Exequatur of Sharia Economic Sector Arbitration Awards in The National Legal System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/am.v10i2.24469Keywords:
Exequatur, Sharia Arbitral Awards, Sharia Economics, ExecutionAbstract
Exequatur is the act of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court granting an executive title to an arbitral award, allowing it to be enforced with the assistance of state instruments if required. This exequatur can take the form of either a stamp affixed to the arbitral award or a separate determination (aparte beschikking). The objective of this research is to identify the judicial bodies that hold the competence to grant exequatur for arbitral awards in Sharia economics and business. The study employs a normative legal approach, concentrating on norms derived from applicable legislations and regulations. Currently, the arbitration settlement cases in the Islamic economics field are handled by two courts. The Sharia exequatur arbitral award is governed by Article 59, paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and ADR. The District Court is authorized to execute this award while the Religious Courts are given the authority to execute and annul Sharia arbitration decisions, according to Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 14 of 2016 regarding Procedures for the Settlement of Sharia Economic Cases. The Arbitration Law and ADR need expeditious revision to incorporate the existence of Sharia arbitration, including the unification of all authority relating to sharia arbitration given to 1 (one) judicial environment, namely the Religious Courts.
Exequatur adalah tindakan Ketua Pengadilan yang memberikan executoriale titel pada putusan arbitrase, yang memungkinkan putusan arbitrase untuk dilaksanakan eksekusi dengan bantuan instrumen negara jika diperlukan. Exequatur ini dapat berupa stempel yang ditempelkan pada putusan arbitrase atau penetapan terpisah (aparte beschikking). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi badan-badan peradilan yang memiliki kompetensi untuk memberikan exequatur untuk putusan arbitrase dalam ekonomi dan bisnis Syariah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif, yang berkonsentrasi pada norma-norma yang berasal dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Saat ini, kasus-kasus penyelesaian arbitrase di bidang ekonomi syariah ditangani oleh dua pengadilan. Exequatur putusan arbitrase syariah diatur dalam Pasal 59 ayat (1) UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan APS. Pengadilan Negeri berwenang untuk mengeksekusi putusan ini, sedangkan Pengadilan Agama diberikan kewenangan untuk mengeksekusi dan membatalkan putusan arbitrase Syariah, sesuai dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah. UU Arbitrase dan APS perlu segera direvisi untuk memasukkan keberadaan arbitrase Syariah, mencakup penyatuan seluruh kewenangan yang berkaitan dengan arbitrase syariah diberikan pada 1 (satu) lingkungan peradilan, yaitu Pengadilan Agama.
References
Batubara, Suleman, dan Orinton Purba. Arbitrase Internasional. Depok: RAIH ASA SUKSES, 2013.
CNN Indonesia. “Daftar Negara yang Terjebak dalam Jurang Resesi.†CNN Indonesia, 18 November 2022. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20221118152523-532-875595/daftar-negara-yang-terjebak-dalam-jurang-resesi.
Efendi, Jonaedi, dan Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.
Girsang, S.U.T. Arbitrase Jilid II. Jakarta: Litbang Diklat Mahkamah Agung RI, 1992.
Hariyanto, Bambang. “Makalah Hukum Acara Arbitrae.†Pendidikan Khusus Profesi Advokat PERADI dan Universitas Pamulang, 31 Maret 2022.
Law Number 3 of 2006 on the Amendment of Law No. 7 of 1989 on Religious Courts
Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Law Number 14 of 1985 on the Supreme Court
Law Number 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power
Mazrieva, Eva, Virginia Gunawan, dan Rivan Dwiastono. “Sri Mulyani: Peringatan bahwa Ekonomi Dunia dalam Bahaya, Bukan Hal Berlebihan.†VOA Indonesia, 14 Oktober 2022. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/sri-mulyani-peringatan-bahwa-ekonomi-dunia-dalam-bahaya-bukan-hal-berlebihan-/6789438.html.
Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Settling Sharia Economic Cases
Tim detikFinance. “Badai PHK Sudah Melanda 18 Perusahaan Besar di Indonesia.†detik.com, 20 November 2022. https://www.detik.com/bali/bisnis/d-6416043/badai-phk-sudah-melanda-18-perusahaan-besar-di-indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).