Urgensi Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999: Uji Arbitrabilitas Dan Pengaturan Arbitrase Syariah Digital Dalam Sengketa Harta Bersama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v7i2.55843Keywords:
Digital Sharia Arbitration, Joint Property, Dispute Resolution, Religious Court, Legal Reform.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the limitations of the regulation of arbitration under Law Number 30 of 1999 in accommodating the development of digital sharia arbitration, particularly in resolving joint marital property disputes, and to formulate normative solutions through regulatory reform. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, using secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that the regulation of arbitration under Law Number 30 of 1999 remains conventional and does not explicitly accommodate digital arbitration or sharia-based arbitration. Furthermore, there is a jurisdictional conflict between the District Court and the Religious Court regarding the enforcement of arbitration awards related to joint marital property, resulting in legal uncertainty and enforcement obstacles. Therefore, a normative reconstruction is necessary through the inclusion of provisions on digital sharia arbitration, the validity of electronic processes, and the authority of Religious Courts to enforce arbitration awards in family law matters. This study concludes that revising Law Number 30 of 1999 is essential to establish a dispute resolution system that is adaptive, integrative, and grounded in principles of justice in the digital era.
References
Afsaloka, Tetri Mutiara. “Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Syariah Internasional Di Indonesia.” Ariyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Bisnis 1, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.36908/ariyah.v1i2.1606.
Anggara, Bionda Johan, and Warsifah Warsifah. “Penerapan Hukum Kepailitan Dalam Kaitannya Kedudukan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Sebagai Institusi Pengatur Dan Pengawas Perusahaan Asuransi Negara (Contoh Kasus PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya).” JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 5, no. 4 (2022): 1250–59. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i4.555.
Arifin, Zainal. “Arbitrase Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Himmah volume 7 nomor 18 (2006).
Aurilya, Tasya, and Rudy Hartono. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Akibat Perceraian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata (Studi Analisa Putusan Nomor 282 K/Pdt/2014).” UNES Law Review 4, no. 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v4i4.
Elvia, Evi Eka, Abdul Mujib, Azhar Nor, and Muhammad Imanuddin Akbar. “BASYARNAS as a Place for Dispute Resolution of Musyarakah Financing in Sharia Banking in the Disruption Era.” El-Mashlahah 13, no. 1 (2023): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v13i1.5345.
Faizun, Ahmad. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Akad Musyarakah di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Analisis Putusan Basyarnas Yogyakarta No X/Tahun 2017).” Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum 6, no. 2 (2021): 195–212. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v6i2.3864.
Fiantika Armanda, Salsa Luthfiah Rezki, and Kurniati Kurniati. “Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini yang Berkeadilan Gender di Indonesia.” JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL 4, no. 3 (2025): 278–90. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v4i3.5764.
Fikri, Zainul. “Pandangan Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam Terhadap Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini.” Sahaja: Journal Sharia and Humanities 2, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.61159/sahaja.v2i2.126.
Firdawaty, Linda, Habib Shulton Asnawi, and Siti Mahmudah. “Semanda Lekok in the Sai Batin Community, Lampung: Wife’s Domination of Marital Assets from Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah Perspective.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 3 (2024): 1734. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i3.19894.
Idandi Limbong, Irfan Maulana Siregar, Chairul Azmi Nasution, Raja Muhammad Fahreza, Muhammad Fadil, and Nurul Kholis. “Arbitrase Syariah Di Indonesia : Tantangan Dan Solusi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 4 (2024): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v1i4.135.
Khairina, Khairina, Khairani Khairani, Roni Efendi, Kasmuri Kasmuri, and Okky Afrianto. “Reforming the Rules on the Division of Joint Property: A Progressive Legal Approach.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 23, no. 1 (2024): 193. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v23i1.11565.
Mansari, Mansari, Khairuddin Hasballah, Soraya Devy, Irwansyah Irwansyah, and Muhammad Rais. “Division of Joint Assets Based on the Implementation of Responsibilities: Analysis of Sharia Court Decisions Based on Jurisprudence and Their Legal Implications in Banda Aceh.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 8, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v8i2.25184.
Ma’rifat, Muchammad Ariyahdul. “Penggunaan Harta Bersama (Gono-Gini) Harus Melalui Persetujuan Suami Dan Istri.” Justicia Journal 13, no. 2 (2024): 232–55. https://doi.org/10.32492/jj.v13i2.13210.
Munawar, Atful. “Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara dalam Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam.” Kosmik Hukum 22, no. 3 (2022): 234. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v22i3.15483.
Novel, Mochamad, Michael Vernando Sirait, Natanael, Benedict Artika Sari Asmin, and Elissa Virginia. “KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK DAN BATASANNYA: Analisis Dalam Perspektif Contract Drafting.” Journal Publicuho 8, no. 4 (2025): 2605–18. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v8i4.992.
Nurhabni. “Peran Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah.” Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah 5, no. 3 (2024): 357–65. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtishaduna.vi.46039.
Nurhabni. “PERAN BADAN ARBITRASE SYARIAH NASIONAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS SYARIAH.” Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah, April 30, 2024, 357–65. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtishaduna.vi.46039.
Pertiwi, Kunti Tri. PROBLEMATIKA DAN SOLUSI HUKUM TERHADAP HARTA GONO-GINI YANG MASIH BERSTATUS KREDIT. 5, no. 1 (n.d.).
Saepullah, Usep. “Legal Certainty of Arbitration in The Settlement of Islamic Economic Civil Cases in The Perspective of Positive Law in Indonesia.” Al-’Adalah 19, no. 2 (2022): 261–90. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v19i2.14384.
Sebayiga, Vianney. “The Arbitrability of Family Disputes in Kenya: A Case Study of the Court of Appeal Decision in TSJ v SHSR (2019) eKLR.” Available at SSRN 4136412, ahead of print, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4136412.
Shomad, Abd, and Sri Hajati. “Prenuptial Agreement and the Principle of Balanced Justice in the Division of Joint Property in Islamic Marriage Law.” Yuridika 40, no. 1 (2025): 129–42. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v40i1.60238.
Supeno, Supeno, Muhtar Dahri, and Hafid Zakariya. “Kedudukan Asas Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Arbitrase Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999.” Wajah Hukum 3, no. 1 (2019): 51. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v3i1.45.
Wahidin, Fifin Anisatu Zahro. “Kajian Normatif Yuridis Terhadap Peran Lembaga Arbitrase Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah.” Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) 3, no. 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.17157017.
Yulistyaputri, Rizkisyabana, and Ratih Lestarini. “Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision: Pemberdayaan Konsumen: Melindungi Hak Konsumen Melalui Proses Arbitrase Di BPSK Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 3 (2023): 406–22. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2033.
Zamaludin, Riswan, and Abdul Muiz Nuroni. “Arbitrase Syariah Dalam Perspektif Undang Undang No 30 Tahun 1999.” Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika 3, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.36312/jcm.v3i2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Waliyuddin Yusuf, Mochamad Alfan Nuruddin, Imron Rosyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
