Pancasila in the Perception and Practice of Religious-Based University Students in Bandung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/hanifiya.v7i1.34528Keywords:
moral value, religious community, religious principles, state ideology, student life.Abstract
Pancasila is the ideological guideline of the Indonesian state. As a philosophical foundation, Pancasila is a guideline for civic behavior. Religious pluralism is a challenge that must be answered by Pancasila which is practiced in the lives of Indonesian society. As part of society who must participate in the development of state ideology, students are an important part in the practice of Pancasila. By taking samples from Theology students, this study compares how Pancasila is perceived both from a cognitive and practical perspective by Catholic students at Parahyangan Catholic University (UNPAR) and Islamic students at Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University (UIN). Both universities are in Bandung, which is a big city inhabited by followers of various religions. The study was carried out using a qualitative and descriptive approach to the students by observation, interviews and documentation studies from the two groups of theology students. The analysis is carried out using an interactive model, which consists of data interpretation, data classification, inference and data presentation activities. The advantage of this model is that it can be taken back from the field if something is still not perfect. The theoretical analysis is based on the theory of political participation and the theory of ideological perception and practice. The research results show that Indonesia's basic philosophical framework, developed differently among Islamic and Catholic students, shows the intersection between religious beliefs and national ideology. Islamic students often explore the complex relationship between Islamic principles and the secular nature of Pancasila. Although divinity is in line with Islamic monotheism, interpretations of the ideals of democracy and social justice within the Pancasila framework can vary. Some Islamic students participate actively in societal processes, contributing to democratic values, but there are differing discussions regarding the compatibility of certain Pancasila principles with Islamic teachings. On the other hand, Catholic students approach implementing Pancasila by emphasizing ethical and moral values that are in accordance with the teachings of their religion. Social justice, which is a core principle of Pancasila, is in line with Catholic doctrine, thereby encouraging Catholic students to get involved in initiatives that address social inequality. Both Islamic and Catholic students contribute to the implementation of Pancasila in their unique ways. However, they show that the principles of Pancasila can become a common foundation for religious communities in Indonesia. The variety of ways these students navigate its application reflects Pancasila's ability to accommodate diverse religious perspectives and contribute to Indonesia's collective identity. The political participation of students of different religions can have a significant impact on the development of the state ideology of Pancasila. Students feel it is important to understand and uphold the Pancasila ideology to become politically mature citizens and contribute to building a democratic political system. Efforts to curb the politicization of religion and encourage interfaith dialogue are very important to uphold the Pancasila ideology in Indonesia.References
Abdullah. (2010). Ideology and State. Policy Perspectives, 75–103.
Afifah, R., & Fadilah, N. R. (2023). Implementation of Pancasila Values in Students in Everyday Life. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 1(02), 51–57.
Akhavan, P., Ghojavand, S., & Abdali, R. (2012). Knowledge Sharing and its Impact on Knowledge Creation. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 11(02), 1250012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649212500128
Ali, A. ad S., & Bisri, A. M. (2009). Negara Pancasila: jalan kemaslahatan berbangsa. (No Title).
Ananta, A., Nurvidya Arifin, E., Sairi Hasbullah, M., Handayani, N. B., & Pramono, A. (2015). Demography of Indonesia’s Ethnicity. In Demography of Indonesia’s Ethnicity. Insitute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS). https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814519885
Baeva, L. V. (2016). Virtual Communication. International Journal of Technoethics, 7(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.2016010104
Brajovic, Z. (2007). The potential of inter-religious dialogue. Peace Building and Civil Society in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Ten Years after Dayton, 185–214.
Byron, P. (2020). Digital media, friendship and cultures of care. Routledge.
Croce, M. (2019). Exemplarism in moral education: Problems with applicability and indoctrination. Journal of Moral Education, 48(3), 291–302.
Garfinkel, R. (2008). What works?: Evaluating interfaith dialogue programs. Diane Publishing.
Handayani, P. A., & Dewi, D. A. (2021). Implementasi Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Negara. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 6–12.
Hasenclever, A., & Rittberger, V. (2000). Does religion make a difference? Theoretical approaches to the impact of faith on political conflict. Millenium, 29(3), 641–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290031401
Husaini, A. (2009). Pancasila bukan untuk menindas hak konstitusional umat Islam: kesalahpahaman dan penyalahpahaman terhadap Pancasila, 1945-2009. Gema Insani.
Koento, W. S. (1989). Pancasila sebagai Ideologi Terbuka, Makalah pada Lokakarya Dosen-dosen Pancasila di PTN dan PTS se Kopertis Wilayah V. Yogyakarta.
Latif, Y. (2013). Negara paripurna. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Madinier, R. (2022). Pancasila in Indonesia a" religious laicity" under attack? De Gruyter.
Madjid, N. (1992). Islam: Doktrin dan Peradaban. Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina Jakarta.
Mas’ud, A. (2021). Pancasila and Religious Harmony.
Mosher, L. A. (2014). The episcopal church religious manyness: Steps toward a theology. Anglican Theological Review, 96(1), 57–72.
Pan, B. (2022). The Origin and Evolution of Philosophy of Technology: Comments on The Thoughtful History of Philosophy of Technology: Review of The Thoughtful History of Philosophy of Technology, edited by Chen Fan and Zhu Chunyan. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 26(1), 197–206.
Pohan, F. (2002). Kembali Memahami Pancasila. Citapustaka Media Perintis.
Rahman, M. T., & Mimbar, A. S. (2018). Konsep politik Islam kultural perspektif Nurcholish Madjid. FIKRI: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 3(2), 385–400.
Rahman, M. T., & Mufti, M. (2021). Massification of youth religious studies to prevent juvenile delinquency in Bandung. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 77(4), 9.
Rakoff, R. M. (1977). Ideology in everyday life:-the meaning of the house. Politics & Society, 7(1), 85–104.
Setia, P., & Rahman, M. T. (2022). Socializing religious moderation and peace in the Indonesian lanscape. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 2(3), 333–340.
Silverman, D. (2015). Interpreting Qualitative Data. Sage Publications.
Soeryanto, Po. (1991). Pancasila sebagai ldeologi Ditinjau dari Segi Pandangan Hidup &rsama, dalam’Pancasila sebagai Ideologi. BP-7 Pusat, Jakarta.
Starman, A. B. (2013). The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 1(1), 28–43.
Sulasman, S., & Dewi, E. K. (2014). Relation Between Pancasila and Islamic Values on Religious Freedom. Al-Ulum, 14(2), 325–342.
Suryadinata, L. (1992). Golkar dan militer: Studi tentang budaya politik.
Tillapaugh, D. (2019). Student involvement and engagement. In Rethinking college student development theory using critical frameworks (pp. 191–205). Routledge.
Truna, D. S., Viktorahadi, R. F. B., & Haq, M. Z. (2022). Gender equality in Catholic religious and character education: A multiculturalism perspective. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(4).
Ubaidillah, A. (2015). Pancasila, demokrasi, & pencegahan korupsi. Kencana.
Ungureanu, J. C. (2019). Science, Religion, and the Protestant Tradition: Retracing the Origins of Conflict. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Zembylas, M. (2020). The affective modes of right-wing populism: Trump pedagogy and lessons for democratic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(2), 151–166.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).