NAHWU AL-FARRA’S THOUGHTS IN SURAH AL-MULK’S IN THE BOOK OF MA’ANI AL-QUR’AN LINGUISTIK MADZHAB STUDY

Authors

  • Halimatun Nashihah UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Moh. Habib UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
  • Lukman Nulhakim UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/hijai.v7i2.38166

Keywords:

Nahwu, Al-Farra’, Ma’ani al-Qur’an

Abstract

Al-Farra’ is a major figure in the Kufah school of thought who made many contributions to Arabic grammar or nahwu. Al-Farra’s most famous work is the book Ma’ani al-Qur’an which is divided into three Juz/parts. The uniqueness of the book Ma’ani al-Qur’an is that it is a book of interpretation which has a nahwu style, and in each surah not all verses are written. Therefore, it will be very interesting to explore and uncover the contents of the book Ma’ani al-Qur’an by al-Farra’. The method used in this study is descriptive-qualitative, with the material object used being the book Ma’ani al-Qur’an juz 3 in the surah al-Mulk. The results of the study show that of the 11 verses of surah al-Mulk, there are 8 verses that are the subject of debate among experts and the pure thoughts of al-Farra’. In his thinking, al-Farra’ always considers the diction of word forms so as not to change the essence of the meaning of the text contained in the verses of the Qur’an. In addition, he tends to use the principles of ta’wil (interpretation), qiyas (analogy), ijma’, and lughah (eloquent language) in his ushul (principles) of nahwu.

Author Biography

Halimatun Nashihah, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Mahasiswa Pascasarjana, Bahasa dan Sastra Arab, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

References

Abdulridha, K., Khafaji, A., & Najm, R. S. (2023). The Scholars Coming to Baghdad Included Judiciary , History , Biography , Poetry , and Literature. Migration Letters, 20(s11), 339–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS11.5649

Alhamadi, A. A. D. (2021). أثر علوم القران ÙÙŠ توجيه المعاني كتاب معانس القران للÙراء دراسة انتقائية تحليلية. مجلة العلوم الإسلامية الدولية, 5(4), 1–34. http://ojs.mediu.edu.my/index.php/IISJ/article/view/3581/1196

An-Nabiil, M. S., & Sarifudin, M. (2024). Al-Farra’ dan Madzhab Kufah. Ihtimam: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arabasa Arab, 7(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.57251/lhh.v3i1.909

Aryobimo, B., Abdurrahman, M., & Sopian, A. (2023). The Nahwu Kufah Mazhab’s View in Data Approach to Determining Rules. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 6(7), 72–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.7.9

Ashari, H., & Rahmat R. (2019). Istilah Al-Fi’il Al-Daim dan Penggunaannya di Dalam Aliran Nahwu Kufah. Al-Mutsla: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Dan Kemasyarakatan, 1(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46870/jstain.v1i1.19

Asriyah, & Limpo, M. (2021). DISTINGSI KITAB TAFSIR MA’ANY AL-QUR’AN KARYA AL-FARRA’ DAN PENGARUHNYA DI INDONESIA. Al-Hikmah, 23(2), 15–38. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.24252/al-hikmah.v23i2.23902

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian KKualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.

Fauziah, I. L., & Sopian, A. (2023). Kajian Inna : Dialektika Aliran Basrah dan Kufah dalam Buku Al-Inshâf fî Masâil Al-Khilâf. Ukazh: Journal of Arabic Studies, 4(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.37274/ukazh.v4i1.739

Holilulloh, A., & Luthfi, K. M. (2021). ‫ Pengaruh Madzhab Bashrah Terhadap Kitab an-Nahwu Al-Wadhih Karya Ali Al-Jarim Dan Mushtafa Amin. Imla Indonesia, 783–797. https://prosiding.imla.or.id/index.php/pinba/article/view/316/315‬‬

Holilulloh, A., Sugiyono, S., & Afandi, Z. (2021). Taisir al-Nahw al-‘Arabi: The Analysis of Mahdi al-Makhzumi’s Thoughts in the Reform of Nahwu/Taisir al-Nahw al-‘Arabi: Analisis Pemikiran Mahdi al-Makhzumi dalam Pembaruan Nahwu. Arabiyatuna : Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 5(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v5i1.2102

Mustaqim, A. (2019). TAFSIR LINGUISTIK ( Studi atas Tafsir Ma ’ anil Qur ’ an Karya al-Farra ’). Qof, 3(1), 1–11. https://jurnal.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/qof/article/view/722

prof. dr. Mahsun, M. . (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa (kedua). Rajawali Press.

Rohman, A., & Mubaroka, B. (2024). Keunikan Metodologi Tafsir Al-Farra: Ma’Ani Al-Qur’an. Al Muhafidz: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.57163/almuhafidz.v4i1.89

Rusydi, A. (2024). Ilmu Qira’at dan Dampaknya pada Kemunculan dan Perkembangan Ilmu Nahwu. Al-Muhith: Jurnal Ilmu Qur’an Dan Hadits, 2(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v2i1.3199

Sa’diyah, H., Abdurrahman, M., & Sopian, A. (2021). ENGARUH MADRASAH KUFAH DALAM KITAB NAHWU YANG DIAJARKAN DI INDONESIA. Hijai: Journal on Arabic Language and Literature, 04(1), 1–16.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Uthman, Y. O. O.-O. (2021). The Evolution of Qur’anic Interpretation In the First Three Centuries of Islam. IJISH (International Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities), 4(2), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.26555/ijish.v4i2.4462

Yahya, F., Abdurrahman, M., & Sopian, A. (2021). The Dissimilarities Between The Nahwu Science of The Basrah and Kufah Sects Along with Their Implications for Translating Al-Qur’an. Diwan : Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 7(2), 175–190. https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/diwan/article/view/21217

الÙرّاء, Ø£. ز. ÙŠ. ب. ز. (1955a). معانى القران - الجزء الأوّل. طبعة دارا الكتب المصرية. https://archive.org/details/1-1955/معاني القرآن للÙراء 1 1955/

الÙرّاء, Ø£. ز. ÙŠ. ب. ز. (1955b). معانى القران - الجزء الثانى. الدارا المصرية للتألب٠والترجمة. https://archive.org/details/1-1955/معاني القرآن للÙراء 2 1955/page/n5/mode/2up

الÙرّاء, Ø£. ز. ÙŠ. ب. ز. (1955c). معاني القرآن - الجزء الثالث. الهيئة المصرية العامة للكتاب. https://archive.org/details/1-1955/معاني القرآن للÙراء 3 1955/

رÙيدة, ا. ع. (1990). النحو وكتب التÙسير. دار الكتب الوطنية. https://archive.org/details/20200227_20200227_0742

ضيÙ, Ø´. (1968). المدرسة النحوية (pp. 1–372). دار المعارÙ.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-16

Issue

Section

Articles