The Analysis of Obligation Disputes on Returned Partnership Funds in Religious High Court of Medan

Cucu Susilawati Effendi

Abstract


This research is motivated by the partnership dispute on financing contract between PT. Bank Sumut Syariah;Branch Padang sidimpuan and Rip. Ongku Sutan Harahap. its dispute was occurred after the customer death,and so on causing the termination of the financing installment, because the financing is not covered by the insurance, so the bank asks the heir to be responsible for completing the remaining installment of the financing. The settlement of the dispute is settled through a litigation under the agreement of both parties to the dispute. The results of this study obtained that, PT. Bank Sumut Syariah Branch of Padangsidimpuan has neglected to apply the principle of prudence in the musyarakah (partnership) financing contract, namely disbursing financing funds without first being insured. Therefore, the Panel of Judges of  Medan Religious Court granted the heirs' petition. But the decision was canceled by the Medan High Religious Court, because the Panel of Judges found a formal defect in the form of obscuur libel, error in persona, disqualification in person. The formal defect resulted in the lawsuit not being accepted or N.O. (Niet Ontvankelijk verklaard). With the verdict N.O (Niet Ontvankelijk verklaard), the case becomes the quo status, it means back to its original state. Thus, the partnership (musyarakah) financing contract will remain valid and binding on both parties, their rights and obligations must be implemented in accordance with the contract.


Keywords


Partnerships financing; Medan Religious High Court; Niet Ontvankelijk verklaard

Article metrics

Abstract views : 31


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v5i2.1917

References


Al-Syathibi.Aspek Teologis: Konsep Maslahah in Kitab al-Muwafakat,Jakarta: Erlangga, 2007.

Apeldoorn, L. J. Van. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita, 2011.

Crawley, John dan Graham,Katherine.Mediation for Managers, Penyelesaian Konflik & Pemulihan Kembali Hubungan di Tempat Kerja Terj.Sudarmaji.Jakarta: PT. Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2006.

Ministry of Religious Affairs, Mushaf Al-Qur’an Terjemah, Jakarta: Al-Huda, 2005.

Dewi,Gemala Wirdayaningsih, Yeni Salma Barlinti, Hukum Perikatan Islam di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005.

Dewi,Gemala. Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Jakarta; Kencana, 2008.

Djamil,Faturrahman. Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah di Bank Syariah, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Fatwa Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI) Nomor 08/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 tentang Akad Musyarakah.

Fuady,Munir. Hukum Kontrak (Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis),Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.

Harun,Badriyah.Tata Cara Menghadapi Gugatan, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2009.

Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR).

Hutabarat,M.P. Penawaran dan Penerimaan dalam Hukum Perjanjian,Jakarta: Grasindo, 2010.

Jahar, Asep Saepudin,. dkk. 2013. Hukum Keluarga, Pidana dan Bisnis (Kajian Perundang-Undangan Indonesia, Fiqih dan Hukum Internasional), Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Kamello, Tan dalam O.C Kaligis, Asas Kepatutan dalam Arbitrase, Bandung: Alumni, 2009.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Buku III tentang Perikatan.

Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Buku II tentang Akad.

Kusumawanta,Dominikus Gusti Bagus.Imam di Ambang Batas, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2009.

Kuswadi, Meningkatkan Laba Melalui Pendekatan Akuntansi Keuangan dan Akuntansi Biaya, Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo, 2005.

Lemek, Jeremias. Penuntun Membuat Gugatan, Yogyakarta: New Merah Putih, 2010.

Manan, Muhammad Abdul. Teori dan Praktek Ekonomi Islam, Yogyakarta: PT. Dana Bakhti Prima Yas, 1997.

Manan,Abdul.Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2005.

Marbun,Rocky.Kiat Jitu Menyelesaikan Kasus Hukum, Jakarta: VisiMedia, 2011.

Mardani, Hukum Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2011.

Marwa, M. dan Jimmy, Kamus Hukum, Surabaya: Reality Publisher, 2009.

Mertokusumo,Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1988.

Mujahidin, Ahmad. Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syariah (lengkap dengan blanko-blanko), Jakarta: IKAHI-MA-RI, 2008.

-----------------------. Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2012.

-----------------------. 2010. Kewenangan dan Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 02 Tahun 2008 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.

Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 15/14/PBI/2013 tentang Unit Usaha Syariah.

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Medan Nomor 967/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Mdn.

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Medan Nomor 124/Pdt.G/2013/PTA.Mdn.

R. Subekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: PT.

Reglement op de Rechtsvordering (Rv).

Simatupang,Richard Burton. Aspek Hukum dalam BisnisJakarta: PT. Rinerka Cipta, 2013.

Simatupang ,Richard Burton. Aspek Hukum dalam Bisnis, Jakarta: PT. Rinerka Cipta, 2003.Cet. Ke-2.

Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: Intermasa, 1985.

----------. Hukum Perjanjian,Jakarta: Intermasa, 1991. Cet. XIII.

Sulistyowati, Irianto. 2001. Antropologi Hukum: Sebuah Bunga Rampai, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Syarifin, Pipin.Pengantar Ilmu Hukum,Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia, 1999.

Tunggal, Amin Widjaya dan Tunggal,Arif Djohan.Aspek Yuridis dalam LeasingJakarta: PT. Rinerka Cipta, 2001.

Law Number 21 Year 2008 regarding Sharia Banking.

Law Number 3 Year 2006 concerning Amendment to Law Number 7 Year 1989 on Religious Courts

Law Number 30 Year 1999 on Arbitration and Settlement of Disputes.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Flag Counter

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

International Journal of Nusantara Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License