a city's sustainable development. Forms of participation are becoming more accessible and widespread, taking advantage of advances in technology, information, and communication. It becomes a policy choice for various global cities and cities in Indonesia to bring about more meaningful or substantial participation and collaboration through elements of smart governance in the realm of the concept of smart cities. As a response to Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, Law No. 13 of 2022 strengthened the mandate for public participation to make it more meaningful (meaningful participation) in the formation of laws and regulations, both offline/online and online. This mandate applies to all legislators at the national and local levels. Provinces, autonomous cities, or parts of districts characterized by cities are all examples of urban areas. The purpose of this article is to elaborate on the concept of implementing meaningful public participation in the formation of urban regulations through the lens of smart urban governance. This review employs systematic literature review tools in conjunction with qualitative descriptive analysis to create an in-depth framework of the concept of meaningful public participation in the urban context and the development of smart legislation in urban governance. The legislative process in urban areas, both offline and online, can be integrated in one digital ecosystem through the Smart-Legislation platform, facilitating and facilitating community or city residents to participate and engage in the entire process of forming legislation at the city levelReferences
Alikord, M., & Molaee-aghaee, E. (2021). Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic Crisis and Food Safety System: A Literature Review. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 21(6), 18206–18222. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.101.20795
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Arnstein, SA. (1969). Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(216–24.).
Arsil, F., Ayuni, Q., & Mauleny, A. T. (2022). The disappearance of the ‘legislative model’: Indonesian parliament’s experience in response to Covid-19. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2022.2067948
Arsil, F., & Mauleny, A. T. (2020). Public Participation and Implementation of the Representative Function of the Indonesian Parliament during the Enforcement of the Covid-19 Pandemic Emergency.
Arundel, R., & Ronald, R. (2017). The role of urban form in sustainability of community: The case of Amsterdam. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 44(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515608640
Bouregh, A. S. (2022). A Conceptual Framework of Public Participation Utilization for Sustainable Urban Planning in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811470
Bridget, O., Adegboye, O., Quadri, H., Kolawole, C., & Street, S. (2020). Who gets to learn in a pandemic? Exploring the digital divide in remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research Open, December, 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100022
Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66(SUPPL. 1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00668.x
Dalaibuyan, B. (2022). Negotiating the coexistence of mining and pastoralism in Mongolia. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 11(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2021.2021356
Drapalova, E., & Wegrich, K. (2020). Who governs 4.0? Varieties of smart cities. Public Management Review, 22(5), 668–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1718191
Fahmi, F. Z., Prawira, M. I., Hudalah, D., & Firman, T. (2016). Leadership and collaborative planning: The case of Surakarta, Indonesia. Planning Theory, 15(3), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215584655
Firdaus, F. R. (2022). Public Participation after the Law- Making Procedure Law of 2022. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 16(3), 495. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2022.V16.495-514
Foth, M. (2018). Smart and Sustainable Built Environment Participatory urban informatics: Towards citizen- ability. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 7(1), 4–19.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Reviiew, 66, 66–75.
Glass, J. J. (1979). Citizen participation in planning: The relationship between objectives and techniques. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908976956
Gray, S. (2022). The domestic compliance system and compliance barriers: A UK child rights case study. Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2022.2034776
Hemani, S., & Das, A. K. (2016). Humanising urban development in India: Call for a more comprehensive approach to social sustainability in the urban policy and design context. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 8(2), 144–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2015.1074580
Henderson-Dekort, E., Van Bakel, H., & Smits, V. (2022). Gathering Perspectives on Expert Approaches to the Capacity and Rights of Children: Working to Inform a Capacity Assessment Tool for Children to Participate in Family Law Proceedings. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 63(1), 35–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2021.1993010
Herrmann-Lunecke, M. G., Mora, R., & Sagaris, L. (2020). Persistence of walking in Chile: Lessons for urban sustainability. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1712494
Hudalah, D., Firman, T., & Woltjer, J. (2014). Cultural Cooperation, Institution Building and Metropolitan Governance in Decentralizing Indonesia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2217–2234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12096
Indrayana, D., Barokah, M. R., Ph, W. Z., Elven, T. M. A., & Siregar, A. R. (2021). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja: Konsekuensi dan Antisipasinya (Issue November). INTEGRITY.
Irawan, D. (2017). Collaborative Governance (Studi Deskriptif Proses Pemerintahan Kolaboratif Dalam Pengendalian Pencemaran Udara di Kota Surabaya). Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 5(3), 1–12.
Irawan, M. Z., Rizki, M., Joewono, T. B., & Belgiawan, P. F. (2020). Exploring the intention of out-of-home activities participation during new normal conditions in Indonesian cities. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 8(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100237
Islar, M., & Irgil, E. (2018). Grassroots practices of citizenship and politicization in the urban: The case of right to the city initiatives in Barcelona. Citizenship Studies, 22(5), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1477919
Kapelner, Z. (2020). Vulnerable minorities and democratic legitimacy in refugee admission. Ethics and Global Politics, 13(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2020.1735016
Larsson, O. L. (2021). Meta-governance and the segregated city: Difficulties with realizing the participatory ethos in network governance – evidence from Malmö City, Sweden. Policy Studies, 42(4), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1634188
Lennon, M. (2021). Planning and the Post-Pandemic City. Planning Theory and Practice, 00(00), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1960733
McCall-Smith, K. (2021). Entrenching children’s participation through UNCRC Incorporation in Scotland. International Journal of Human Rights, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1969920
Migchelbrink, K., & Van de Walle, S. (2022). A systematic review of the literature on determinants of public managers’ attitudes toward public participation. Local Government Studies, 48(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1885379
Salinan PUTUSAN Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, PUTUSAN Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 1 (2021).
Mouratidis, K. (2021). How COVID-19 reshaped quality of life in cities: A synthesis and implications for urban planning. Land Use Policy, 111(April), 105772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105772
Musavengane, R., & Kloppers, R. (2020). Social capital: An investment towards community resilience in the collaborative natural resources management of community-based tourism schemes. Tourism Management Perspectives, 34(March 2019), 100654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100654
Muzayanah, I. F. U., Nazara, S., Mahi, B. R., & Hartono, D. (2020). Is there social capital in cities? The association of urban form and social capital formation in the metropolitan cities of Indonesia. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 24(4), 532–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1730934
Nurjaman, D. (2021). PENERAPAN ASAS KETERBUKAAN DALAM PROSES PEMBUATAN UNDANG-UNDANG OMNIBUS LAW. Khazanah Multidisiplin, 2(2), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.15575/kl.v2i2.13165
Paulos, E., Honicky, R. J., & Hooker, B. (2009). Citizen Science: Enabling Participatory Urbanism. In M. Foth (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City. IGI Global.
Ranganathan, M., & Balazs, C. (2015). Water marginalization at the urban fringe: Environmental justice and urban political ecology across the North-South divide. Urban Geography, 36(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1005414
Roemer, R. C., & Borchardt, R. (2010). Meaningful Metrics A 21st-Century Librarian’s Guide to Bibliometrics, Altmetrics, and Research Impact Robin. In Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 02, Issue 1975). Association of College and Research Libraries.
Satyal, P., Corbera, E., Dawson, N., Dhungana, H., & Maskey, G. (2019). Representation and participation in formulating Nepal’s REDD+ approach. Climate Policy, 19(sup1), S8–S22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1473752
Shrestha, A., Karki, S., Koju, U., Maraseni, T., Gautam, A. P., Cadman, T., & Baral, S. (2022). Stakeholder perspectives on the effectiveness of governance in red panda conservation programmes in Nepal: A comparative analysis. Ecosystems and People, 18(1), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2121762
Simon, D., Arano, A., Cammisa, M., Perry, B., Pettersson, S., Riise, J., Valencia, S., Oloko, M., Sharma, T., Vora, Y., & Smit, W. (2021). Cities coping with COVID-19: Comparative perspectives. City, 25(1–2), 129–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2021.1894012
Solitare, L. (2005). Prerequisite conditions for meaningful participation in brownfields redevelopment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(6), 917–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500294475
Speer, J. (2012). Participatory Governance Reform: A Good Strategy for Increasing Government Responsiveness and Improving Public Services? World Development, 40(12), 2379–2398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.034
Stovell, G., & Warth, L. (2021). Meaningful participation of older persons and civil society in policymaking Designing A Stakeholders Engagement and Participation Process. In UNECE Population Unit (Issue August).
Supriyadi, E., Dahlan, J. A., & Sugiarni, R. (2016). Analisis Bibliometrik dengan Vosviewer terhadap Perkembangan Penelitian tentang Pemahaman Matematika sebelum Tahun 2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1).
Swapan, M. S. H. (2016). Who participates and who doesn’t? Adapting community participation model for developing countries. Cities, 53, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.013
Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public Participation in Public Decisions New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Tomor, Z., Meijer, A., Michels, A., & Geertman, S. (2019). Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a. Journal of Urban Technology ISSN:, 26(4), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178
Tupan. (2016). Pemetaan bibliometrik dengan vosviewewr terhadap Perkembangan Hasil Penelitian Bidang Pertanian Di Indonesia. Visi Pustaka, 18(3), 217–230.
UN-Habitat. (2022). Envisaging the Future of Cities. In World City Report.
van Buuren, A., van Meerkerk, I., & Tortajada, C. (2019). Understanding emergent participation practices in water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(3), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1585764
Voermans, W., ten Napel, H. M., & Passchier, R. (2015). Combining efficiency and transparency in legislative processes. Theory and Practice of Legislation, 3(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2015.1133398
Widaningrum, A., & Mas’udi, W. (2012). Dinamika Respons Pemerintah Nasional: Krisis Kebijakan Penanganan COVID-19. In W. Mas’udi & P. S. Winanti (Eds.), Tata Kelola Penanganan COVID-19 di Indonesia: Kajian Awal (Vol. 66, pp. 46–63). Gadjah Mada University Press.
Wittig, G. R. (1966). Statistical Bibliography-A Historical Footnote. Journal of Documentation, 22(3), 266–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026404
Zaenuri, M. (2014). Mengelola Pariwisata-Bencana: Perlunya Perubahan Paradigma Pengelolaan Pariwisata Dari Adaptive Governance Menuju Collaborative Governance. UNISIA, XXXVI(81), 157–168.
Zakiyyah, F. N., Winoto, Y., & Rohanda, R. (2022). Pemetaan Bibliometrik terhadap Perkembangan Penelitian dengan Topik Arsitektur Informasi pada Google scholar Menggunakan Vosviewer. Informatio: Journal of Library and Information Science, 2(1), 43–60.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
