Ittijah Tafsir Falsafi: Analisis Tafsir Penciptaan Alam Menurut Imam Al-Ghazali dan Al-Farabi


Pebriani Srifatonah(1*), Siti Aminah(2), Eni Zulaiha(3)

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(2) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(3) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


One of the models for the interpretation of the Qur'an is the ittijah of philosophical interpretation, which emerged in the Middle Ages or during the heyday of Islamic scholarship related to philosophy and religion. Some scholars say that philosophical thought cannot be reconciled with religion. Because philosophy is the result of human thought, while religion comes from God. This article tries to analyze the thoughts of Ibn Rushd and Imam Ghazal when explaining in the interpretation of verses related to the world of Qadim. Furthermore, the researcher will apply qualitative methods in compiling this writing, where the results of this research are related to the idea of philosophical interpretation in which the form of interpretation of the verses of the Qur'an uses philosophical thoughts or views. This cannot be distinguished from the views of the scholars regarding this philosophical interpretation in their journey. In this ittijah interpretation, the scholars have different opinions. First, a group of scholars who accept the existence of a philosophical interpretation such as Ibn Rushd and al-Farabi, and the next group is a group that disagrees with ittijahfalsaf, namely al-Ghazali and ar-Razi. In this study, researchers mainly focus on the debate between the advantages and disadvantages of the interpretation of the philosophical ittijah dedicated to the interpretation of al-Ghazali and al-Farabi.


References


A. Heris Hermawan, Y. S. (2011). Filsafat Islam. Bandung: CV Insan Mandiri.

Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Makasar: Syakir Media Press.

Al-Farmawi, A. A.-H. (1996). Metode Tafsir Mawdhu’i Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Al-Manzhur, I. (1993). Lisan Al-Arab. Daar As-Shadir.

Al-Rumi, F. (1997). Ittijah at al-Tafsir Fi al-Qarni al-Rabi Asar. Bairut: Mua’assah al-Risalah.

Az-Zarqani, A. M. (n.d.). Manahil al-Irfan fi Ulum al-QUr'an. Mesir: Musthafa Bab al-Halabi.

Bagus, L. (2005). Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: PT. Garmedia Pustaka.

Bahasa, B. P. (2016). KBBI Daring: Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Baidan, N. (1988). Metodologi Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bashori, A. I. (2019). Pergeseran Tafsir Tahliliy Menuju Tafsir Ijmaliy. Kaca Jurusan Ushuluddin, 105-122.

Hasan, A. (1994). Sejarah dan Metodologi Tafsir. Jakarta: PTRajaGrafindo Persada.

Herlambang, S. (2020). Pengantar Ilmu Tafsir. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Samudra Biru.

Izzan, A. (2009). Metodologi Ilmu Tafsir. Bandung: Tafakur.

Kartanegara, M. (2007). Nalar Religius: Memahami Hakikat Tuhan, Alam dan Manusia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Muntawali, M. (n.d.). Tafsir Ijmali Sebagai Metode Tafsir Rasulullah.

Mustaqim, A. (2010). Epistemologi Tafsir Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: PT. LKiS Printing Cemerlang.

Mustofa, A. (1997). Filsafat Islam. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Mutawally, M. (n.d.). Tafsir Ijmali Sebagai Metode Tafsir Rasulullah. Mataram.

Nasution, H. (1978). Filsafat dan Mistisisme Dalam Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Nazlianto, R. (2020). Tafsir Ijmali dan Maudhui. Medan: Perdana Publishing.

Penyusun, T. (1988). Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Putra, A. (2018). Metodologi Tafsir. Jurnal Ulunnuha.

Saleh, A. S. (2007). Metodologi Tafsir Al-Qur`an Kontemporer Dalam Pandangan Fazlur Rahman. Jakarta: Sulthan Thaha Press.

Sanaky, H. A. (2008). Metode Tafsir (Perkembangan Metode Tafsir Mengikuti Warna AtauittijahMufassirin). Al-Mawarid, 268.

Sunarsa, S. (2019). Teori Tafsir. AL-Afkar, 248-260.

Syafieh. (2017). Perkembangan Tafsir Falsafi dalam Perkembangan Islam. at-Tibyan , 145-146.

Zunairoh, Y. (2015). Penafsiran Al-Qur'an dengan Filsafat'Telaah Kitab Mafatih al-Ghaib Fakhruddin Al-Razi'. Vol.24 No. 1, 122.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/djash.v2i1.29406

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.