Efficient Market Analysis of Jakarta Islamic Index (2019-2023)


Rahma Aulia Sidik(1*), Wiku Suryomurti(2), Soon Yong Ang(3)

(1) Institut Agama Islam Tazkia, Indonesia
(2) Institut Agama Islam Tazkia, Indonesia
(3) University of Stirling, United Kingdom
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the efficient market form of the Jakarta Islamic Index. The methodology used is an event study with a window period of 20 days, including ten days before and ten days after the announcement of composition changes held twice a year. The sample consists of 102, with 30 companies listed during the study period and 36 companies excluded and re-listed following the composition change announcements. The analysis technique used is the Paired Sample T-test. The findings reveal no differences in abnormal returns and trading volume activity before and after the announcement. This suggests that the market had already absorbed the announcement information before the event, resulting in a weak reaction and indicating that the announcement did not significantly impact the Jakarta Islamic Index. This implies that the index operates in a semi-strong form of market efficiency. Consequently, companies listed in the index may need additional strategies to improve their stock performance. To provide further insight, this study also examines the average stock trading activity of companies that enter and exit the composition of the Jakarta Islamic Index for the 2019-2023 periods.

Keywords


Abnormal Return; Efficient Market Hypothesis; Jakarta Islamic Index; Islamic Finance; Event Study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrohman, Abdurrohman, Diharpi Herli Setyowati, and Tjetjep Djuwarsa. “Assessment of Sharia Stock Efficiency Using the Sharia-Compliant Asset Pricing Model Approach on the Jakarta Islamic Index.” Journal of Applied Islamic Economics and Finance 1, no. 3 (2021): 641–50. https://doi.org/10.35313/jaief.v1i3.2604.

Afifah, Tiara Early, Neneng Hasanah, and Mohammad Iqbal Irfany. “Testing the Efficient Market Hypothesis with Indonesian Islamic Stocks during the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Annals of Management and Organization Research 4, no. 3 (2023): 175–91. https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v4i3.1621.

Agustin, Isnaini Nuzula. “Testing Weak Form of Stock Market Efficiency at the Indonesia Sharia Stock Index.” Muqtasid: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah 10, no. 1 (2019): 17. https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v10i1.17-29.

Asnawi, Said Kelana, Samuel Pratama, Hans Christian Kurniawan, and Samuel Yosua Rodjana. “Does Indonesian Capital Market Efficient ? : A Relation Between Price-Volume.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis 20, no. 2 (2023): 136–45. https://doi.org/10.31849/jieb.v20i2.13019.

Brown, Stephen J., and Robert A. Haugen. Modern Investment Theory. The Journal of Finance. Vol. 41. Prentice Hall Finance Series : Portfolio Analysis. Prentice Hall International, 1986. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328243.

Dewi, Erina Cahya. “Analysis of the Impact of IDI’s Announcement about 5 Ineffective Covid-19 Drugs on Abnormal Return and Tranding Volume Activity: Event Study on Pharmaceutical Stocks Listed in the 2022 Sharia Securities List.” Institut Agama Islam Tazkia, 2022.

DSN-MUI. “Fatwa DSN-MUI 80/DSN-MUI/III/2011 tentang Penerapan Prinsip Syariah dalam Mekanisme Perdagangan Efek Bersifat Ekuitas di Pasar Reguler Bursa Efek.” Dewan Syariah Nasional - Majelis Ulama Indonesia, March 8, 2011. https://dsnmui.or.id/kategori/fatwa/page/8/.

Faisal, Faisal, M. Shabri Abd Majid, and Lenny Rakhmawati. “Testing Weak Form of Efficient Market Hypothesis before and during COVID-19 Pandemic Periods: Evidence from Indonesia.” 2022 International Conference on Sustainable Islamic Business and Finance, SIBF 2022, no. November (2022): 125–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBF56821.2022.9940133.

Fama, Eugene F. “Stock Market Price Behavior.” The Journal of Finance 25, no. 2 (1970): 383–417.

Indonesia Stock Exchange. “Keterbukaan Informasi.” IDX. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://www.idx.co.id/.

Juliana, Ahmad, Muhammad Tharmizi Junaid, Nia Yuniati, and Aan Digita Malik. “Weak-Form Market Efficiency Study in the Indonesian Capital Market Before and After the COVID-19.” AKUNTABEL: Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan 20, no. 1 (2023): 18–30.

Khajar, Ibnu. “Efficiency of the Sharia Capital Market in Indonesia Before and After the Global Financial Crisis of 2008.” Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan 16, no. 1 (2012): 66–76.

Laela, Sugiyarti Fatma, Dian Yuni Anggraeni, and Rahma Wijayanti. “Financial and Social Performance Impact on Corporate Governance Mediated by Earnings Quality: Evidence from Indonesian Islamic Stocks.” Journal of Islamic Finance 8 (2019): 019–034.

Malini, Helma. “Efficient Market Hypothesis and Market Anomalies of LQ45 Index in Indonesia Stock Exchange.” Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business 3, no. 2 (2019): 107. https://doi.org/10.29259/sijdeb.v3i2.107-121.

Mubarok, Faizul, and Mohammad Masykur Fadhli. “Efficient Market Hypothesis and Forecasting in the Industrial Sector on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.” Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura 23, no. 2 (2020): 160–68. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v23i2.2240.

Mukmin, Mas Nur, and Hermi. “Efficiency of the Sharia Stock Market in Indonesia Based on Announcements of Changes in Stock Composition on the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII).” Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 2015. https://doi.org/10.25105/jmat.v2i1.4943.

Nanda, and Fajri Adrianto. “Abnormal Return Momentum in Sharia Stocks on the Jakarta Islamic Index.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Manajemen 4, no. 4 (2019): Hal 773-785.

Ningrum, Mersa Lestari, and Asep Risman. “Semi-Strong Efficient Market Hypothesis in Dividend Announcements at Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX).” The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics 2, no. 2(33) (2022): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.2(33).2022.23-34.

Nurhasanah. “Efficiency and Integration of Sharia Capital Markets (Empirical Study in Indonesia, Malaysia, Japan, China, Europe, and the United States for the Period 2014-2018).” Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, 2019.

Octavianus, Handi. “Literature Review of the Efficient Market Hypothesis,” no. November (2021): 417. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17253.93925.

Oktavia, Puput. “Analysis of Efficiency in the Sharia Capital Market of Indonesia Before and After Good News, Bad News, and No News Earnings Announcements (Study on Companies Listed on the JII from 2019 to 2021).” Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta, 2022.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. “Statistik Saham Syariah - Desember 2023.” OJK, January 22, 2024. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/saham-syariah/Pages/Statistik-Saham-Syariah---Desember-2023.aspx.

Rodoni, Ahmad, Haikal Djauhari, Yusro Rahma, and Alhussaini Alawad Alhassan. “Comparative Analysis of Efficient Market for Sharia and Conventional Stocks in ASEAN Countries.” Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah 14, no. 1 (2022): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v14i1.25025.

Samudra, Suryadi. “Analysis of Capital Market Efficiency on the Sharia Stock Index at the Indonesia Stock Exchange.” Jurnal Katalogis 4, no. 6 (2016): 134–42.

Samuels, Peter, and Mollie Gilchrist. “Paired Samples T-Test,” no. April (2014).

Setiyawan, Edi, Ari Kristin Prasetyoningrum, and Dessy Noor Farida. “Analysis of the Difference in Abnormal Returns Before and After the Announcement of the Jakarta Islamic Index.” Kompartemen: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi 17, no. 1 (2020): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.30595/kompartemen.v17i1.3980.

Stefhani, Yosi. “Analysis of Sharia Capital Market Efficiency in Indonesia.” Diponegoro Journal of Accounting 2, no. 1 (2017): 2–6.

Suryomurti, Wiku. “Geopolitical Risk and Investor Reaction in Indonesia: Evidence from Russia- Ukraine’s Conflict.” Proceedings of Femfest International Conference on Economics, Management, and Business 1 (2023): 664–74.

Syariati, Alim. “Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility (ICSR) in the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII): Mediation and Moderation Analysis.” Jurnal Iqtisaduna 8, no. 2 (2022): 166–80. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtisaduna.v8i2.33218.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/am.v11i2.35193

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter View My Stats