Focus and Scope

Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah ini diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Manajemen Keuangan Syariah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.  Jurnal ini diterbitkan untuk menjadi wadah bagi para peneliti/akademisi dan juga praktisi yang tertarik dengan ilmu pengetahuan dan berdiskusi tentang ide, isu-isu terkini dan tantangan di bidang Ekonomi dan bisnis syariah, keuangan dan perbankan syariah, serta akuntansi syariah. Selain itu, jurnal ini dapat memberikan kontribusi untuk memecahkan masalah umat, batasan antara teori dan praktek dan lain sebagainya.

Ruang lingkup jurnal ini akan mencakup tetapi tidak terbatas pada: manajemen keuangan syariah, bisnis syariah, perbankan syariah, pasar modal syariah, manajemen kekayaan syariah, isu-isu penerapan / praktik syariah dari perbankan syariah, zakat dan wakaf, takaful, syariah keuangan perusahaan, manajemen risiko sesuai syariah, manajemen pembiayaan syariah, derivatif Islam, masalah Dewan Pengawas Syariah, etika bisnis Islam, akuntansi syariah, dan audit syariah.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Peer review process merupakan proses peninjauan sejawat yang dilakukan oleh editor dan mitra bestari, berikut alur peer review process:

1. Artikel yang dikirim oleh penulis harus mengacu pada fokus dan ruang lingkup jurnal serta pedoman penulisan Jurnal Finansha.
2.  Artikel yang sudah dikirim akan dibaca oleh tim editor, kemudian akan dievaluasi oleh editor apakah sesuai dengan kriteria jurnal finansha atau tidak.
3. Artikel yang tidak sesuai dengan kriteria jurnal ditolak segera tanpa tinjauan eksternal.
4. Artikel yang dievaluasi berpotensi menarik bagi pembaca akan kami kirim ke peninjau.
5. Setiap artikel ditinjau secara independen oleh setidaknya dua peninjau (reviewer). Dalam kasus tertentu, editor dapat mengirimkan artikel untuk ditinjau kepada orang lain, peninjau ketiga sebelum mengambil keputusan, jika perlu.
6. Editor kemudian membuat keputusan untuk publikasi berdasarkan rekomendasi peninjau dari beberapa kemungkinan: Terima, Terima dengan revisi, Kirim untuk ditinjau, Kirim di tempat lain, atau Tolak.
7. Semua manuskrip harus bebas dari konten plagiarisme. Semua penulis disarankan untuk menggunakan software pendeteksi plagiarisme untuk melakukan pengecekan kesamaan. Editor memeriksa deteksi plagiarisme artikel di jurnal ini dengan menggunakan perangkat lunak Turnitin.

Alur penerbitan artikel penulis:

1. Penulis mengirimkan naskah
2. Evaluasi Editor (beberapa artikel  ditolak atau dikembalikan sebelum proses review)
3. Proses peer-review
4. Keputusan editor
5. Konfirmasi kepada penulis

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Frequency

Finansha: Journal of Islamic Financial Management, dipublikasikan dua kali dalam setahun pada Juni dan Desember dalam bentuk daring dan cetak.

Article Publication Charge

Finansha tidak memungut biaya apapun bagi penulis dan pembaca.

Screening Plagiarism

Finansha tidak akan mentolerir segala bentuk plagiarisme. Penulis harus memahami betul etika publikasi tentang plagiarisme. Untuk memastikan bahwa makalah Anda bebas dari plagiarisme, setidaknya kami akan mengambil dua langkah berikut:

1. Penilaian cepat dengan perangkat lunak pemeriksaan plagiarisme Turnitin
2. Penilaian komprehensif oleh editor.

Reference Management

Dalam penulisan Sitasi dan Daftar Pustaka, Jurnal Ilmiah Finansha menggunakan perangkat lunak Manajemen Referensi Mendeley dan Zotero.

Publication Ethics

Finansha is a peer-reviewed journal, consistently published twice a year (starting in 2020) by the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, State Islamic University Sunan Gunung Djati. It is available online as an open access source as well as in print. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including authors, editor-in-chief, editorial board, reviewers, and publishers (Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, State Islamic University Sunan Gunung Djati)

This statement based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

Publishing articles on Finansha is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the author's work and the institutions that support it. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on standards of ethical behavior that are expected for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public.

As a publisher of Finansha, the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University takes its guardianship duties over all stages of publishing seriously and acknowledges ethical and other responsibilities. The Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business at Sunan Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenues have no influence or influence on editorial decisions.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Finansha: Finansha- Journal of Sharia Financial Management  is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest 

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not use in an editor's research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Peer-Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer-reviewers assist the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also help the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be considered as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Peer-review process should conduct objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Peer-reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument reported should accompany by the appropriate citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer-review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Peer-reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original actions and if the authors have used the works, or words of others that this has appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same paper concurrently to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be provided. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.