Librarian Management and INLISLite-Based Library Automation in Elementary Schools

Librarian Management and INLISLite-Based Library Automation in Elementary Schools

Penulis

  • Maria Kleovita Putri Vindusari Universitas Islam Nusantara, Bandung
  • Endang Komara Universitas Islam Nusantara, Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v6i3.56141

Kata Kunci:

elementary education, INLISlite, library automation, management of learning, school librarian

Abstrak

Advances in information technology have redefined the role of school libraries as active hubs for digital literacy. In elementary schools, the librarian function is frequently assigned to teachers as an additional responsibility, requiring them to manage book circulation, maintain collection records, and facilitate digital services through the INLISLite system. Although this platform enhances operational efficiency and supports students’ digital literacy development, challenges persist due to limited technological proficiency, inadequate infrastructure, and the dual obligations placed on teachers. This study investigates the implementation of librarian management in INLISLite-based automation at SDN Rawa Buaya 07 and SDN Slipi 07 in West Jakarta. Employing Deming’s PDCA (Plan–Do–Check–Act) quality management cycle as a conceptual framework, the research underscores continuous improvement through systematic planning, execution, monitoring, and corrective measures. A qualitative case study design was adopted, with data obtained from principals, teacher-librarians, and students via interviews, observations, and document analysis. Data were processed through reduction, display, and interpretation to draw meaningful conclusions. Findings indicate that the effectiveness of INLISLite automation is constrained by the absence of professional librarians and the limited competencies of other teachers. Consequently, strong principal support and collaborative teacher involvement are essential to optimize library management practices and foster a sustainable digital literacy environment.

Referensi

Abubakar, H. R. (2021). Pengantar metodologi penelitian. SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Aminah, S. (2019). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Prenada Media.

Anindya, E. F., & Wicaksono, M. F. (2021). Analisis Pemanfaatan Inlislite (Integrated Library System) Di Dinas Kearsipan Dan Perpustakaan Kabupaten Trenggalek. Shaut Al-Maktabah: Jurnal Perpustakaan, Arsip Dan Dokumentasi, 13(1), 67–84.

Anwar, R. K., Komariah, N., & Rahman, M. T. (2017). Pengembangan Konsep Literasi Informasi Santri: Kajian di Pesantren Arafah Cililin Bandung Barat. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v2i1.964

Beeson Jackie, I. C. (2015). Information systems meets information science. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05020003

Deming, W. (1986). Edwards, Out of the Crisis, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54.

Floridi, L. (2025). Content Studies: A New Academic Discipline for Analysing, Evaluating, and Designing Content in a Digital and AI-Driven Age. Philosophy & Technology, 38(2), 1–17.

Ghanad, A. (2023). An overview of quantitative research methods. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 6(08), 3794–3803.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Novelli, C., Casolari, F., Rotolo, A., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2024). AI Risk Assessment: A Scenario-Based, Proportional Methodology for the AI Act. Digital Society, 3(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00095-1

Rahman, M. T. (2020). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Rahmi, A., & Najamudin, N. (2022). Efektivitas Penerapan Sistem Aplikasi INLISLITE (Integrated Library System) Pada Kegiatan Penginputan Data Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Kabupaten Aceh Barat. Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG), 4(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24076/jspg.v4i2.931

Sanusi, A. (2023). Sistem nilai: Alternatif wajah-wajah pendidikan. Nuansa Cendekia.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Technology, A. S. for I. S. and. (2011). Introduction to Information Science and Technology (D. Davis Shaw C H (ed.); 1st ed.). Information Today, Inc.

Yusuf, A. M. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif & penelitian gabungan. Prenada Media.

Diterbitkan

2026-09-21
Loading...