Constitutional Analysis of Central–Regional Government Authority Relations in Indonesia

Constitutional Analysis of Central–Regional Government Authority Relations in Indonesia

Authors

  • Iskandar Syukur Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v18i2.57485

Keywords:

Authority Relations, Central Government, Regional Government, Regional Autonomy, Fiscal Decentralization

Abstract

The relationship of authority between the central and regional governments remains a constitutional issue in Indonesia due to continuing changes in regional government legislation and persistent conflicts in the implementation of concurrent governmental affairs, particularly in natural resource management, spatial planning, infrastructure development, environmental governance, and business licensing. While post-reform decentralization expanded regional autonomy, subsequent regulatory reforms have also strengthened national coordination, creating challenges in defining the limits of governmental authority. This study analyzes the constitutional framework and regulatory evolution governing central–regional authority relations in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia while offering a comparative analysis of successive regional government laws to explain the shift in the distribution of governmental authority. Employing normative legal research, the study adopts statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches by examining the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 22 of 1999, Law No. 32 of 2004, Law No. 23 of 2014, Law No. 1 of 2022, and relevant legal literature. The findings demonstrate a regulatory shift from centralized governance toward broad decentralization and subsequently toward stronger national coordination through a more structured allocation of governmental affairs. The comparative analysis further reveals that although the constitutional framework provides a clear legal basis for regional autonomy, overlapping authority, inconsistent interpretation of concurrent affairs, and coordination problems continue to generate legal uncertainty across strategic sectors. These findings contribute by clarifying the constitutional evolution of authority allocation in Indonesia and suggest the need to harmonize sectoral legislation with the Regional Government Law, strengthen transitional arrangements following regulatory reforms, and establish clearer institutional coordination mechanisms to improve legal certainty and governance effectiveness.

References

Alam, G. M. (2023). Transforming the paradigm of public university leadership into a more political one in emerging nations: a case of Bangladesh. International Journal of Management in Education, 17(3), 277-296.

Altamimi, H., Liu, Q., & Jimenez, B. (2023). Not too much, not too little: Centralization, decentralization, and organizational change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 170-185.

Biswas, R. R., & Rahman, A. (2023). Adaptation to climate change: A study on regional climate change adaptation policy and practice framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 336, 117666.

Boufounou, P., Eriotis, N., Kounadeas, T., Argyropoulos, P., & Poulopoulos, J. (2024). Enhancing internal control mechanisms in local government organizations: a crucial step towards mitigating corruption and ensuring economic development. Economies, 12(4), 78.

Chen, X., & Ling, W. (2024). Coordinated regional economic development: a study of the relationship between regional policies and business performance. Economics, 18(1), 20220113.

Deberdt, R., & James, C. B. (2024). Self-governance at depth: the international seabed authority and verification culture of the deep-sea mining industry. Resources Policy, 89, 104577.

Habibi, D. (2025). Empowering Local Governments: Regional Autonomy as a Catalyst for Good Governance in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 13(1), 68-98.

Helwig, N., & Sinkkonen, V. (2022). Strategic autonomy and the EU as a global actor: The evolution, debate and theory of a contested term. European foreign affairs review, 27(Special).

Ibad, S. (2025). Analysis of the Concept of Regional Autonomy Based on Constitutional Development in Indonesia. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 1096-1111.

Indonesia. (1945). Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Information Division, Embassy of Indonesia.

Kuhlmann, S., Franzke, J., Peters, N., & Dumas, B. P. (2024). Institutional designs and dynamics of crisis governance at the local level: European governments facing the polycrisis. Policy Design and Practice, 7(4), 409-429.

Mahfud, M. (2007). Perdebatan hukum tata negara pasca amandemen konstitusi. Lp3es.

Maruf, M., Chang, Y. C., & Yang, L. (2024). Managing institutional interlinkages for the protection of marine environment in the East Asian seas region and beyond: The case of marine plastic pollution. Ocean & Coastal Management, 255, 107232.

Niessen, C. (2022). Measuring evolving regional autonomy demands and statutes: introducing the Sub-state Autonomy Scale (SAS). Regional studies, 56(9), 1589-1603.

Ratner, B. D., Larson, A. M., Barletti, J. P. S., ElDidi, H., Catacutan, D., Flintan, F., ... & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2022). Multistakeholder platforms for natural resource governance: lessons from eight landscape-level cases. Ecology and Society, 27(2).

Riyanto, A. (2026). Aktualisasi Negara Kesatuan Setelah Perubahan Atas Pasal 18 UUD 1945. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 36(1), 1.

Rochmayanto, Y., Nurrochmat, D. R., Nugroho, B., Darusman, D., Satria, A., Casse, T., ... & Wicaksono, D. (2023). Devolution of forest management to local communities and its impacts on livelihoods and deforestation in Berau, Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(5).

Sager, F., & Gofen, A. (2022). The polity of implementation: Organizational and institutional arrangements in policy implementation. Governance, 35(2), 347-364.

Sulaiman, K. F., Satriawan, I., Musa, N., & Fathi, M. (2025). A comparison of decentralization policy in Indonesia and Malaysia. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah, 10(1), 297-321.

Suriadi, H., Magriasti, L., & Frinaldi, A. (2023). Sejarah perkembangan desentralisasi dan otonomi daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Ilmu, 2(2), 193-210.

Van Vollenhoven, C., Holleman, J. F., & Sonius, H. W. J. (2013). Van Vollenhoven on Indonesian adat law. Springer.

Wan, Y. K. P., Li, X., Lau, V. M. C., & Dioko, L. D. (2022). Destination governance in times of crisis and the role of public-private partnerships in tourism recovery from COVID-19: The case of Macao. Journal of hospitality and tourism management, 51, 218-228.

Wandaogo, A. A. (2022). Does digitalization improve government effectiveness? Evidence from developing and developed countries. Applied Economics, 54(33), 3840-3860.

Widodo, I. S., Muhtar, M. H., Suhariyanto, D., Permana, D. Y., Bariah, C., Widodo, M. F. S., ... & Susmayanti, R. (2023). Hukum Tata Negara. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Xu, M., Wang, H., & Luan, S. (2026). Selective decentralization under the trend of centralization: reforms in China’s governmental power of environmental governance from 1973 to 2023. Journal of Public Policy, 46(1), 75-101.

Yang, Z., & Solangi, Y. A. (2024). Analyzing the relationship between natural resource management, environmental protection, and agricultural economics for sustainable development in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 450, 141862.

Yi, C., & Qiu, X. (2025). From local government to local governance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 84(1), 102-124.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-17

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...