Efektivitas SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2023 Dalam Menekan Angka Perceraian 2023-2025 Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Mataram Kelas IA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v7i1.52397Keywords:
Legal Effectiveness, Divorce, Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 3 of 2023, Religious Court, Marital DisputesAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 3 of 2023 in reducing divorce rates at the Mataram Religious Court Class 1A, particularly divorces filed on the grounds of continuous disputes and quarrels. This research employs an empirical juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach. Primary data were obtained through interviews with judges, court clerks, and court officials, as well as documentation of divorce case data at the Mataram Religious Court. Secondary data were collected through a literature review of relevant laws and regulations, books, and academic journals. The data were analyzed using Lawrence M. Friedman’s theory of legal effectiveness, which emphasizes three elements of the legal system: legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. The results show that the implementation of SEMA No. 3 of 2023 at the Mataram Religious Court is carried out through two main stages: the filtering and educational stage at the One-Stop Integrated Service (PTSP) before case registration, and the case examination stage during court proceedings by the panel of judges. Empirically, the policy indicates a decrease in the percentage of divorces based on continuous disputes and quarrels in 2025, although the overall divorce rate remains relatively high. From the perspective of legal effectiveness theory, this policy can be considered relatively effective in terms of legal substance and legal structure due to clear regulatory provisions and proper implementation by judicial officials. However, its effectiveness is still constrained by the legal culture of society, where many litigants tend to seek quicker divorce processes and have limited understanding of the applicable legal provisions.
References
Amri, M. Saeful. “Mitsaqan Ghalidza in the Age of Disruption (Study of Divorce Due to Social Media).” Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Dan Penelitian Hukum Islam 3, no. 1 (2020): 89.
Friedman, Lawrence M. Legal System, The: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation, 1975. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610442282.
Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafia, 2018.
Kasim, Nur Mohamad, and Fibriyanti Karim. “The Impact of Mediation on the Settlement of Divorce Cases in Religious Courts.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 10, no. 1 (2025): 28–41. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i1.10912.
“LPK PA Mataram 2023.” Pengadilan Agama Mataram Kelas 1A, n.d. https://www.pa-mataram.go.id/.
“LPK PA Mataram 2024.” Mataram, 2024. https://www.pa-mataram.go.id/.
“LPK PA Mataram 2025.” Mataram, n.d. https://www.pa-mataram.go.id/.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 tentang Pedoman Pemenuhan Alasan Perceraian dalam Hal Terjadi Perselisihan dan Pertengkaran Secara Terus-Menerus. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2023. (2023).
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2022 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan, Surat Edaran § (2022).
Miles, Michael Huberman Matthew. “Qualitative Data Analysis An Expanded Sourcebook 2nd Edition.” United State of America: Sage Publication, 1994.
Muhammad, AbdulKadir. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Pengadilan Agama Mataram Kelas IA. “LPK PA Mataram 2022.” Mataram, 2022. https://www.pa-mataram.go.id/.
Rihdo, Maulana, Ishaq Maulana Sudur, Ahsandy Ramadhan Suardi, Satriya Pamungkas, and Fauziyah Putri Meilinda. “Kedudukan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (Sema) Dalam Perspektif Akademisi: Kekuatan Hukum, Ketetapan Dan Konsistensi, Pengaruh Terhadap Putusan Hukum.” USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 4, no. 2 (2023): 230–40. https://doi.org/10.46773/usrah.v4i2.791.
Sholeh, Muhammad. “Peningkatan Angka Perceraian Di Indonesia: Faktor Penyebab Khulu’ Dan Akibatnya” 01, no. 01 (2021): 29–40.
Susylawati, Eka. “Perselisihan Dan Pertengkaran Sebagai Alassan Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama” 3, no. 1 (2008).
“Tahapan-Tahapan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Agama.” Accessed March 29, 2026. https://pta-mataram.go.id/layanan-hukum/prosedur-pengajuan-dan-biaya-perkara/tahapan-tahapan-persidangan-di-pengadilan-agama.
Wahyu Mahdi Prananta, and Ifrohati. “Pertengkaran Terus Menerus Sebagai Alasan Paling Tinggi Pada Perkara Cerai Gugat Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas Ib Sungailiat.” Journal of Sharia and Legal Science 2, no. 2 (2024): 194–209. https://doi.org/10.61994/jsls.v2i2.675.
Wibisono, Yanki, Kuswanto Kuswanto, and Muhammad Ajid Husain. “Permasalahan Dan Penyebab Perceraian (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Jombang).” Justicia Journal 14, no. 1 (2025): 52–74. https://doi.org/10.32492/jj.v14i1.14104.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hammad Farobi Syahuda, Dwi Yulia Hariyani, Nurul Firdaus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


