Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Alat Perlindungan Hukum: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Malaysia, Dan Singapura

Authors

  • Akhmad Kamil Rizani Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Dakhoir Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Aris Sunandar Suradilaga Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Aulia Rahman Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v7i1.53218

Keywords:

Marriage Law, Marital Agreements, Legal Protection

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare the regulation of marital agreements as instruments of legal protection within the family law systems of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. The study departs from the transformation of the classical Islamic law concept of taklik talak into modern positive legal constructions that accommodate the need to protect the rights and obligations of spouses. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal materials consist of statutory regulations, classical and contemporary fiqh doctrines, academic literature, and relevant court decisions. The results of the study show that in Indonesia, the regulation of marriage agreements is contained in Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, and Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, characterized by increased flexibility following a Constitutional Court decision allowing agreements to be concluded after the marriage has taken place. In Malaysia, the regulation is more systematically structured under the Akta Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan) 1984, which positions taklik as an integral component of Islamic family law administration. Meanwhile, in Singapore, the regulation falls within the framework of the Administration of Muslim Law Act 1966, which institutionally integrates Sharia principles into the national legal system. Comparatively, the three countries share similarities in recognizing marital agreements as preventive instruments of legal protection, yet they differ in terms of formation procedures, validation mechanisms, and binding force. The study concludes that the effectiveness of marital agreements is significantly influenced by each country’s normative design and institutional legal structure. Therefore, strengthening regulatory frameworks and harmonizing legal protection principles based on justice and legal certainty are urgent necessities for the development of Islamic family law in Southeast Asia.

References

Abu Bakr, Muhammad ibn. Mukhtār Al-Siḥāḥ. Beirut: Maktabah Lubnan, 1986.

Aburaera, Soekarno. Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2013.

Administration of Muslim Law Act, Act No. 27 of 1966 (n.d.).

Administration of Muslim Law Act, Act No. 48 of 1966. (n.d.).

Al-Awqaf, Wizarah. Al-Mawsū’ah Al-Fiqhiyyah. Kuwait: Wizarah al-Awqaf wa al-Shu’un al-Islamiyyah, 1988.

Al-Dardir, Ahmad. Al-Syarḥ Al-Kabīr. Beirut: Dār Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, 2000.

Al-Ghazy, Muhammad bin Qasim. Fatḥu Al-Qarīb Al-Mujīb. Surabaya: Al-Hidayah, 1999.

Ani, Ni Kadek, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and Ida Ayu Putu Widiati. “Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Harta Bersama Akibat Perceraian.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 3, no. 1 (2021): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.3.1.2021.17-21.

Ar-Ramli, Syamsuddin. Nihāyah Al-Muhtāj Ila Syarh Al-Minhāj. Juz V. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1984.

Djamil, Fathurahman. Hukum Perjanjian Syariah Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.

Fauza, Nilna, and Moh Afandi. “Perjanjian Perkawinan Dalam Menjamin Hak-Hak Perempuan.” (Al-Manhaj: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Family Law) 2, no. 1 (2020): 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19105/al-manhaj.v2i1.3116.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (n.d.).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Putusan Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015. (n.d.).

Manan, Abdul. Reformasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.

Miszairi Sitiris, Mustafa Mat Jubri , Mohamad Sabri bin Zakaria, Mohd Na’im Mokhtar. “Talak Taklik Menurut Fiqah : Analisis Pelaksanaannya Dalam Undang-Undang.” Kanun: Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia 33, no. 1 (2021): 97–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37052/kanun.33(1)no5.

MK, Anshary. Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Muchsin. Perjanjian Perkawinan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Varia Peradilan, 2008.

Mudzhar, M. Atho, and Khoiruddin Nasution. Hukum Keluarga Di Dunia Islam Modern: Studi Perbandingan Dan Keberanjakan UU Modern Dari Kitab-Kitab Fikih. Jakarta: Ciputat Press, 2003.

Nasution, Khoiruddin. Hukum Perdata (Keluarga) Islam Indonesia Dan Perbandingan Hukum Perkawinan Di Dunia Muslim. Yogyakarta: Academia + Tazzafa, 2009.

———. “Menjamin Hak Perempuan Dengan Taklik Talak Dan Perjanjian Perkawinan.” Unisia 31, no. 70 (2008): 333–42. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol31.iss70.art3.

Nasution, Khoirudin. Status Wanita Di Asia Tenggara: Studi Terhadap Perundang-Undangan Perkawinan Muslim Kontemporer Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia. Jakarta: INIS, 2002.

Nawi, Nor Fadzlina. “Taklik Agreement: A Proposal for Reformation.” Wahana Akademik 2, no. 1 (2003): 85–98.

Nizam, Ahmad. “THE ISLAMIC LEGAL SYSTEM IN SINGAPORE Ahmad Nizam Bin Abbas † Unlike Its Larger Neighbors — Indonesia and Malaysia — Singapore Has a Non-Muslim Majority . 1 The Legal System Nevertheless Provides for a Muslim to Be Governed by Muslim Law — at Least in Som.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 21, no. 1 (2010): 164–87.

Nooryanto, Fista Hery, Maria Yosepin Endah Listyowati, and Diyah Setyaningrum. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Perkawinan Atas Harta Bersama Akibat Perceraian.” UNES Law Review 5, no. 4 (2023): 4588–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.799.

Nuruddin, Amiur, and Azhari Akmal Tarigan. Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2004.

Qudamah, Ibn. Al-Mugnīy. Al-Qāhirah: Maktab al-Qāhirah, 1968.

Rabu, Noormala, Halipah Hamzah, Mohd Fauzi Md Isa, and Zainal Fikri Zamzuri. “Ta’liq Talak: Antara Peruntukan Perundangan Dan Amalan Di Melaka.” In 2nd International Islamic Heritage Conference (ISHEC 2017), edited by Mohd Faizal P. Rameli, Abdul Qayuum Abdul Razak, Muhamad Taufik Md Sharipp, Mohd Zaid Mustafar, Mohd Khairul Nizam Mohd Aziz, Rawi Nordin, S. Salahudin Suyurno, and Dziauddin Sharif, 791–98. Malaysia: Akademi Pengajian Islam Kontemporari (Acis), Universiti Teknologi Mara Cawangan Melaka, 2017.

Rahman, Abdul Ghazaly. Fiqh Munakahat. Jakarta: Kencana, 2003.

Rusyd, Ibn. Bidāyah Al-Mujtahid. Al-Qāhirah: Dār al- Hadiṡ, 2004.

Sabiq, Sayyid. Fiqh As-Sunnah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1983.

Salim. Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.

Seksyen 124, Akta Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan) 1984. (n.d.).

Seksyen 50, Akta Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan) 1984 (n.d.).

Seksyen 50: Perjanjian di bawah taklik atau janji, Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Negeri Perlis 2006 (n.d.).

Setiawan, Iketut Oka. Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Sopiyan, Muhammad. “Analisis Perjanjian Perkawinan Dan Akibatnya Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” Misykat Al-Anwar Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Masyarakat 6, no. 2 (2023): 175–90. https://doi.org/10.24853/ma.6.2.175-190.

Sriono. “Perjanjian Kawin Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Dalam Perkawinan.” Jurnal Ilmiah "Advokasi” 04, no. 02 (2016): 69–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v4i2.336.

Supramono, Gatot. Segi-Segi Hukum Hubungan Luar Nikah. Jakarta: Djambatan, 1998.

Supriadi, Dedi, and Mustofa. Perbandingan Hukum Perkawinan Di Dunia Islam. Bandung: Pustaka Al-Fikriis, 2009.

Syarifuddin, Amir. Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

———. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.

Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (2019).

Weng, Henry Lee A. Beberapa Segi Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Perkawinan. Medan: Rainbow, 1990.

Wulandari, Mira, Puji Sulistyaningsih, and Dakum. “Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Sarana Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kedua Belah Pihak Dalam Perkawinan.” Borobudur Law and Society 2, no. 3 (2023): 94–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31603/10082.

Yacob, Abdul Monir. Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Dalam Mahkamah Syariyah Dan Mahkamah Sipil Di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Kefahaman Malaysia (IKIM), 1995.

Yuniardi, Harry, Laras Shesa, Hamza Abed, and Alkarim Hammad. “Criticism of Taklik Talak as an Effort to Protect Women’s Right in Indonesian Marriage Law.” Madania Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 28, no. 2 (2024): 203–14. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/madania.v28i2.5924.

Yunus, Mahmud. Kamus Arab-Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Mahmud Yunus Wadzuariyyah, 2010.

Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Uṣūl Al-Fiqh Islamiy. 2nd ed. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-14

How to Cite

Akhmad Kamil Rizani, Ahmad Dakhoir, Aris Sunandar Suradilaga, & Muhammad Aulia Rahman. (2026). Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Alat Perlindungan Hukum: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Malaysia, Dan Singapura. Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Peradilan Islam, 7(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v7i1.53218

Citation Check