Religious Social Capital in Creating Peace Values in Multicultural Societies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v6i1.54189Kata Kunci:
interfaith dialogue, local wisdom, multiculturalism, religious social capital, toleranceAbstrak
Indonesia's cultural and ethnic diversity holds great potential for social integration, but is also prone to conflict. In this context, religion plays a dual role: it can be both a trigger for tension and a bridge for peace. This study examines the role of religion as social capital in fostering harmony in a pluralistic society. The approach used was a qualitative literature study, analyzed thematically. The results indicate that religious social capital plays a crucial role in fostering peace in multicultural societies through three main elements: religious networks, social trust, and the integration of religious values with local culture, which fosters harmony. Concrete findings are demonstrated through studies of various communities such as peaceful Islamic boarding schools (pesantren), the Forum for Interfaith Harmony (FKUB), and the Gusdurian network, which implement inclusive education, open religious practices, and interfaith advocacy. These three elements form the foundation of social reconciliation based on spirituality and local wisdom, and demonstrate that religious organizations such as Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and Muhammadiyah can become agents of peace if they prioritize an inclusive and contextual approach. This study enriches social capital theory by integrating religious and local values, and offers a new direction in the development of inclusive Islamic education and interfaith dialogue relevant to societal realities.
Referensi
Asmikhazali, M. (2021). Agama dan perdamaian: studi perbandingan dialog antar iman menurut pemikiran mohammed abu-nimer dan pemikiran dialog antar iman di indonesia. Sekolah Pascasarjana UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Banks, J. A. (1997). Educating Citizens in a Multicultural Society. Multicultural Education Series. ERIC.
Bourdieu, P. (2019). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. In Social Stratification, Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, Second Edition (pp. 499–525). Routledge.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Effendy, B. (1998). Islam dan negara: Transformasi pemikiran dan praktik politik Islam di Indonesia. (No Title).
Geertz, C. (1976). The religion of Java. University of Chicago Press.
Gumilar, S., Rahman, M. T., Truna, D. S., & Waehama, M. R. (2025). Unveiling unity: how Thailand’s Muslim minorities weave a multicultural society. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2579170. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2579170
Hallinan, M. T. (2006). Handbook of the Sociology of Education. Springer Science & Business Media.
Hosnan, H. (2022). Multicultural based inclusive Islamic education model in schools. Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 1(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33650/ijess.v1i1.4286
Malau, T. W. (2024). Dialog Antaragama Dan Kontribusi Tokoh Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Dan Implementasinya Untuk Memperkuat Toleransi. Jurnal Magistra, 2(1), 1–18.
Mubarok, M. F., & Rahman, M. T. (2021). Membandingkan Konsep Islam Keindonesiaan dengan Islam Nusantara dalam Kerangka Pluralisme. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 1(4), 412–422.
Mujani, S., & Liddle, R. W. (2009). Muslim Indonesia’s secular democracy. Asian Survey, 49(4), 575–590.
Ngabalin, M., Lattu, I. Y. M., & Listyani, L. (2024). Konsep Dialog Agama Menurut Paul F. Kniter dan Implikasinya bagi Hubungan Antar Umat Beragama di Kabupaten Fak-Fak. KENOSIS: Jurnal Kajian Teologi, 10(1), 22–46.
Purba, R. A. M., Rahman, M. T., & Huriyani, Y. (2026). Review of Grace Davie’s Analytical Work in the Handbook of the Sociology of Religion and Its Relevance to the Indonesian Context. Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, 6(01), 72–85.
Purnawan, I. B. (2013). Agama Dan Multikultur: Peran Agama Mewujudkan Multikulturalisme Di Indonesia. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol12.iss3.art1
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon Schuster.
Rahman, M. T., & Setia, P. (2022). Organisasi gerakan Islamis dan keamanan di Jawa Barat dan Banten. Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Ropi, I. (2017). Religion and Regulation in Indonesia. Palgrave Macmillan.
Santiawan, I. N., & Warta, I. N. (2021). Dialog Lintas Iman Sebagai Upaya Memperkuat Moderasi Beragama. Widya Aksara: Jurnal Agama Hindu, 26(1), 102–110.
Truna, D. S. (2024). Agama dan masyarakat dalam perspektif Sosiologi. Gunung Djati Publishing.
Wibisono, M. Y., Kodir, A., & Setia, P. (2024). Idealisasi dan rencana aksi Moderasi Beragama di kalangan mahasiswa Teologi berbeda agama di Indonesia. Gunung Djati Publishing.
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Siti Madinatul Munawwaroh, Raden Roro Sri Rejeki Waluyajati, Kustana Kustana
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).