Principles of Justice, Conference and Legal Accountability in Divorce Rules


Masri Olii(1*)

(1) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Religious Courts, in the last decade (since 2005) or since the implementation of the one roof system of judiciary, have made various improvements in the administration of justice to support efforts to reform the judiciary based on the principles of transparency and accessibility for all. the justice seeker. The Religious Courts are trying to reform several sub-systems in the judicial system that have so far not reflected equal access for justice seekers as well as protection or partiality for the rights and legal access of women, children, and the poor. The results of this study indicate that: the religious court is a place to seek justice and resolve Islamic family law problems, so in providing services to the community, it has the main task of providing fair and humane treatment to justice seekers, providing sympathetic services and assistance needed for justice seekers, and provide effective, efficient, thorough and final settlement of cases so as to satisfy the public.

Keywords


Religious Courts, Justice, Poor, women, children, legal, the rights.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, P. (2020). Hukum Islam: Sejarah, Perkembangan, dan Implementasinya di Indonesia (Buku 2). Sinar Grafika.

Al-Jauziyah, I. Q. (2006). Al-Turuq al-Hukmiyyah fi al-Siyasah al- Syar’iyyah—Hukum Acara peradilan Islam (A. Qihar, Trans.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Alkostar, A. (2019). Menegakan Hukum Pidana. Mahkamah Agung. https:// www.mahkamahagung.go.id/images/uploaded/15f.MENEGAKKAN_HUKUM_PIDANA.pdf.

Butarbutar, E. N. (2009). Konsep Keadilan Dalam Hukum Perdata. Mimbar Hukum, 12.

Hamdani, N. (1992). Teori Tujuan Hukum. Gramedia.

Hartini. (2009). Pengecualian terhadap Penerapan Asas Ultra Petitum Partium dalam Beracara di Pengadilan Agama. Mimbar Hukum, 21(2).

Jurdi, F. (2017). Logika Hukum. Prenadamedia Group.

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2014). Problematika hakim dalam konteks hukum, pengadilan dan kemasyarakatan di Indonesia: Studi sosio-legal. Sekretariat Jendral Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.

Levit, N., & Verchick, R. R. M. (2016). Feminist Legal Theory. NYU Press.

Muqoddas, B. (2002). Mengkritik Asas-Asas Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum, 9(20).

Rahardjo, S. (2016). Sisi-sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Kompas.

Rahmah, A. M. (2013). Hermeneutika Hukum Sebagai Alternatif Metode Penemua Hukum Bagi Hakim Untuk Menunjang Keadilan Gender. Jurnal DInamika Hukum, 13(2).

Soepomo, R. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata. Pradnya Pramita.

Sulardi. (2015). Kepastian Hukum, Kemanfaatan, Dan Keadilan Terhadap Perkara Anak Kajian Putusan Nomormor. 201/Pid.Sus/2014/PN Blt. Jurnal Yudisial, 8(3).

Wantu, F. M. (2007). Antinomi Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim. Mimbar Hukum, 19(3).

Wantu, F. M. (2012). Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatn Dalam Putusan Hakim Diperadilan Perdata. Jurnal DInamika Hukum, 12(3).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v8i2.12408

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Flag Counter

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

International Journal of Nusantara Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License