Komunikasi Crosshijaber di Kota Bandung


Enjang As(1*), Mukhlis Aliyudin(2), Ujang Rohman(3)

(1) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Indonesia
(2) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Indonesia
(3) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to determine the motives of the goals and causes of Crosshijaber Communication Behavior in the city of Bandung. This study uses a phenomenological method with a qualitative approach. The process of collecting data was obtained through in-depth interviews and observations of informants. The results showed that the motives that caused Crosshijaber's Communication Behavior were, among others, because of problems within themselves and their families, thus creating a sense of trauma to the perpetrators. They feel bored with their original appearance and make them do something new. Interest in hijab makes them want to try using it, while the motives for Crosshijaber Communication Behavior are, among others, feeling suitable when they use the hijab after they wear the hijab the Crosshijaber actors will get happiness, their goal of using the hijab is to want to be a better person, to satisfy their sense of belonging. I'm curious why women using hijab become more beautiful.


Keywords


Reality, Communication Behavior, Crosshijaber

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alwasilah, A. C. (2012). Pokoknya Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya. Andrew F. Wood & Matthew J. Smith. 2005. Online Communication: Linking Technology, Identity and Culture. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.

Allen, S. 2014. Whither the transvestite? Theorising male-to-female transvestism in feminist and queer theory. Feminist Theory, 15(1), 51–72.doi:10.1177/1464700113515171

Almquist, Y.B, & Brannstrom, L. 2014. Childhood peer status and the clustering of social, economic, and health-related circumstances in adulthood. Social Science & Medicine, 105, 67–75.

Antaranews.com. (2019). “Viral soal „crosshijaber‟, Apakah itu?” Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/1111266/viral-soal-crosshijaber-apakah-itu.

American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Astria Yuli Satyarini Sukendar, Amanda Raissa, Tomy Michael. 2020. The Phenomenon Of Cross Hijabers In The Lens Of Law And Human Rights In Indonesia http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0220.php?rp=P989682. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Budi, Rayudaswati. 2010. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Makassar: KRETAKUPAPrint Makassar.

Butler, Judith.1990. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.

Barrocas, A.L., & others. 2015. Nonsuicidal self- injury in adolescence: Longitudinal course, trajectories, and interapersonal predictors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 369–380.

Budi, Susetyo. 2010. Statistika untuk Analisis Data Penelitian. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Brannan, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Mohr, C. D., Mortazavi, S., & Stein, N. 2013. Friends and family: A cross-cultural investigation of social support and subjective well-being among college students. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(1), 65–75.doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.743573

Choukas-Bradley, S., Giletta, M., Widman, L., Cohen, G.L., & Prinstein, M.J. 2014. Experimentally measured susceptibility to peer influence and adolescent sexual behavior trajectories: A preliminary study. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2221–2227.

Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods

Approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Debora, 2019. Crosshijaber Instagram Viral, Bagaimana Terjadi. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/crosshijaber-instagram-viral-bagaimana-terjadi-ejGX

Demir, H, K., Dereboy, F., Dereboy, C. 2009. Identity Confusion and Psychopathology in Late Adolescence. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry.

Evans, S.Z., Simons, L.G., & Simons, R.L. (2015, in press). Factors that influence trajectories of delinquency throughout adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

Fakih, Mansour. (2008). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gainor, K. A. 2000. Including transgender issues in lesbian, gay and bisexual psychology. Education, Research, And Practice in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, And Transgendered Psychology: A Resource Manual, 5, 131–160.

Gunawan, Imam. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Hasbiansyah, O. 2005. “Pendekatan Fenomenologi: Pengantar Praktik Penelitiandalam Ilmu Sosial dan Komunikasi”. Jurnal Mediator. Vol. 9(1).

Hermawati, Tanti. 2007. Budaya Jawa dan Kesetaraan Gender. Surakarta:Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Hidayat, Hamdan. 2020. Crosshijaber Antara Trend dan Gejolak Sosial (Analisis Perilaku Crosshijaber Perspektif Al-Quran dan Psikologi). Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama danJender Vol. 19, No. 2, 2020, Hal. 190 - 202

Iriantara, Yosal. 2014. “Komunikasi Antar Pribadi dalam Kehidupan Manusia.

Modul Universitas Terbuka.

Iskandar, Doni., Jacky, M. 2015. Studi Fenomenologi Motif Anggota Satuan Resimen Mahasiswa 804 Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Mahasiswa Unesa.

Kuswarno, Engkus. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi Fenomenologi; Konsepsi, Pedoman, dan Contoh Penelitian. Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.

Landolt, M.A., Bartholomew, K., Saffrey, C. et al. 2004. Gender Nonconformity, Childhood Rejection, and Adult Attachment: A Study of Gay Men. Arch Sex Behav 33, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000014326.64934.50

Littlejohn, Stephen W. dan Foss. A. Karen. 2016. Ensiklopedia Teori Komunikasi.

Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.

Lips, Hilary M., 1993, Sex & Gender an Introduction, California, London, Toronto:Mayfield Publising Company.

Maulina Sri Wahyuni, Neng via Siti Rodiyah, dkk. 2020. FENOMENA CROSSHIJABER PERSPEKTIF HADIS. Digilib UIN SGD Bandung.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Morissan, M.A. & Dr. Andy Corry Wardhani & Dr. Farid Hamid U, 2011. Teori

Komunikasi Massa Peneliti. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Muhammad Yusup. 2020. PENGELOLAAN KESAN “CROSSDRESSER COSPLAYPRIA DI KOTA BANDUNG. E-library Unikom.

Newton, J. (2001). A boredom theory of youth criminality. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/335

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Life-span development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schutz, Alfred. 1970.On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Schutz, Alfred., 1972.The Phenomenology of The Social World. London: Heinemann Educational Books

Serano, J. 2009. Psychology, Sexualization and Trans-Invalidations. Keynote lecture presented at the 8th Annual Philadelphia Trans-Health Conference. Retrieved from http://www.juliaserano.com/av/Serano-TransInvalidations.pdf.

Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprapto, Tommy. 2009. Pengantar Teori dan Manajemen Komunikasi.

Tierney, Helen. Women's Studies Encyclopedia, Vol. 1. New York: Green Wood Press, T.th.

Upadhyaya, Mihir & Korenis, Panagiota. 2018. Cross-dressing as a defense mechanism against loss in a bisexual male, Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 22:4, 412-420, DOI: 10.1080/19359705.2018.1501539

Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language; an American dictionary first published in 1951 and currently published by John Wiley &Sons.

Winters, K.2009. Issues of Psychiatric Diagnosis of Cross-Dressers. From http://www.gidreform.org/tf3023.html.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v5i1.12698

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Enjang As

Creative Commons License

Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stat View MyStat